Gran Jurado del Condado de Trinity

2010-2011

9 informes

From the annual report
The consolidated year-end volume. The individual investigations it contains are listed separately below.
📑 Year-End Report
The full consolidated volume; individual reports are listed below.
Individual reports (9)

Hallazgos y recomendaciones aún no extraídos.

Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 10 hallazgos
F1: All three branches of emergency services (Law Enforcement, Medical Services, and Fire Protection) report financial shortfalls in being able to fund a desired level of service. Funding issues were consistently among the top challenges and needs reported. Other top needs, such as increased training and volunteer recruiting and retention are tied to funding. This finding is consistent with this Grand Jury's findings in report FAR 2010/2011-002 "Grants Department Imperils County Finances".
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1: Effective grant application writers and project administrators should be identified, shared, and utilized to seek such funding as may be available. Information, equipment, and skills should be shared through organizations such as the Trinity County Fire Chiefs Association.
F2: Methods identified for generating revenues include: establishing special districts where they don't currently exist in order to generate tax funding for their departments; increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax with funds dedicated to public safety/emergency services; and working more collaboratively with multiple departments, the Fire Chiefs Association, and the County to identify, pursue, and administer grant projects.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2: Formation of special districts and related tax or fee assessments should be considered.
F3: Cost saving methods identified in the investigation include: consolidation of departments and asking larger, more capable organizations to provide administrative support to their smaller counterparts. It is clear that merely cutting costs will not maintain stable emergency services—out of necessity, Trinity County's response organizations have become adept at saving funds where they can. Increased revenues are essential. This finding is consistent with this Grand Jury's findings in report FAR 2010/2011-002 "Grants Department Imperils County Finances".
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3: Organizations and County leadership should collaborate to conduct strategic planning, identify potential sources of stable revenue, and formulate strategies for maintaining adequate levels of emergency services. .
F4: Fire and EMS organizations both report difficulty in recruiting and retaining adequate numbers of qualified personnel. This is particularly true in organizations relying on volunteers but also relevant in paid forces due to apparently low pay scale and irregular and long shifts, typical of 24/7 emergency service requirements.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (5)
R4a: Continue ongoing recruiting effort at community service events.
R4b: Response organizations should make relevant community appearances in uniform so community will recognize those affiliated with various public safety organizations.
R4c: Make personnel needs known through newspapers, sign boards, and visits to schools, churches, and civic organization meetings.
R4d: Make facilities as "people friendly" as possible for participants and schedule regular training and social events.
R4e: Organizations and the County should explore collaborations to identify specific needs and solutions.
F5: Training requirements are continually changing to reflect improvements in technology, evolving regulations, and mission vision both from on high and within the individual organization. This is complicated by turnover in personnel who are often volunteers with wide-ranging skills and motivated primarily by a desire to render service to their communities.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (8)
R5a: Continue to support those providing training today, such as Trinity County Life Support, the Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services, the County Fire Chiefs Association, and larger fire-rescue organizations.
R5b: Continue to utilize outside trainers such as CalFIRE, and engage retired professionals in appropriate fields.
R5c: Set up training on a regular and frequent basis.
R5d: Cross-train with allied services such as Fire/EMS.
R5e: Identify, develop, and maximize the utilization of trainers within the County.
R5f: Establish training goals and recognize qualifications achieved.
R5g: Consider collaborative development of a training needs assessment and a longterm training strategy and plan.
R5h: Explore training that might be offered to other counties to generate revenues for hosting organizations.
F6: The overall state of emergency equipment in the County is not acceptable. While some departments have received new vehicles and equipment through grants in recent years, those are far outnumbered by outdated examples. This creates a risk to public safety, especially during large incidents such as major wildfires.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (4)
R6a: Emergency service providers should periodically perform an objective assessment of their equipment.
R6b: Fire departments and medical transporters should establish and fund reserve accounts for major equipment replacement.
R6c: Used equipment should continue to be pursued and passed down as long as there is practical and economical service life left in it.
R6d: Collaborative long term planning for equipment needs and procurement methods should be considered.
