Nevada County 1998-1999 - California Grand Jury Reports

📋Juvenile Hall------11

59 pages

Quick View Full Details →

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

📋Nevada County Sheriff's Office-----13

59 pages

Quick View Full Details →

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

📋Nevada Irrigation District Financial Report-----34

59 pages

Quick View Full Details →

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

📋Alternative Education*

41 pages 15 findings 5 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 15 findings

F1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year).

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year).

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.)

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12.

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and

Related Recommendations (1)

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 with community agencies. nightly. manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state Students required to wear • Independent Study Program funds that exceed the ADA • uniforms. on site for 200 additional monies. . School day is 6 hours (as of students; 74 graduated in Jan. 1999) with breakfast and 1998. Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time 1998. Route Hwy 49 for wards in Directed studies with Life . all grades that are Skills. incarcerated. 19 students at the Center but 3 hours per day with Work • ٠ Experience or Regional 10 were in the classroom Occupational Program. during the visit (Jan. 1999). 1 full-time teacher and 1 ٠ Sierra Central instructional aide with a group supervisor present. Located at the Sierra Directed Studies-same as • • Mountain high school Earle Jamison, for 3 hours of campus for grades 11-12. classroom time and 1 hour of 50 students, 2 full-time physical education with • teachers and 17 graduates group counselors. last June 1998. Wards are assigned to Earle ٠ Jamison when released from 3 hours per day or 5 hours a • Juvenile Hall. week if student is employed over 20 hours. Empire Located in California Youth • Authority facility on California Division of Forestry land on Washington Ridge about 10 miles east of Nevada City. 56 wards, 2 full-time and 8 ٠ part-time teachers. Graduated 5 in June 1998. All classes necessary for a ٠ high school diploma: 15 hours per week, 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Monday through Friday, 4 hours of core classes, 10 hours of electives and I hour of career education class. A high school diploma, General Educational Development or a special Ĺź equivalency diploma will allow an "honorable discharge" (wards' records are sealed). 14. On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS 1. The residents of Nevada County enjoy a number of educational options through the high school district. There are advantages in having several options to choose from, such as small class size, and different curriculum and social settings. 2. Lack of formal tracking practices leaves no reliable method for determining the success or failure of alternative education programs. 3. The 40percent absenteeism rate at Earle Jamison is a serious problem that must be addressed. 4. The school day at Earle Jamison and Juvenile Hall is shorter than at a traditional high school. Students w need the most help receive the least amount of instructional time. 5. Use of the state funded Regional Occupational Program (ROP) is a valuable tool for vocational training in county schools. 6. Good use has been made of space available at each site. 7. Administration and staff at all sites are dedicated professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. 2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison. 3. The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased. 4. The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. REQUIRED RESPONSES Nevada Joint Union High School District Board Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada County Board of Education Due Date: September 30,1999 Nevada Joint Union High School District Superintendent Due Date: August 30, 1999 Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Due Date: August 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 Nevada County SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer Date: July 22, 1999 To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. : Dr. Robert M. Stone, President From: Nevada County Governing Board of Education Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations The Nevada County Governing Board of Education has examined the Grand Jury's report and recommendations regarding the issues of Alternative Education in Nevada County. The Board has reviewed with Superintendent McAteer his reply and follow through actions. The Board is confident that both Superintendent McAteer and Superintendent Boeckx will take the necessary steps to correct the problems and we will return from time to time to check on what results have been achieved. Cordially, In Ste Dr. Robert M. Stone, President Cc: County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education 112 Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • 1.xx 530-478-6410 NEVADA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Terence K. McAteer July 22, 1999 Date: To: The Honorable Carl Bryan II Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Superior Court County of Nevada 95959 Nevada City, CA. From: Superintendent McAteer Re.: 1998-99 Civil Grand Jury Final Report Recommendations I have reviewed the Grand Jury's recent report regarding Alternative Education in Nevada County. I have discussed the report with my staff and the Nevada County Governing Board of Education. I wish to commend this Grand Jury for a thorough and concise documentation as to the state of alternative education for 6th-12th grades. The NJUHSD operates most of the alternative education programs either by contract with my office or as a high school function. I firmly believe that Mr. Boeckx and Mr. Conway are doing a tremendous job in revamping the alternative educational programs to meet the desired results the Grand Jury is seeking. The findings presented by the report are accurate. The recommendations are good, and I shall address each one individually. Grand Jury Recommendation #1. The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Not only is this recommendation essential but since many of these youth are involved with the Juvenile Justice System, we need greater tracking and information from the County of Nevada's Probation Department. I am currently working with Probation and Social Services to provide on-line student information to them to reduce truancy and provide up-to-date attendance and academic performance for probation officers and the juvenile court judge. Grand Jury Recommendation #2. The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson Done. Starting this school year a full time probation officer will be assigned to assist the 3R School and Earle Jamieson High School. Nevada City Highway • Nevada City, CA 95959 • Phone 530-478-6400 • Fax 530-478-6410 Grand Jury Recommendation #3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased I know that Mr. Boeckx and I agree that more class time is a necessity. The present facility and staffing at the Hall present many problems to increase instructional time. I'm sure that with a new hall and two classrooms, more time will be added. We have found a dramatic difference in academic achievement and behavior of our 3R youth by adding two hours of daily instructional time. Grand Jury Recommendation #4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. I will assist NJUHSD in any way possible to achieve this recommendation. I believe Regional Occupation Program (R.O.P.) classes should be offered on-site and will promote such a venue to Randi Scott, ROP Director. Cordially, Terence K. McAteer County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury Cc: Mr. Boeckx, Superintendent of NJUHSD Randi Scott, Director of R.O.P. Nevada County Governing Board of Education NEVADA JOINT UNIONHIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT September 27, 1999 Grand Jury of Nevada County County of Nevada 950 Maidu Ave. Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 98-99 Grand Jury Findings Dear Sir or Madam: The following are the Nevada Joint Union High School District responses to your findings listed in the 1998-99 Grand Jury report. Finding #1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed." Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #2: Alternative educational provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of the NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Finding #4: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 W comm. 9900-0003 An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students district-wide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48340 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4490.74 per 1 student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County, Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding (1998-99 school year). Finding #6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6499.15 per student. Response: The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent believes that the goal of community school should be to return only those students who do not present a threat to the safety and welfare of other students to their home schools. The respondent agrees with the rest of finding #6. Finding #7: Juvenile Court Schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by cartified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #7. Finding #8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for student in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitates Renew, Reinstate). Response: domm. 9900-0003 The respondent agrees with finding #8. The respondent does not operate the 3 R School.) Finding #9: Each school visited has administration, teachers, and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the number for the day visited by the Grand Jury. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #9. Finding #10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #10. Finding #11: The is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system. Response: The respondent disagrees with finding #11. The respondent meets all state codes and guidelines and keeps complete academic records on all students in the district. Finding #12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the school studies in this report. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #12. Finding #13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. Response: The respondent agrees with finding #13. Sincerely, Joseph K.-Boeckx Superintendent Nevada Joint UnionHigh School District Rec 7/21/99 JOSEPH K. BOECKX, SUPERINTENDENT July 21, 1999 Honorable Carl Bryan III Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse Nevada City, CA. 95959 RE: 1998-99 Grand Jury Recommendations Dear Judge Bryan: In accordance with sections 933(b) and 914.1 of the California Penal Code the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent are commenting to you, the presiding judge of the superior court, on the findings and recommendations of the grand jury pertaining to matters under our control. Attached you will find our responses to the four recommendations pertaining to the Nevada Joint Union High School District, made by the Nevada County Grand Jury. We found our dealings with the grand jury members to be pleasant and instructive. We are in general agreement with all of their recommendations. If you have questions about any of our responses to the grand jury's recommendations I will be happy to provide additional clarification. į RESPONSE TO FINDINGS No Sincerely, oseph K. Boeckx BUCKS Superintendent & Secretary to the Board of Trustees Office of the County Clerk pc: 11645 Ridge Road Grass Valley, California 95945 (530) 273-3351 Fax (530) 273-3372 Nevada County Grand Jury Recommendations Nevada Joint Union High School District RECOMMENDATIONS/RESPONSES í Grand Jury Recommendation #1 The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The District agrees with the grand jury's recommendation to track the effectiveness of alternative school programs. However, we will not use a single computer tracking system to carry out the task. In July and August of 1999 the Nevada Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees set targets to develop baseline data systems to track measured student performance to determine the effectiveness of all of its school programs, including alternative school programs. We think we are heading in the direction the grand jury is recommending. The district is in the process of implementing a data tracking system that will longitudinally track measured student performance at all schools. In most cases school-wide data can be tracked. In all cases individual student data can be tracked. In the cases of Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall, the short stay of the students makes some of the tracking data less than reliable. For example, the state will not report SAT 9 school-wide data on Earle Jamieson High School and Juvenile Hall because of the small populations. The average length of stay of a student at Earle Jamieson High is approximately four months and the average stay at Juvenile Hall is approximately 10-11 days. Beginning this summer, the district will be implementing an extensive data collection tracking system. Longitudinal tracks will be developed and used to determine the effectiveness of the instructional program. I have included the data tracks that have been completed to date. While we agree with the members of the grand jury that a tracking system needs to be in place to insure that all student are being taught well and moved through the system toward successful completion of the requirements of graduation, we may be using slightly different methodology to accomplish the task. Our end goal is to strengthen all of our programs, including our alternative education programs. We are committed to successfully teaching all of our students. We believe we can teach all students whose education is of interest to us. We are interested in and committed to the education of all of our students. The tracking systems should be complete and in place by the end of the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #2 The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamieson. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response We agree with the Grand Jury's recommendation. As of this date we have an į arrangement with the county probation department for the 1999-2000 school year. Grand Jury Recommendation #3 The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile hall be increased. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response The district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. The district is capable of and willing to increase the hours of instruction at Juvenile Hall. It is our understanding that for reasons of security and space the current facility will not accommodate an increase in hours. We have been told by the warden that the new juvenile hall may bring about conditions necessary to permit an expansion of hours. We can increase the hours on short notice. Increased hours will probably happen when the new juvenile hall is built. Grand Jury Recommendation #4 The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamieson include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work. Nevada Joint Union High School District Response ŧ Again the district agrees with the Grand Jury's recommendation. Designing a vocational education program that works in a school like Earle Jamieson is tricky. The students only stay an average of four months. We think we have found a program that will work. Two of Earle Jamieson's teachers have been trained by Sierra College's Twelve Bridges Program in computer repair and construction. Some of the existing computers at Earle Jamieson will be dedicated to the program. Earle Jamieson will receive a state Digital High School Technology Grant this year. Some of that money will be used for program start-up. The two teachers will be sent to a computer using educators conference to acquire additional training and equipment. We are planning to implement the program during the 1999-2000 school year. ŧ Ĭ ı á ŧ ŧ 1 ŧ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 į ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 9 70 65 63 60 60 59 59 60 57 56 55 54 50 Percentile Score 40 30 NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 10 99 ■ 98 7Q 64 59 60 57 56 55 55 54 53 52 50 Percentile Score 10 0 - LanguageTest Reading Mathematics Science Social Science ***** į ì i 1 t ì į. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 1 1 ŧ . . i ŧ ٠ - 1 ŧ NJUHSD SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 80 70 ٠ 68 64 70 60 59 58 -57 57 60 56 Percentile Score 53 50 40 30 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 9 98 99 80 71 71 68 70 66 64 60 60 59 60 Percentile Score 56 55 50 40 30 20 10 0 - Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Science Test $ ŧ į ١ Ĭ ŧ 1 ı ŧ 5 3 the first that the second of the second ı Bear River SAT 9 Grade 10 98 99 80 70 ' 69 70 67 65 64 62 62 58 Percentile Score 55 Bear River SAT 9 Grade 11 99 ■ 98 90 78 80 71 69 Bercentile Score 50 50 30 30 20 66 -66 66 64 63 61 54 10 0 - Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test ··· Ĭ 1 ş ţ 1 1 į. ŧ ı Í ŧ ſ ١ 1 4 į 1 • į 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 í Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 9 99 98 80 . 68 70 65 63 62 61 61 61 60 57 57 Percentile Score 56 50 40 30 Nevada Union SAT 9 Grade 10 ■ 98 99 80 69 70 61 60 60 59 58 60 57 56 54 Percentile Score 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mathematics Language Reading Science Social Science Test --- 1 1 ì ž 1 Æ . 1 ł 1 ı ŀ i t ŧ 1 ŧ

