⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
3 findings
There is no comprehensive or independent analysis explaining the causes and effects of the reported $690,952 CGD deficit.
Related Recommendations (1)
The County should immediately retain forensic accounting resources to determine the amount of the CGD deficit and its causes. This examination should include recommendations for controls and regular reporting, including details of individual grant status, to the Board of Supervisors.
Because of the lack of any verification of the magnitude of the CGD deficit, the potential impacts on County budgeting and strategic planning are unknown.
Related Recommendations (1)
Depending on the financial significance of the actual deficit, the Board of Supervisors should immediately determine the impact on future County operations, future grant activities, and related strategic implications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With the closing of the County Grants Department and the delegation of its duties to existing County administrative personnel and no current policies, procedures or controls to preclude further deficits, the exposure to additional County liability could continue.
Related Recommendations (1)
From the information obtained by analysis of causes of the deficits the Board of Supervisors should determine policies, procedures and controls to insure that there is no recurrence of deficit operations in County grant programs.
No Responses Found
2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