F7: Emergency Management grant funds are being supplanted in violation of grant terms. This jeopardizes future grant funding and makes the County vulnerable to demands for repayment, including past project years.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (3)
R7a: The County should immediately discontinue the practice of improperly supplanting grant funds.
R7b: The County should implement a policy addressing the practice for the future.
R7c: The county should develop and implement a plan to correct the grant balances previously supplanted.
F8: Parts of the County fall outside of formal response boundaries for structure fire, rescue, and medical emergency response. This can complicate dispatch, response, and command authority decisions.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R8: Fire Departments, through their respective governing boards, in cooperation with the Trinity County Fire Chiefs Association, should assess their response areas in relation to adjacent departments to collectively identify and map formal response areas throughout the County.
F9: Trinity County government's priority for public safety and emergency services has been unclear in recent years. While it is recognized that all communities, disciplines, organizations, and services must share the burden of a poor economy, a clearly articulated priority and strategy for these essential services could help all concerned in strategic planning.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R9: County government should clearly state its priority for public safety and emergency services, including funding, allocation of resources, and both material and non-material support.
F10: The Trinity County Fire Chiefs Association and many of the member fire/rescue and EMS organizations are to be applauded for their willingness to share surplus equipment and seek out avenues for obtaining additional equipment.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 2 hallazgos
F1: There is no legal mandate for a county jail and alternatives exist under California law.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1: b: Initiate discussions with contiguous counties on the operational and financial feasibility of a regional district jail. Recommendation lc: Issue a Request for Information to private management companies to run the Jail.
F2: If the Jail remains open there are cost saving measures to be immediately considered by the Sheriff.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (4)
R2: California Government Code states: "26610. The sheriff of any county which maintains a jail in another county has the same control and supervision of the property, personnel, and inmates that he would have if the jail were located within the boundaries of the county which maintains it." "23013. The board of supervisors of any county may, by resolution, establish a department of correction, to be headed by an officer appointed by the board, which shall have jurisdiction over all county functions, personnel, and facilities, or so may as the board names in its resolution relating to institutional punishment, care, treatment, and rehabilitation of prisoners, including, but not limited to, the county jail, and industrial farms and road camps, their functions and personnel. The boards of supervisors of two or more counties may, by agreement and the enactments of ordinances in conformity thereto, establish a joint department of corrections to serve all the counties included in the agreement, to be headed by an officer appointed by the boards jointly." California Penal Code states: "4007. When there is no jail in the county, or when the jail becomes unfit or unsafe for the confinement of prisoners, the judge of the superior court may, by a written order filed with the clerk of the court, designate the jail of a contiguous county for the confinement of any prisoner of his or her county, and may at any time modify or vacate the order." "4051. Any two or more counties may form a district for the purpose of establishing and operating a joint county jail to serve such counties." "4053. The board of supervisors of any county may initiate proceedings proposing the creation of a joint district for the purpose of maintaining a joint county jail under the provisions of this chapter to be composed of two or more counties by the adoption of a resolution reciting the following: (1) That it will be beneficial to the public interest to create a joint district for the establishment or operation, or both, of a joint county jail to which persons from any of the counties proposed to be included in the proposed district may be committed. (2) The names of the counties proposed to be included in the proposed district which will be benefited by the formation thereof. (3) That it is proposed to create a joint district for the establishment or operation, or both, of a joint county jail under the provisions of this chapter for the counties so named." Method of Investigation The Judicial Committee analyzed the relevant Sections of CGC and CPC. Research on how other counties in California deal with county jails was conducted. The current Trinity County Grand Jury Report JUR2010/2011-002 on the County Jail was used as further reference. This report documents the state of jail deterioration and noncompliance that has existed for years. In some cases these issues go back to 1984, without being remedied. Discussion The existing County Jail houses the jail cells/dormitories, a kitchen, and a communication center for dispatch, emergency response and 911 calls. It is clear from reviewing the Grand Jury Report noted above that there are many deficiencies and very little has changed over the years. It was not determined as part of this report to what extent the Sheriff has looked at modifying operations in the Jail. Options to consider if the Jail is to remain open would include: outsourcing the preparation