F14: On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track, Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It als approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School usi Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS

F1998: Pioneer lunch provided. No transportation provided. • Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett . teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for • Directed Studies: Students all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day. credits in subjects they need. morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union ٠ • 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11-

Page 3

Additional Recommendations 4

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The Grand Jury recommends a computer tracking system be developed to monitor students as they move through the school system to determine the effectiveness of alternative education programs.

R2: The Grand Jury recommends a contract with the county probation department be implemented to enforce attendance at Earle Jamison.

R3: The Grand Jury recommends class instruction time at Juvenile Hall be increased.

R4: The Grand Jury recommends Earle Jamison include vocational education training classes and life skills classes by the start of the September 1999 school year in order to develop skills that will assist the students in the world of work.

📋Planning Department Reason for the Investigation The Nevada County Civil Grand Jury received two formal complaints

7 pages 13 findings 6 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 13 findings

F1: The Planning Department is one of three departments which report to the Community Development Agency (CDA) director. Prior to the formation of the CDA in late 1997, the department director reported to the County Administrative Officer (CAO).

Page 1

F2: The Planning Department has been without a permanent director since 1992. The department was managed by the Director of Transportation until 1997 as an additional duty. He had an employee acting as assistant director handling day-to-day management. Since 1997, the assistant director has held the titles of acting director and, later, interim director. The county advertised for a permanent director in November 1998, and in March 1999 hired a replacement.

Page 1

F3: The Grand Jury has learned from interviewing staff that uncertainty and vagueness of direction since 1992 has put their department in disarray and has had a negative effect on employee morale. Employees reported to the Grand Jury that the Board of Supervisors (BOS) put very little value on the Planning Department's contribution to the County.

Page 1

F4: Time keeping and work hour practices received limited to no oversight by department management. The Grand Jury learned from employee interviews that some employees are repeatedly absent from ž work, often for hours at a time, then turn in questionable time cards. It was reported to the Grand Jury that department management signed the time cards of at least two employees which had been identified as false.

Page 1

F5: The use of telephones for personal matters is not controlled. An analysis of telephone logs revealed __ an unusual number of calls from one number to a local area number. The Grand Jury researched that number and found it to be a local motorcycle shop. In addition, the Grand Jury found a significant

Page 1

F6: It was alleged that a senior manager has a long history of taking extended lunch hours and of poor managerial habits. This has been well known to staff and to immediate and next level supervisors.

Page 1

F7: The department has a history of sexual innuendo and abusive behavior directed toward female employees. This reached such a stage that one individual's actions were reported to the CAO since it was alleged that Planning management would take no action. The female who reported this individual was later told by Planning management that her actions amounted to insubordination by reporting this to the CAO.

Page 1

F8: The female staff stated that they feel threatened by some of the department customers but have no effective method to summon police help, although assistance has been requested of Planning management.

Page 2

F9: Voluntary Time Off (VTO) was a plan developed during the county downsizing period to allow employees to work less than a 40 hour week, at a salary commensurate with the number of hours worked. The program allowed management, in spreading the work load, to retain more employees. The VTO plan is still in effect even though the downsizing period has long passed. However, employees testified that the rules for the VTO program are not enforced in an even-handed manner by management.

Page 2

F10: The function of code enforcement is to uphold regulations contained in the General Plan and ordinances passed by the BOS regarding Planning. Planning management hired a senior code enforcement officer in October 1998 who had a history of short tenures in many different organizations, with a pattern of consecutively reduced salaries, all documented on his application. The Interim Planning director stated that he checked the references of the candidate and found them to be satisfactory. The senior code enforcement officer was terminated for inappropriate conduct by the CDA director only 24 days after beginning work for the county.

Page 2

F11: Supervision for code enforcement has since been moved from the Planning Department to the Building Department. As of June 1, 1999, no recruitment for a Senior Code Enforcement Officer has - been initiated.

Page 2

F12: The department has certain State of California mandated responsibilities to inspect mining activities within the county, charge for this inspection service and report its findings back to the State of California. There is evidence that inspections may not have been made for the time charged to the ز ۾ mining company. In 1998 a mining company protested the county charge for inspections and reports. The charge was for more than $3,000 for a nine month period. The Grand Jury could not find adequate department-recorded information to support the charge in question.

Page 2

F13: Employees stated that the CAO has tolerated these problems in the Planning Department while knowing of their concerns. Interviewed employees stated that this lack of concern has reduced morale to what they call "an all time low". ċ.