of meals, coordination with other counties for the development of a regional communications center, and/or development of a jail enterprise program to offset the operating costs of the jail. It is clear from both the CGC and CPC that there is an obligation on the part of the Sheriff and the Superior Court of the County to provide a means of incarceration upon arrest and arraignment, pending trial, and if convicted, for the period of incarceration determined by the court. Pending trial, this could be a holding cell and not a jail. If convicted, incarceration may be in a county jail or in a state prison depending on the length of stay and the type of felony conviction. There is currently an effort by the state government to return many prisoners from state prison to the county jail where convicted. The overall impact of this is not known, however, it is fair to assume that for Trinity County this would result in increased jail population, operating costs, more jail guards, and accelerated deterioration of a jail already in poor condition. While the added prisoners' cost will be offset in part by state funds provided to the counties, it is not clear that the jail can even accommodate the number of prisoners that could be returned or if the state funding will cover the added costs. Based on the review of the codes as noted in the Background section and on precedent set by other counties, the County has the following options: 1. A jail in county: The County can continue with the status quo and hope that things get better while continuing to cut budgets. 2. A jail out of county: The County could build a new jail outside the County but to what avail? If the County had the money, why not build it in our own county? 3. A privately run jail in county: the County could contract jail management to a private company. A successful example is the Corrections Corporation of America which provides statistics on savings to be attained. This is an approach used by Lake County, California. 4. No jail in county: a. Inmates could be sent to other county jails: CPC 4007 clearly provides that a county can exist without a jail and how the court must act. Alpine County has no jail and contracts jail services with El Dorado County and Calaveras County. On May 11, 2011, the Merced Sheriff proposed 4 closing the County's main jail but did not specify all actions that would be required to deal with the prisoner population beyond early release. A search of county jails in the state indicates that Merced, a county of 256,450 people, has only one county jail. b. Form a district comprised of two or more counties using a common jail with shared cost and operations. A consideration could be a regional jail in Trinity County which would add jobs to the economy. CGC 23013 as well as CPC 4051 and 4053 allow for the formation of a district made up of two or more counties. There are 65 counties in California. The research of these counties did not indicate that any counties have taken this path as yet. There is discussion, however, throughout California, that regional jails are a viable option in the efforts to contain jail budgets while maintaining a proper level of police protection. Findings/Recommendations Finding 1: There is no legal mandate for a county jail and alternatives exist under California law. Recommendation la: Conduct a County feasibility study to determine if contracting jail services in lieu of operating a jail is financially viable. Recommendation 1 b: Initiate discussions with contiguous counties on the operational and financial feasibility of a regional district jail. Recommendation lc: Issue a Request for Information to private management companies to run the Jail. Finding 2: If the Jail remains open there are cost saving measures to be immediately considered by the Sheriff. Recommendation 2a: Explore contracting out meals for the Jail and Juvenile Detention Facility to a private third party- 5 Recommendation 2b: Enter into discussion with adjoining counties on the feasibility of a regional communication center to handle 911 and emergency response calls. Recommendation 2c: Explore work programs within the Jail that provide a product or service of value that can partially offset operating costs of the Jail.
R2a: Explore contracting out meals for the Jail and Juvenile Detention Facility to a private third party- 5
R2b: Enter into discussion with adjoining counties on the feasibility of a regional communication center to handle 911 and emergency response calls.
R2c: Explore work programs within the Jail that provide a product or service of value that can partially offset operating costs of the Jail.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 8 hallazgos
F1: After reviewing previous years' final reports of the Grand Jury, the same issues addressed in this report have risen repeatedly without satisfactory resolution. The Jail Facility needs to be replaced. It is over 30 years old, out of CSA and ADA compliance, and much of its interior is obsolete. Overcrowding is common and the space is inadequate to meet current needs.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (3)
R1: b: Perform interim repairs as practical, with highest priority on those that affect inmate and staff safety and security. Look at funding from Homeland Security, FEMA, and/or other revenue sources including CA Assembly Bill ABIll. for a new Jail Facility and/or ideally a green Justice Center that would include providing reserve beds for temporary Federal Government prisoners (a potential revenue source). Although it may seem extreme, we have an extreme problem. Investigate non-traditional funding sources, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Yahoo!, or the ABC "Extreme Makeover Home Edition" program for assistance with creating a new Jail Facility. For other alternatives see JUR2010/2011-001, "Trinity County Jail - A Mandate or a Dead Weight?".
R1a: The facility must be brought into CSA compliance and/or be replaced to be eligible for State protection from potential lawsuits.
R1b: Perform interim repairs as practical, with highest priority on those that affect inmate and staff safety and security. Look at funding from Homeland Security, FEMA, and/or other revenue sources including CA Assembly Bill AB111, for a new Jail Facility and/or ideally a green Justice Center that would include providing reserve beds for temporary Federal Government prisoners (a potential revenue source). Although it may seem extreme, we have an extreme problem. Investigate non-traditional funding sources, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Yahoo!, or the ABC "Extreme Makeover Home Edition" program for assistance with creating a new Jail Facility. For other alternatives see JUR2010/2011-001, "Trinity County Jail - A Mandate or a Dead Weight?".
F2: The following are immediate needs that must be addressed with the current Jail Facility: generator system repairs aging and inadequate security video system number of staff, especially females complete repairs to Jail locks lack of ventilation for the computer equipment rooms
Recomendaciones relacionadas (2)
R2a: Aggressively pursue repair and/or replacement of aging items and install proper ventilation systems to keep the Jail functioning. Explore utilizing state surplus for compatible parts to replace the camera system in the Jail.
R2b: Advertise Jail positions to a broader spectrum of the population and fill needed positions on the Jail staff to meet state compliance.
F3: The following are issues with Environmental Health compliance: mold in the women's dormitory area flooring in the kitchen area the refrigerator/freezer in the Jail kitchen
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3: Follow through and complete needed repairs and purchases to bring the Jail into compliance with Environmental Health.
F4: The following items are out of CSA and/or ADA compliance: Communications Center • sobering cell • location of the Livescan Fingerprinting System
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4: Due to building constraints, the only way to come into compliance is to build a new Jail/Justice Center. Until such time as a new facility is available, convert the dining/multi-purpose room into a stand-alone Communications Center and use the opened space for the Livescan System and booking area. Pursue grants for transfer and implementation of the communication services. Lower the wall of the sobering cell to accommodate needed checks.
F5: The 911 and Reverse 911 Mapping Systems are inadequate. There have been dropped emergency calls and mapping coordinates for the Reverse 911 Mapping System are unreliable. The County was mapped in preparation for the Reverse 911 System; however, the detailed information was not utilized by the vendor.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5: Request County Counsel to revisit the contracts with the Mapping System vendors and explore options to have these issues corrected as expediently as possible. Work with Information Technology (IT) to be prepared when minor issues present themselves and pursue revenue sources for when shortfalls are encountered. Explore software for Global Positioning System (GPS) to assist in locating emergency calls made from cell phones.
F6: Emergency services calls are not always dispatched to the correct geographic area of Trinity County.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6: Upon hiring, train new Dispatchers in the geographic service areas (including mile markers) of Trinity County to ensure correct dispatch of emergency services. Develop and maintain effective reference materials in the Communications Center to support accurate location identification.
F7: The concertina wire surrounding the inmate exercise yard leaves a potential for escape. The wire is ineffective and unsafe for inmates and staff, and poses a threat to public safety.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R7: Identify and contract with a qualified installer to replace the concertina wire.
F8: The designated area for dispensing medications is unsafe due to inadequate space and security measures.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R8: When medical staff is on-site, administration of medications by correction officers should be moved to an actual medical room on the premises. Installation of a camera in the medication room for monitoring purposes would improve safety of staff and inmates.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 9 hallazgos
F1: Trinity County Grants Department lacked cohesive structure.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1: The creation of a structured department is imperative to the economic health of the communities and to supplement funds for the County Budget. The department must expand its breadth to include researching, locating, writing proposals, and obtaining grants applicable to Trinity County and its needs. The distribution of information to other departments or the business community when appropriate, the proper tracking of expenses, and the aging of cash carry-overs, are important features that need to be part of the Department's new structure.
F2: CDBG grants, which include the Housing Rehabilitation and Microenterprise Programs, are labor and time intensive.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2: Increase staffing levels to accommodate these necessary requirements or consider contracting portions of CDBG grants to local agencies.