Page 2

Additional Recommendations 6

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The BOS should develop a policy that mandates random audits of county employees' time keeping and telephone use practices. These audit results should be reviewed regularly by department management.

Page 1

R2: The Grand Jury recommends that the BOS amend all county hiring policies to include a more complete procedure for reviewing applicant work-related references, primarily in the hiring of key personnel.

Page 1

R3: The Grand Jury recommends that the CAO direct the Planning Department to institute a procedure of keeping detailed records for time and type of work performed in connection with mining activities which would be reviewed regularly and approved by the Planning Director.

Page 1

R4: The Grand Jury recommends that the CAO develop and make available a confidential process designed for employees' use to report work problems which they consider to be of a serious nature. Employees should be asked to sign reports but be assured of anonymity if desired and that the matter will be addressed. The importance of future follow-up is stressed.

Page 1

R5: The Grand Jury recommends that the CAO immediately institute some form of silent alarm system to alert law enforcement in the event that the counter employees feel threatened.

Page 1

R6: The Grand Jury recommends that members of the BOS, in such areas as planning and code enforcement problems of constituents, go through the protocol of the management structure of the CAO.

Page 1

📋Wayne Brown Correctional Facility Reason for Investigation*

2 pages 14 findings 7 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 14 findings

F1: The Wayne Brown Correctional Facility (WBCF) is under the jurisdiction of the Nevada County Sheriff's Department. Maintenance of the facility is the responsibility of the General Services Department.

F2: WBCF is located on the grounds of the County Administration Center. The Western Nevada County's 911 Emergency Telephone Center is located within the facility.

F3: The State Board of Corrections inspects the facility every 18 months and issues a public report. The last visit was December 17-18, 1997. This report was reviewed by the Grand Jury and no discrepancies were noted.

F4: The facility employs 46 correctional officers, plus four sworn officers, and four sergeants. There were two correctional officer vacancies at the time of inspection, leaving 44 correctional officers employed.

F5: The facility is clean and efficiently operated. The kitchen is staffed by county personnel and inmates, and can serve 1500 meals a day.

F6: In the medical facility, nurses are on duty 24 hours a day under the supervision of a nurse manager. A nurse practitioner is also on staff for 40 hours a week.

F7: Inmates are encouraged to continue their education. High school classes are available and taught by a teacher on contract with Nevada Joint Union High School District. At the time of the Grand Jury's visit, there were 20 independent study students working toward a high school diploma. Twelve ÷. inmates attend General Educational Development (GED) classes, and five passed the GED in 1998. Four inmates received a high school diploma during 1998.

F8: The average daily population is 134 and the maximum capacity of the facility is 230. At the time of inspection the jail housed 122 inmates. The jail is divided into three sections: minimum, medium and maximum security pods. Male and female prisoners are housed separately.

F9: Inmates in the minimum security section are allowed outside the facility under supervision during the day to work for government agencies and nonprofit organizations.

F10: Inmates can be sentenced to WBCF for up to one year. Management stated that there is an 80 percent repeat offender rate.

F11: The fire alarm system was not operational at the time of the first visit. Management instituted special procedures to insure the safety of inmates and staff. The problem was corrected within three days.

F12: The captain in charge reported that there is no routine substance abuse testing of staff due to the high cost. Random testing is available on an individual basis when requested by a supervisor.

F13: The facility uses updated computer equipment to access information from the Department of Justice to screen the inmates. Fingerprint checks of newly arrested inmates are screened by checking these files, and at the time of release. Nevada County is one of two counties in the State using this system.

F14: The Grand Jury found that the problem with the sally port doors mentioned in the last Grand Jury report was corrected. CONCLUSIONS

Additional Recommendations 7

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The Grand Jury recommends that staffing needs and funding be identified and obtained in order to screen all visitors entering the courthouse. The Grand Jury recommends that electronic surveillance equipment be purchased and installed in the

R2: courtrooms and hallways of the building. The Grand Jury recommends the BOS direct the County Administrative Officer to develop a written procedure to assure that future delays caused by lack of planning are eliminated in completing any projects REQUIRED RESPONSES Sheriff Due August 31, 1999 Board of Supervisors Due September 30, 1999 County Administrative Officer Due August 30, 1999 6

R3: The Grand Jury found that some of the critical improvements to the Substation had not been accomplished since the 1997-98 Grand Jury report on the Truckee facility was released. At the time of our investigation, the Truckee Substation Jail was not open full time due to a shortage of jail staff. The jail will not reopen on a full time basis until a minimum staff of six correctional officers is b assigned to comply with BOC standards.

R4: On September 23, 1997, a BOC field representative, in a letter to the Assistant Sheriff, made several recommendations regarding the Truckee Substation. Some of these recommended changes which have not been made are: 7

R5: The Grand Jury researched why the needed changes to the Truckee Substation had not been completed. The list below is in chronological order: 9-23-97 letter from BOC field representative to Assistant Sheriff describing required upgrades to the Truckee substation 9-30-97 letter from a construction firm to Sheriff's office with a detail bid on some requested • work including new fire doors and new dividing walls 10-9-97 electrical company bid on electrical and surveillance equipment needed for the • substation 10-24-97 electrical company bid on dispatch area 10-30-97 safety inspection report by the office of the State Fire Marshall on the Truckee 0 Substation calling for needed repairs to the fire alarm system 11-04-97 work order from an electronic systems company for work on the fire alarm and related 0 systems 11-18-97 letter from Office of the State Fire Marshall, in a follow up inspection, that the fire alarm system was operational and "fire watch" conditions were no longer necessary 11-19-97 letter from Deputy State Marshall, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to . facility captain requesting immediate attention to several issues including electrical, fire alarm system and inoperable exit door 12-11-97 letter from Assistant Sheriff to Facilities Management of Nevada County requesting changes and improvements needed to upgrade the Truckee Substation 3-31-98 construction bid on framing, electrical, sheet rock work, doors, hardware and flooring in 8 dispatch area 4-02-98 second bid on same work 6-19-98 e-mail from Truckee Dispatcher to Commander, Truckee Substation notifying of an electrical failure in the dispatch and 911 center the previous night 8-12-98 through 8-31-98 eleven e-mails between Sheriffs Department, General Services Department and County Risk Manager discussing unsafe working conditions and funding for proposed corrective work 8-31-98 e-mail between Sheriff's Department and General Services Department discussing placement and prices of equipment, including discussion of why plans or specifications are not available 9-15-98 e-mail from Commander, Truckee Substation to Assistant Sheriff discussing diagrams of proposed changes and discussed Grand Jury visit and the Grand Jury's dismay that work requested in 1997 had not even been started 8 9-17-98 letter from County Risk Manager to Sheriff again describing the electrical problems at . the Truckee Substation 9-25-98 e-mail from Assistant Sheriff to Director, General Services asking why the Sheriff's . office is required to define equipment and installation 9-25-98 five more e-mails between the Truckee Substation Commander, the Sheriff's office and General Services on the above issues with no apparent action 10-08-98 e-mail Sheriff's Department to General Services Department about budget transfer of $10,000 for Truckee Substation project 11-03-98 three e-mails, from Sheriffs Department, General Services Department and dispatch • manager of the Truckee Substation, the first discusses the need for Board of Supervisors (BOS) approval. The other two discuss the deplorable work environment at the Truckee Substation. A remodel that had started September 21, 1998 only included American Disabilities Act requirements. This resulted in a hazardous dispatch /911 work area because wiring and exposed flooring had not been properly completed. 11-10-98 Nevada County Board of Supervisors (BOS) minutes, (volume 58, pages 371 through . 373) discusses repairs to the Truckee Substation. This discussion included dollar amounts placed on projects keeping them below County and State mandated levels, to expedite certain purchasing contracts without the necessity of either formal bidding and/or BOS approval. Government Code Section 25500 authorizes a county to employ a Purchasing Agent. If such is done, competitive bidding requirements are generally dispensed with within the area of the Purchasing Agent authority. The State mandated level is below $6500 and the County level is below $10,000.

R6: The Grand Jury found on 12-29-98 during their visit to the Truckee Substation that some of the work projects as per BOC requirements dated 9-23-97 were close to completion. The surveillance and security equipment arrived at the Nevada County Purchasing Department on or about January 29,

R7: The Sheriff's Department should request the CAO to conduct a study to determine an entry pay rate that would attract viable candidates for deputies and correctional officers. 16

📋Community Development Agency Reason for the Investigation The Nevada County Civil Grand Jury received several formal*

8 pages 9 findings 6 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 9 findings

F1: The CDA was formally proposed in 1997 by combining three function-related county departments: Planning, Building and Environmental Health. The Grand Jury could not find any written statement of goals and objectives that had been discussed with employees, much less agreed to by the Board of Supervisors (BOS) and County Administrative Officer (CAO).