F3: The grant revenues brought into Trinity County's economy in the past 15 years total $ 22.6 million, contributing to the overall economic health of the communities and County government.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3: Restructure the Department. Consider expansion of the department to include economic development activities. This expansion, with the appropriate staffing, would better utilize personnel, the potential funding sources, and would be more beneficial to the community overall. Creation of a strong department is critical to the economic health of the County.
F4: Administrative fees from grants do not cover all of the cost of running a grants department.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4: Amend grant agreements to increase program contributions where applicable, increase the amount of grant activity, and budget general funds to cover the expenses of grant activities not covered by, or recoverable from, administrative fees.
F5: Time and effort have been spent pursuing grants for which the County could not qualify, because it could not meet the requirements designed for larger counties.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5: Before expending substantial time on a grant opportunity, research should be conducted to ensure that the County or entities applying for the grant can meet the criteria, such as population density, demographics, matching funding, income levels, and other requirements necessary to receive the grant. A checklist or assessment tool should be obtained or devised for this purpose.
F6: Deficits have occurred when, for any number of reasons, an employee's time is spent pursuing a grant that is ultimately not awarded.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6: County General Funds should be budgeted to cover unrecoverable expenses.
F7: Grants Department policies and procedures are nonexistent, including no definition of "conflict of interest", an issue referenced in the CAO's Staff Report.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R7: A Policies and Procedures Manual should be immediately developed and implemented. It should include a strongly worded definition of "conflict of interest". We suggest the use of wording currently used in County contracts. A good example can be found in the County contract with Superior California Economic Development District for the Microenterprise portion of the CDBG grants. Additionally, the manual should define employee roles, checks and balances related to the accounting of funds, and the relationship with the CAO's office. Implement a formalized system of oversight and enforcement of policies and procedures. It should be noted that the department's Policies and Procedures Manual is not intended to replace the County Employee's Handbook, but to be specific to the operational structure of the Department.
F8: Lack of grants management software contributed to an unidentifiable deficit.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R8: Investigate the availability of grants management software, and acquire to support grant activities. This may be the answer to quickly reopening the department while other needed changes are being pursued.
F9: Lack of a qualified grants researcher/writer position has led to missed grant opportunities.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R9: Create a position for a grants researcher/writer. Hire or contract to fill this position with an individual who has a proven record of procurement of grants.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 3 hallazgos
F1: There is no comprehensive or independent analysis explaining the causes and effects of the reported $690,952 CGD deficit.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1: The County should immediately retain forensic accounting resources to determine the amount of the CGD deficit and its causes. This examination should include recommendations for controls and regular reporting, including details of individual grant status, to the Board of Supervisors.
F2: Because of the lack of any verification of the magnitude of the CGD deficit, the potential impacts on County budgeting and strategic planning are unknown.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2: Depending on the financial significance of the actual deficit, the Board of Supervisors should immediately determine the impact on future County operations, future grant activities, and related strategic implications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F3: With the closing of the County Grants Department and the delegation of its duties to existing County administrative personnel and no current policies, procedures or controls to preclude further deficits, the exposure to additional County liability could continue.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3: From the information obtained by analysis of causes of the deficits the Board of Supervisors should determine policies, procedures and controls to insure that there is no recurrence of deficit operations in County grant programs.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones 2 hallazgos
F2: There are currently 5.5 Probation Officers, including the Chief Probation Officer. There have been up to twelve officers in the past. It is a strong possibility that in the near future an additional 1.5 positions will be laid off, due to budget issues decreasing the total staff to only 4.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2: The County must increase the number of probation staff to meet state mandatory requirements based on facility size.
F3: The Facility needs an additional the control panel in the day room. The current panel may be left unattended when it is necessary for staff to leave the control room. An additional panel would enhance the safety and security of the staff and juvenile inmates especially with decreased staffing at night. The surveillance monitors are aging rapidly and do not provide for a sufficient view of all the day floor area.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3: Check with Federal/State surplus sources, in addition to grants and other funding to assist with the purchase of an additional control panel and video monitoring equipment.

Hallazgos y recomendaciones aún no extraídos.

Hallazgos y recomendaciones aún no extraídos.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.