F2: The proposed agency was to be managed by a director who reported to the CAO. The agency would be responsible for the existing duties of the departments, i.e. permitting, enforcing state and county laws and regulations (ordinances), land use, planning, building inspections and all activities relating to land development and building.

F3: The CDA concept had been discussed by the BOS and county executive management for several years. They had made visits to neighboring counties where a like concept had been implemented.

F4: The Permit Processing Center (PPC) concept, which preceded the CDA, was designed to accomplish ž , permitting with only one stop at the counter. Cross-training in all areas of the permit process was provided for staff with the goal of streamlining the process, thereby saving the customer time. Employees stated that there was inadequate training for the concept, a lack of effective supervision and problems created by non-compatible computer systems between the three departments.

F5: Dr. Tim Chow was hired by the CAO as the director of the CDA. He was instructed to design a plan that defined the agency and to propose an implementation schedule. His written guidelines were limited to CAO staff reports and BOS minutes. a. The new director was to present his plan to the CAO for review by February 11, 1998, only six weeks after being hired. The design of the plan was left up to the new director, as he was the accepted expert. The review of the plan, as it was developed, was delegated to a deputy administrator. b. A steering committee was formed by the BOS to review the proposed plan as developed by the director. It was made up of two members of the BOS, a deputy administrator and the director of personnel. No written input from the CAO could be found. The three deputy department directors, as well as other employees in the agency, were used as resources for the plan development. c. After numerous revisions, the proposed plan was presented to the BOS on May 12, 1998. The BOS, including the two members who had also served on the steering committee, asked for numerous additional changes that resulted in major revisions. The draft was then returned to the director who made these changes. d. The revised plan was brought back to the BOS on August 4, 1998. It was approved as far as concept was concerned, but implementation was not defined, and additional funding was not granted.

F6: Implementation of the plan was begun in August 1998, and the BOS directed the use of funds from Planning, Building and Environmental Health to finance the required work. The CDA staff testified this action reduced its effectiveness. a. The majority of employees interviewed said that the CDA implementation hindered their ability to perform their job assignments adequately because of poor organization. lack of communication and ineffective leadership. b. All employees interviewed expressed extreme frustration with this new concept. One complaint heard frequently was "No one cares anymore." However, it was found that some employees were reluctant to accept changes in their roles necessitated by implementation of the CDA plan. -

F7: Several interviewees testified that some members of the BOS interacted directly with employees after plan approval, making various suggestions for changes to the plan. In doing this, they bypassec- the CAO and department heads and caused considerable confusion. ţ.,

F8: Dr. Chow testified he had been told throughout his tenure that he was performing his assignment well. However, on November 27, 1998, he was asked for his resignation. Dr. Chow complied. The Building Department Deputy Director was appointed Interim CDA Director.

F9: On April 13, 1999, a letter was sent to the BOS from the CAO and Assistant County Administrator recommending the implementation and updating of the revised CDA consolidation plan. The BOS approved the revised plan and set milestones for subsequent reporting CONCLUSIONS

Additional Recommendations 6

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The Grand Jury recommends that the BOS agrees to a written set of goals before proceeding with any further implementation of the CDA plan. These goals should explain clearly what is expected of the plan in terms of its providing economy of time, effort, cost savings and other features.

R2: The Grand Jury recommends that the BOS allow the CAO to carry out the review and consolidation plan without interference, thus allowing the plan to proceed as designed without further wasting of county funds. RESPONSES Board of Supervisors Due September 30, 1999 . Respuse COUNTY OF NEVADA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 950 Maidu Avenue • Nevada City, California 95959-8617 Telephone: (530) 265-1480 • FAX (530) 265-1234 E-Mail: www.co.nevada.ca us/ncbos/clerk Peter Van Zant, 1st District Karen Knecht, 2nd District BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Bruce Conklin, 3rd District Elizabeth Martin, 4th District Sam Dardick, 5th District September 28, 1999 Cathy R. Thompson Clerk of the Board The Honorable Carl Bryan Presiding Judge, Nevada County Courts Nevada County Courthouse 201 Church Street Nevada City CA 95959 SUBJECT: Board of Supervisors Responses to the 1998-99 Nevada County Civil Grand Jury Final Report Dear Judge Bryan: The attached responses by the Board of Supervisors to the 1998-99 Nevada County Civil Grand Jury Final Report are submitted as required by California Penal Code 933(b). These responses were reviewed and approved by the Board of Supervisors at their regular meetings on September 14 and 28, 1999, and are believed to provide a full response to the Grand Jury's

R5: a. Partially agree. The CDA Director was granted more time to prepare his plan and it was subsequently presented to the Board on May 12, 1998. b. Partially agree. The Chairman-appointed committee of two supervisors and the County Administrator was formed by direction of the Board Chairman and was not appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The County Administrator and staff worked closely with the CDA Director and provided written input to him on each draft proposal. 09/28/99 c. Agree. d. Partially agree. The CDA proposal was fully funded in the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Budget, but implementation actions were delayed until final budget adoption in late September 1998.

R6: a. Cannot agree or disagree. The Board has no knowledge of what was said to the Grand Jury b. Cannot agree or disagree. The Board has no knowledge of what was said to the Grand Jury. į Refinement of organizational changes implemented with the Permit Processing Center and continuing with the formation and development of the CDA has since overcome the initial resistance to change expressed by some department employees directly to their department/agency head and the County Administrator.

R7: Cannot agree or disagree. The Board has no knowledge of what was said to the Grand Jury.

R9: Partially agree. The revised CDA plan was presented to the Board on April 13, 1999, and accepted. Recommendations:

📋Nevada County Sheriff's Office Reason for the Investigation The Nevada County Civil Grand Jury found no recent review*

18 pages 11 findings 9 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 11 findings

F1: There are five areas for evidence holding in two different buildings in Nevada City. The Grand Jury noted in the inspection of one evidence holding area in Nevada City, where large items are held, county maintenance employees have uncontrolled access for building maintenance purposes.. There is a secure evidence room with lockers and two steel shipping containers for evidence holding at the Truckee Substation.

F2: The sergeant in charge of all investigations other than narcotics was interviewed. The two investigative sections are separate as both require unique training. There are four full-time investigators and one part-time. Deputies assigned to this section of investigations are rotated to other assignments every four years. Investigative training of deputies is limited due to the cost. A computer is used to access databases for any information concerning a suspect.. III OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES

F3: There are two Sheriff employees in charge of evidence holding in Nevada City and one in Truckee. 1 1 A log is maintained on all evidence when it is first delivered to the evidence holding area. Entries are made whenever items are removed and returned to the holding area. All entries to the log about evidence movement are manual. A computer report is available from the courts when a case is adjudicated; however, this report does not advise the evidence management staff when evidence can be disposed.

F4: Evidence seized by a court warrant requires a court order to return the evidence to the property owner. Other evidence has varying holding periods. Firearms can be held for up to 10 years. Large items may be photographed and then returned. However, the owner can not dispose of the item until all legal action is completed. Illegal drugs are kept in state specified quantities until court actions are completed, then either burned in state licensed incinerators or disposed of by a state authorized chemical laboratory.

F5: A licensed gun dealer is authorized to dispose of legal firearms. Legal weapons seized by the Sheriff may be sold to the dealer and he is authorized to sell the weapons. Illegal weapons seized by the Sheriff are destroyed when the court case is completed.

F6: Budget requests for improved evidence holding facilities have not been made during recent County budget cycles. The Sheriff's Department has developed a plan to improve the inventory system for evidence management.

F7: An in-house audit of evidence was conducted in February 1998 by request from the Sheriff's office. The audit was based on a random selection of cases from the years 1993 through 1997. The audit found different procedures in use at Nevada City and Truckee. The audit did not find that evidence had been lost; however there were five cases with serious discrepancies and 18 with minor discrepancies in the 52 cases selected from evidence held in Nevada City. The audit found one case with a serious discrepancy and two with minor discrepancies in the 19 cases selected from the evidence held in Truckee. "Serious" discrepancies are defined as those cases where items were missing or evidence was in custody after documentation stated it had been released to an insurance company. "Minor" discrepancies are those cases where evidence documentation was not completed to support final disposition. The audit recommended standardized procedures for all county evidence holding areas and the development of formal procedures and forms to record property log notations. The audit found written procedures for evidence management at the Truckee Substation but no written procedures in Nevada City evidence management. The audit recommended a regular interval of re-keying of property rooms and re-coding of the The major type of illegal drug in Nevada County is methamphetamine. Marijuana was a major problem in the 1980s. However, a turning point in control happened about 1986 due to rigorous enforcement and destruction of growing areas. The narcotics investigation staff are required to use county purchased vehicles that are retained up ٠ to five years.

F8: The Sheriff agrees with the finding. At this time, the walk-through metal detector is going into use at the main building entry.

F9: The Sheriff agrees with the finding.

F10: The Sheriff's staff did not agree to the installation of these doors; the doors could not be staffed safely with the available officers. The issue of public safety during inmate transport has not been an issue. The issues that needed to be addressed concerned security of inmates (keeping them free from harm by outsiders or other inmates), and the availability of contraband to inmates while they are being moved through public corridors.

F11: The Sheriff agrees with the finding. Conclusions

Additional Recommendations 9

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The Sheriff's Department should develop a plan for a single evidence facility for Nevada City evidence storage.

R2: The Sheriff's Department should purchase and implement a computer-based evidence management system with common procedures to reduce the errors that are currently a part of the manual logging and management of evidence.

R3: Access to evidence holding areas should be controlled, preventing unauthorized access by all persons except those Sheriff's department employees with responsibility for evidence.

R4: Procedures to periodically re-key access doors and re-code alarms to evidence holding areas should be implemented without delay

R5: The County Administrative Officer (CAO) should direct the County General Services Department to __ investigate, with the Sheriff's Department, potential benefits of using leased cars vs purchased cars for narcotics law enforcement.

R6: The CAO should direct the County General Services Department to develop, with the Sheriff's Department, a cooperative process in the design and planning of future changes in the Sheriff's facilities.

R7: The Sheriff's Department should request the CAO to conduct a study to determine an entry pay rate that would attract viable candidates for deputies and correctional officers. _

R8: Partially disagree. A walk-through metal detector was installed at the main courthouse entrance in conjunction with the card lock door alarm and security system upgrade and is now regularly monitored by assigned courthouse security staff.

R11: Disagree. A card lock door alarm and security system was installed on all courthouse security doors after the Grand jury report was published. Recommendations:

September 22, 1999 — Juvenile Hall Reason for the Investigation

7 pages 9 findings 2 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 9 findings

F1: The Juvenile Hall was built in 1955 and has been modified several times since then, responding to Grand Jury reports and Board of Corrections (BOC) recommendations. The facility has a capacity for 19 wards. The most recent modifications were adding unbreakable glass in the classroom, adding a third shower and bolting down of the dining room tables.

Page 1

F2: The Juvenile Hall is constantly at or near capacity. On any given day there are as many as six to ten sentenced wards awaiting space in the Juvenile Hall. When capacity of the Juvenile Hall is reached, those options for out placement available to the courts and probation department are foster homes, group homes, California Youth Authority, Crystal Creek Boys Ranch, release to a guardian or electronic monitoring. Electronic monitoring is handled by a private monitoring company. If a juvenile ward violates the prescribed use of the monitors, the company alerts the Juvenile Hall personnel.

Page 1

F3: Each Thursday the Juvenile Hall staff holds a meeting to determine which of the current wards could be released early if the facility exceeds the 19-bed capacity with new arrivals that are brought into the facility during the weekend.

Page 1

F4: There are now plans for a new Juvenile Hall. A new location has been placed under contract and the county has applied for and received a state grant for construction of a new facility.

Page 1

F5: The ratio of female to male wards is increasing. Recently, for a short period of time, the ratio was 50 £ 1 percent female to male. The average age of juvenile wards is 15 to 16 with some as young as 11. There is also an increase in the violent nature of the wards. According to Juvenile Hall, 30 percent of the first-time offenders are returned for a second offense. Again according to Juvenile Hall staff, 60 percent of second-time offenders are returned for another offense.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: With a goal to reduce the high rate of repeat offenders, a program to provide individual counseling to the wards should be implemented.

F6: The Juvenile Hall provides visitation for adult family members twice a week. This can be a stressful time for wards who do not receive family visitors. All juvenile wards are assigned a case coordinator to help them through these critical periods.

Page 1

F7: Wards receive three hours of classroom instruction and one hour of physical education per day. The school employs a full-time certified teacher on a 183 day standard Nevada Joint Union High School District seven hour a day teacher's contract.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Probation Department and Nevada Joint Union High School District should increase the school hours for more meaningful education. This should be accomplished before the beginning of the fall school term of 1999.

F8: The facility staff maintain a library for wards' recreational reading. These books are obtained from contributions of individuals and local bookstores.

Page 2

F9: A licensed social worker meets with the wards for group counseling once a week. There are no vocational education programs available to the wards. CONCLUSIONS

Page 2

November 10, 1998 — Interim Report County Personnel Contract Signing Reason for the Investigation The Nevada County Civil Grand Jury

9 pages 9 findings 2 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 9 findings

F1: The Grand Jury learned from testimony that discussions with the County Administrative Officer and different supervisors relating to an extension of the County Administrative Officer's contract commenced in mid-1998. There was disagreement among the Supervisors as to the form and content of an extension.

Page 1

F2: A closed session employment review of the County Administrative Officer was held November 10, 1998. From testimony, the Grand Jury determined no agreement was reached regarding the details of a contract extension. A second closed session with the County Administrative Officer was held on December 8, 1998. The chairman was absent from this session. The four supervisors who were present at the closed session all testified they expected a draft contract would be returned at a later date for their review and approval, prior to execution.

Page 1

F4: On December 15, 1998, a contract extension was executed by the chairman and the County Administrative Officer. None of the other supervisors were aware of this action. Testimony to the Grand Jury revealed that no authority for the execution had been voted on during the closed session 4.0 held December 8, 1998.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The Board of Supervisors immediately and publicly implement new procedures that will eliminate the ر يا possibility of this type of situation occurring again.

F5: The two board members who left the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1999, testified they had not seen the contract signed on December 15 until their interview with the Grand Jury on February 22,

Page 1

F6: The revised contract as extended and signed on December 15, 1998, was received by the clerk of the Board of Supervisors on January 15, 1999. The Grand Jury learned from testimony that no vote had been taken concerning the contract extension during the December 8, 1998 closed session meeting.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The Board of Supervisors immediately and publicly implement new procedures that will eliminate the ر يا possibility of this type of situation occurring again.

F7: The clerk of the Board of Supervisors testified she informed the current chairman of the December 15, 1998 contract within two to three days of its receipt on January 15, 1999. The current chairman publicly reported the execution of the contract on January 26, 1999, however there was no report of any vote as required by law. This was 42 days after the contract agreement was signed.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (2)

R1: The Grand Jury recommends the Nevada County district attorney determine if there has been any violation of the Brown Act.

R2: The Board of Supervisors immediately and publicly implement new procedures that will eliminate the ر يا possibility of this type of situation occurring again.

F8: The Supervisors present at the December 8, 1998 closed session all testified they did not at any time vote approval of the contract as executed.

Page 1

Related Recommendations (2)

R1: The Grand Jury recommends the Nevada County district attorney determine if there has been any violation of the Brown Act.

R2: The Board of Supervisors immediately and publicly implement new procedures that will eliminate the ر يا possibility of this type of situation occurring again.

F9: The county counsel testified he was never asked for any legal review on the contract or the process of execution. CONCLUSIONS

Page 1

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Grand Jury recommends the Nevada County district attorney determine if there has been any violation of the Brown Act.

F1999: One of the current members of the Board of Supervisors who attended the December 8th meeting testified the first time she had seen the contract after the signing was during the week prior to the interview by the Grand Jury in late February 1999.

Page 1

November 04, 1998 — Nevada County Sheriff's Substation at Truckee Reason for the Investigation*

16 pages 11 findings 9 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 11 findings

F1: The Truckee Substation was built as a multi-use government building in 1964. At that time this building was used not only as the jail, but was also used as the courtroom, District Attorney's Office, Probation Department and Sheriff's office. Since 1992 the building has been used solely for the Sheriff's Department and since incorporation of the City also serves as the Police Department for Truckee under contract with the Sheriff's Department for police services.

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Grand Jury recommends that the BOS direct the County Administrative Officer to develop a work plan document that must be used for all requests for maintenance and remodels that exceed monetary amounts determined by the county.

F2: The Grand Jury found the substation to be in noncompliance with BOC guidelines relating to female detainees dating back to 1991.

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The Grand Jury recommends that all facility changes using the document defined above, must have detailed formal plans and a specific timeline for completion. The originating department must state a priority for the proposed task and a status-reporting schedule for management. This priority requires coordination between affected departments before changing the priority level.

F3: The Grand Jury found that some of the critical improvements to the Substation had not been accomplished since the 1997-98 Grand Jury report on the Truckee facility was released. At the time of our investigation, the Truckee Substation Jail was not open full time due to a shortage of jail staff. The jail will not reopen on a full time basis until a minimum staff of six correctional officers is ~ assigned to comply with BOC standards.

Related Recommendations (1)

R3: The Grand Jury recommends that the BOS demand timely accountability from all department managers and directors involved in correcting any potentially hazardous condition that places the County, its employees or its citizens at risk.

F4: On September 23, 1997, a BOC field representative, in a letter to the Assistant Sheriff, made several

Related Recommendations (1)

R4: The Sheriff agrees with the finding The Sheriff agrees with the finding.

F5: The Grand Jury researched why the needed changes to the Truckee Substation had not been completed. The list below is in chronological order: 9-23-97 letter from BOC field representative to Assistant Sheriff describing required upgrades to the Truckee substation 9-30-97 letter from a construction firm to Sheriff's office with a detail bid on some requested work including new fire doors and new dividing walls 10-9-97 electrical company bid on electrical and surveillance equipment needed for the substation 10-24-97 electrical company bid on dispatch area 10-30-97 safety inspection report by the office of the State Fire Marshall on the Truckee Substation calling for needed repairs to the fire alarm system 11-04-97 work order from an electronic systems company for work on the fire alarm and related • systems 11-18-97 letter from Office of the State Fire Marshall, in a follow up inspection, that the fire alarm system was operational and "fire watch" conditions were no longer necessary 11-19-97 letter from Deputy State Marshall, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to facility captain requesting immediate attention to several issues including electrical, fire alarm system and inoperable exit door 12-11-97 letter from Assistant Sheriff to Facilities Management of Nevada County requesting changes and improvements needed to upgrade the Truckee Substation 3-31-98 construction bid on framing, electrical, sheet rock work, doors, hardware and flooring in dispatch area 4-02-98 second bid on same work 6-19-98 e-mail from Truckee Dispatcher to Commander, Truckee Substation notifying of an

Related Recommendations (1)

R5: to financial considerations. The Sheriff will work with the CAO relative possible implementation, and conduct a study of this recommendation within the next six months, if not sooner. The Sheriff supports this recommendation and will work with the CAO relative

F6: The Grand Jury found on 12-29-98 during their visit to the Truckee Substation that some of the work projects as per BOC requirements dated 9-23-97 were close to completion. The surveillance and security equipment arrived at the Nevada County Purchasing Department on or about January 29,

Related Recommendations (1)

R6: possible implementation. The Sheriff supports this recommendation and will work with the CAO relative

F7: The Sheriff disagrees partially with the finding. The finding stated, "...there were five cases with serious discrepancies and 18 with minor discrepancies in the 52 cases selected from evidence in Nevada City." The evidence technician assigned at the time of the audit submitted a report in response to the audit resolving all but one issue. The audit also recommended standardized procedures for all county evidence holding areas and the development of formal procedures and forms to record property log notations. The audit found written procedures for evidence management at the Truckee Substation but no written procedures in Nevada City evidence management. The Sheriff's Office is currently in the process of updating the written procedures for both facilities. Lastly, the audit recommended a regular interval of re-keying property rooms and re-coding the alarms in each of the holding areas. The audit recommended correction of the situation where county maintenance employees have uncontrolled access to an evidence area. Both of these issues are also in the process of being corrected. Findings - Investigations 1. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. However, as a point of clarification, the Sheriff's Office coordinates a narcotics task force that is comprised of one sergeant, three sheriff's deputies, one secretary, and one Nevada City Police Officer. In addition, as of this date, one California Highway Patrol Officer has been added to the task force. į 2. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. However, as a point of clarification, the investigative unit is comprised of one sergeant, four full-time investigators, one secretary, and one part-time investigator. Other Findings 1-3 The Sheriff agrees with the findings. Conclusions 1. The Sheriff disagrees partially with the conclusion. The current system is comprised of several separate storage areas, which can place an undue burden on staff in charge of evidence holding. By nature of the locations and size of the storage areas, the maintaining of evidence is staff intensive, and results in a waste of staff time and a decreased level of service to the community. However, it is important to point out that as cumbersome as the system exists, the integrity of the evidence has been maintained. The evidence system is fully functional. There certainly is room for improvement and additional space is needed. However, the evidence system is functioning as it should albeit inadequate. Lastly, in an effort to improve the existing system, the Sheriff's Office has implemented suggested changes relative updating current policies and procedures as they pertain to the handling of evidence, as well as uncontrolled access problems that were identified by the Grand Jury. However, I feel it important to clarify that the Sheriff's Office's evidence technicians do not allow evidence to leave the facility without proper documentation. 2-4 The Sheriff agrees with the conclusions.

Related Recommendations (1)

R7: The Sheriff disagrees partially with the finding. The finding stated, "...there were five cases with serious discrepancies and 18 with minor discrepancies in the 52 cases selected from evidence in Nevada City." The evidence technician assigned at the time of the audit submitted a report in response to the audit resolving all but one issue. The audit also recommended standardized procedures for all county evidence holding areas and the development of formal procedures and forms to record property log notations. The audit found written procedures for evidence management at the Truckee Substation but no written procedures in Nevada City evidence management. The Sheriff's Office is currently in the process of updating the written procedures for both facilities. Lastly, the audit recommended a regular interval of re-keying property rooms and re-coding the alarms in each of the holding areas. The audit recommended correction of the situation where county maintenance employees have uncontrolled access to an evidence area. Both of these issues are also in the process of being corrected.

F8: The Sheriff agrees with the finding. At this time, the walk-through metal detector is going into use at the main building entry.

Related Recommendations (1)

R8: Partially disagree. A walk-through metal detector was installed at the main courthouse entrance in conjunction with the card lock door alarm and security system upgrade and is now regularly monitored by assigned courthouse security staff.

F9: The Sheriff agrees with the finding.

F10: The Sheriff's staff did not agree to the installation of these doors; the doors could not be staffed safely with the available officers. The issue of public safety during ı inmate transport has not been an issue. The issues that needed to be addressed concerned security of inmates (keeping them free from harm by outsiders or other inmates), and the availability of contraband to inmates while they are being moved through public corridors.

F11: The Sheriff agrees with the finding. Conclusions The Sheriff agrees with the conclusion. Currently the Sheriff, his staff and the

Related Recommendations (1)

R11: Disagree. A card lock door alarm and security system was installed on all courthouse security doors after the Grand jury report was published. Recommendations:

📋September 17, 1998 — Grass Valley City Government Reason for the Investigation The Nevada County Civil Grand Jury may investigate the*

8 pages 11 findings 10 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 11 findings

F1: The City has hired its first Community Development Director who will supervise the planning, building and future developments of the City. A new police chief, fire chief and public works and park superintendent were recently hired. The City is undertaking several projects involving annexation and development before the completion of the updated general plan. Future annexations will increase the City's approximate acreage from 2500 to 4500 acres.

F2: Some employees feel pressured by increased responsibilities and decreased recognition. They are not encouraged to give input to management regarding their areas of expertise. The City has managed to operate within its budget at the cost of reducing staff, training programs and motivational incentives. City employees are to be commended for their response to the downsizing.

F3: The 1982 General Plan has been modified from time to time and is in the process of being revised with completion expected by July 1999.

F4: The City has recently completed the reconstruction and landscaping of Main Street. Preparation for the street's resurfacing involved additional costs because of unforeseen below-surface problems.

F5: The City is currently involved in several other projects, including planning for a hotel/ conference center, a major upgrading of City Hall and a new combination fire station/classroom facility at Sierra College.

F6: A goals and objectives plan is formulated by the City at the beginning of each fiscal year with updated information provided periodically.

F7: Some City employees have expressed concern that the City administration in its determination to achieve its goals is pressuring its workers into stressful conditions. While the City has kept a balanced budget, staff has been reduced, causing some managers to be responsible for several departments. Various department employees expressed the need for more administrative support and improved communication.

F8: The City's present sewage capacity is 1.72 million gallons a day, average dry weather flow, and the City is operating at this capacity. Expansion of the Wastewater Treatment Plant will provide a planned capacity of 2.78 million gallons. Expansion is due to begin in April or May of 1999, and is scheduled to be completed within two years at a cost of 9.3 million dollars.

F9: The City, through its recently initiated newsletter, Grass Valley City Messenger, invited its citizens to participate on various boards, commissions and committees. A survey was conducted in which the public was asked to express their opinion of several areas of city performance. While the City has recorded the public responses, it has yet to publish another Grass Valley City Messenger presenting this information to the public.

F10: The City conducted a police recruitment program in the fall of 1998 that produced only eight applications. The statewide average is 100 applications to fill one vacancy. An effort had been made to improve the recruitment process, but the procedure had to be repeated because of the poor response. At the time of this review, the City had no female police officers.

F11: Currently, the City and Nevada County operate separate animal shelters. The Nevada County Agricultural Commissioner has jurisdiction over the county animal shelter, and the police chief has jurisdiction over the city animal shelter. Informal talks on combining some of the operations have taken place without resolution. CONCLUSIONS فر ۽

Additional Recommendations 10

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The City should finalize the update of the General Plan before continuing its aggressive annexation and development plans.

R2: The City Administrator and department managers should develop a plan to balance departmental workload and improve internal communications.

R3: The City should publish its newsletter, Grass Valley City Messenger, on a quarterly basis for better communication between the administration and the community.

R4: The incorporated cities and the county should coordinate their law enforcement recruitment effort to create a larger pool of qualified applicants. Cooperative meetings have already started on this subject, and the Grand Jury recommends that they continue.

R5: The City and Nevada County should re-establish formal discussions on consolidating or combining their respective animal control shelters. RESPONSES City Administrator Due August, 30, 1999 Grass Valley City Council Due September 30, 1999 Rec 8/13/99 US. CITY COUNCIL BILL HULLENDER, MAYOR LINDA STEVENS, VICE MAYOR PATTI INGRAM GERARD TASSONE lev JOHN A. TAYLOR GENE HAROLDSEN A CENTENNIAL CITY CITY ADMINISTRATOR July 14, 1999 125 EAST MAIN STREET Honorable Carl Bryan II GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945 (530) 274-4310 FAX: 274-4399 Presiding Judge of the Nevada County Courts 201 Church Street Nevada City, CA 95959 RE: Response to the 1998-99 Grand Jury Report Your Honor, This letter is the City of Grass Valley's response to the 1998-1999 Grand Jury Report. We appreciate the interest that members of the Grand Jury had in the City, the time that went into their review and the efforts made in preparing this report. Because of the number of findings, conclusions and recommendations, each of which deserve to be carefully reviewed and commented upon, we have responded in the attached detailed report. This response was discussed and approved by City Council at its July 13, 1999 meeting: If you have any questions, please contact us. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Gene Haroldsen Bill Hullender City Administrator Mayor Attachment: Detailed Response to 1998-1999 Grand Jury Report City Council CC: Lorraine Jewitt-Burdick, Nevada County Clerk / Recorder Claude Biddle, City Attorney John Foster, Chief of Police Rudi Golnik, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Kyle Kollar, Community Development Director Bobbi Poznik, City Clerk E-mail: council&admin@cityof.grass-valley.ca.us www.cityof.grass-valley.ca.us CITY OF GRASS VALLEY DETAILED RESPONSE TO THE 1998-1999 GRAND JURY REPORT

R6: The State Health Department has inspection and approval responsibility for work performed on NID's domestic water treatment facilities and delivery systems. Engineering inspections and approval for work on irrigation water systems is the responsibility of NID. Buildings and construction work on non-water systems for NID's use is subject to county building codes and inspections.

R7: The historical financial information from NID showed that NID has averaged an annual rate increase of 3.8 percent for treated water users and 3 percent for irrigated water users.

R8: The district makes water sales outside the district. However, these are subject to year to year contracts and are subject to either reduction or termination if water is not available for district users. NID forecasts water needs in the district by the use of the county's master plan, county building permit history, NID history, building proposals by developers and any other sources available to management.

R9: Construction work on water systems funded by NID do not require competitive bidding. However, NID Board of Directors have mandated that competitive bidding will be used on all such projects. Construction work that is funded by the State and Federal governments require competitive bids and use of prevailing wage rates.

R10: NID has reserved funds for unknown contingencies, such as Federal energy de-regulation, re- licensing power plants and a contract re-negotiation with PG&E due in 2013. FINANCIAL

📋January 02, 1998 — Human Services Agency Reason for the Investigation The Human Services Agency was recently formed by a consolidation of

13 pages 8 findings 3 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 8 findings

F1: The Deputy Director of Mental Health, the Deputy Director of Public Health and the Deputy Director of Social Services all report directly to the Director of Human Services Agency who in turn reports to the County Administrative Officer.

F2: The agency was formed by the Board of Supervisors in 1997 to incorporate the Public Health, Mental Health and Social Services departments under one director. The reason given for the consolidation was to provide improved service to the clients of each department. Many of the mandated programs in the agency are administered by two or more of the departments.

F3: The agency Director has been in the position since January 2, 1998. She also acted as the Deputy Director of Social Services from January until October of that year.

F4: There are about 200 employees in the agency. The number of employees fluctuates with the amount of funding provided each year by the state and federal governments. The budget is about $22 million, mostly from the state and federal governments. 26

F5: The three departments in the agency are located at six separate geographical sites. The agency has no formal plan for permanent physical consolidation of the departments. Modular buildings are being installed at the Health Education Welfare site to house the fiscal division for all three departments of the agency. Another modular building will be installed for Mental Health.

F6: The Director, with the approval of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Officer, has a two-step plan for organization of the three departments. The re-organization of the agency is now in the first step with completion of step two expected within three years. When the transition is completed, the agency will be comprised of Central Intake Managed Care, Adult Services, Child and Family Services, Community Programs and Fiscal Administration divisions.

F7: There is a new task force concept in place for addressing problems in the county. The purpose is to involve all three departments in each case as required. The agency is also developing Central Intake, where clients can have all their initial needs addressed at one place. MENTAL HEALTH

F8: The department has a new Deputy Director, hired in October of 1998. The prior deputy retired in December 1997. The nine-month delay in hiring the replacement was due to difficulty in locating candidates that met the Director's standards. CONCLUSIONS HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

Additional Recommendations 3

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: The Grand Jury recommends that the agency produce a formal, comprehensive plan for physical consolidation of the departments. The plan should be made available to the Board of Supervisors within an acceptable time line not to exceed one year.

R2: The Grand Jury recommends that morale problems in Public Health be addressed by the Director and reported through the CAO to the Board of Supervisors within three months.

R3: The Grand Jury recommends that the staff turnover issue in Social Services be addressed by the Director and reported to the Board of Supervisors within three months.

📋Nevada County Courthouse and Holding Facility Reason for the Investigation

13 pages 1 findings 3 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 1 findings

F4: 5. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. 6. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. Budget requests for improved evidence holding facilities will be made during the next budget cycle. A study of current space, future needs for space and specialized equipment needs has recently been completed. A report outlining such needs will be submitted with this report. The plan to improve the inventory system is in process consisting of updating current policies, creating a written procedure for evidence handling by technicians and involving additional manpower resources. 7. The Sheriff disagrees partially with the finding. The finding stated, "...there were five cases with serious discrepancies and 18 with minor discrepancies in the 52 cases selected from evidence in Nevada City." The evidence technician assigned at the time of the audit submitted a report in response to the audit resolving all but one issue. The audit also recommended standardized procedures for all county evidence holding areas and the development of formal procedures and forms to record property log notations. The audit found written procedures for evidence management at the Truckee Substation but no written procedures in Nevada City evidence management. The Sheriff's Office is currently in the process of updating the written procedures for both facilities. Lastly, the audit recommended a regular interval of re-keying property rooms and re-coding the alarms in each of the holding areas. The audit recommended correction of the situation where county maintenance employees have uncontrolled access to an evidence area. Both of these issues are also in the process of being corrected. Findings – Investigations 1. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. However, as a point of clarification, the Sheriff's Office coordinates a narcotics task force that is comprised of one sergeant, three sheriff's deputies, one secretary, and one Nevada City Police Officer. In addition, as of this date, one California Highway Patrol Officer has been added to the task force. ţ 2. The Sheriff agrees with the finding. However, as a point of clarification, the investigative unit is comprised of one sergeant, four full-time investigators, one secretary, and one part-time investigator. Other Findings 1-3 The Sheriff agrees with the findings. Conclusions 1. The Sheriff disagrees partially with the conclusion. The current system is comprised of several separate storage areas, which can place an undue burden on staff in charge of evidence holding. By nature of the locations and size of the storage areas, the maintaining of evidence is staff intensive, and results in a waste of staff time and a decreased level of service to the community. However, it is important to point out that as cumbersome as the system exists, the integrity of the evidence has been maintained. The evidence system is fully functional. There certainly is room for improvement and additional space is needed. However, the evidence system is functioning as it should albeit inadequate. Lastly, in an effort to improve the existing system, the Sheriff's Office has implemented suggested changes relative updating current policies and procedures as they pertain to the handling of evidence, as well as uncontrolled access problems that were identified by the Grand Jury. However, I feel it important to clarify that the Sheriff's Office's evidence technicians do not allow evidence to leave the facility without proper documentation. 2-4 The Sheriff agrees with the conclusions.

Page 6

📋Tahoe Forest Hospital District Reason for the Investigation*

2 pages 14 findings 15 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 14 findings

F1: The district was formed by a vote of the citizens within the proposed district in 1949. The district receives tax revenues from property that is within the district boundaries.

F2: The district boundaries are entirely within California. The boundaries have been expanded by ballot votes five times since the original formation. The district has five directors elected from within the district boundaries.

F3: The area served by Tahoe Forest Hospital extends beyond the district boundaries. This service area includes Nevada County, Sierra County, the eastern portion of Placer County and the Incline Village area of the State of Nevada.

F4: Operating under Nevada state law, the Incline Village Health Center provides health services for the area in and around Incline Village. The center was purchased by the district from a private organization on March 1, 1996. There is a five-year plan in effect to establish the center's optimal use before the board and management make a decision to invest further. Approximately 65% of the patients who first receive treatment at the Incline Village Health Center continue any necessary i. additional treatment at Tahoe Forest Hospital.

F5: Tahoe Forest Hospital has 35 acute-care beds and 37 long-term beds. The facility is located in a resort area where sports injuries are common. Consequently, much of its revenue is generated in the Emergency Department. As is customary in hospitals, physicians in private practice are extended the privilege, at the hospital's discretion, of admitting their patients to the hospital for care. These doctors comprise the hospital medical staff.

F6: The hospital district has an annual operating budget of approximately $36.8 million for fiscal year ending June 30, 1998, based on information provided to the Grand Jury. The district earned $37.4 million from all sources. The hospital district uses a "cost distribution system" that identifies cost and earnings separately for each of the Truckee and Incline Village facilities. The district has a staff of 400 employees in full and part time positions. The full time equivalent number of employees is approximately 300.

F7: In an effort to attract employees, the hospital operates a child-care facility for ages four months through middle school. This day-care facility is available to the community as well as the staff.

F8: A video demonstrating the value of exercise for seniors has been produced by a group that included a hospital employee who was acting as an independent agent. The video, which displays the hospital's logo, is being marketed by the video's producers. There is a royalty agreement between the marketer and the hospital which at this time has created no revenue for the hospital. The hospital administrator stated that Tahoe Forest Hospital incurred no costs in the production of the video. CONCLUSIONS

F9: Each school visited has administration, teachers and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the numbers for the day visited by the Grand Jury.

F10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in the 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98.

F11: There is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system.

F12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the schools studied in this report.

F13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. 44

F14: On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track. Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It also approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School using Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS

Additional Recommendations 15

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: Nevada Joint Union High School District's (NJUHSD) Mission Statement is "to provide educational opportunities in a variety of settings for ALL students that will allow them the chance to reach their full potential and prepare them for work and higher learning with the skills needed to succeed."

R2: Alternative education provides programs to those students whose needs are not met by the larger traditional high schools. NJUHSD operates one alternative, five continuation and two community schools with a total of 642 students. Another 200 students attend the independent study program. The total high school population of all high schools in January 1999 was 4,652. This number includes Nevada Union and Bear River high schools, but does not include adult education.

R3: A director of alternative education position was created and filled in January 1999 to oversee all of NJUHSD's alternative, continuing, community, and adult education programs. Further changes are being made as this report is written.

R4: An alternative school is defined by Education Code Section 58500 as a school open to all students districtwide that will maximize the opportunity for improvement of the general school curriculum by innovative methods and ideas. Funding is higher per pupil at $4,490.74 compared to traditional high school funding at $4,100.54 per student per year. The alternative high school in Nevada County is Sierra Mountain. 43

R5: A continuation school is defined by Education Code Section 48430 as a school designed to meet the educational needs of each pupil including work study, regional occupation programs, career counseling and job placement services. Funding is at $4,490.74 per student per year. There are five continuation schools in Nevada County: Silver Springs, Pioneer, Nevada Union Tech, Sierra Central, and Empire.

R6: A community school is defined by Education Code Section 48660 as a school for pupils who have been expelled, are on probation, or have been referred by a school attendance review board. The goal is to return these students to their home school. Funding is higher: Earle Jamieson and Sugar Loaf Mountain School (Juvenile Hall) funding is $6,499.15 per student.

R7: Juvenile court schools are mandated by Education Code Section 48645 to provide 240 minutes per day of classroom instruction by certified teachers. Juvenile Hall meets this requirement by providing 180 minutes of classroom instruction plus 60 minutes of physical education. The 1995-96 Grand Jury recommended longer hours for the youth at the Juvenile Hall. This recommendation was not followed.

R8: The county superintendent of schools operates one community day school for students in grades 6, 7, 8 called the 3 R's School (3 R's = Rehabilitate, Renew, Reinstate).

R9: Each school visited has administration, teachers and classified staff assigned to the program. Student population reported hereafter reflects the numbers for the day visited by the Grand Jury.

R10: Drug and alcohol related incidents reported in the NJUHSD have more than doubled from 32 reports in the 1996-97 school year to 68 in 1997-98.

R11: There is no formal tracking of students' academic histories as they move through the school system.

R12: Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) scores reported to the state and published in the local newspaper do not include the schools studied in this report.

R13: Following is a chart detailing information on each school visited. ALTERNATIVE CONTINUATION COMMUNITY Sierra Mountain 3 R’S Silver Springs Located at 12338 Located at 112 Nevada City Located at 140 Park Ave., . Hwy., Nevada City for Grass Valley for grades McCourtney Rd., Grass grades 6-8. 9-12. Valley for grades 9-12. 156 students and 7 2/5 15 students, 1 full-time 250 students, 15 full-time . teacher with 1 instructional teachers. Graduated 17 in teachers and volunteers. assistant and volunteer tutor. Graduated 22 in June 1998. June 1998. Goal is to return students to All classes necessary for a All classes necessary for a • . high school diploma. their neighborhood school. high school diploma. Curriculum of mini-lessons Schedule of 6 weeks in class Young Parent Program on . • . and 1 week off, 6 weeks site offers infant/toddler on various topics culminating with a project summer session. development center, health and test. Basic Sierra Tech Partnership counseling, transportation • Comprehensive Skills Test and food services, parenting Academy: program on-site taken monthly. Homework education and networking with 50 students from grades nightly. with community agencies. 11-12 in conjunction with 7 Students required to wear manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state . . uniforms. funds that exceed the ADA Independent Study Program . School day is 6 hours (as of on site for 200 additional monies. Jan.1999) with breakfast and students; 74 graduated in Pioneer lunch provided.

R14: On April 20, 1999, the NJUHSD Board approved reorganization of most existing alternative education schools and established the Nevada Union Humanities Academy, Ninth Grade Opportunity Program, and Fast Track. Freshman Accelerated Skills Training on the existing traditional high school campuses. It also approved formation and establishment of Wolf Creek High School, a Home Based Alternative School using Independent Study. The foregoing programs are to become effective with the 1999-2000 school year. CONCLUSIONS

R11-12: in conjunction with 7 Students required to wear manufacturing businesses. Additional grant and state . . uniforms. funds that exceed the ADA Independent Study Program . School day is 6 hours (as of on site for 200 additional monies. Jan.1999) with breakfast and students; 74 graduated in Pioneer lunch provided. 1998. No transportation provided. Located at Bear River High • School for grades 11-12. Earle Jamieson 36 students, 1 full-time . teacher and 3 part-time Located at 10657 E. Bennett teachers, graduated 6 in June St., Grass Valley, for grades 1998. 9-12. Directed studies: (students 44 students, 2 full-time . • work alone and collect teachers and 2 instructional credits in subjects they aides. need). Life Skills classes for Directed Studies: Students • all. work alone and collect 3 classroom hours per day, credits in subjects they need. . morning or afternoon, and Computer program and Work Experience or weightlifting is offered. No Regional Occupational homework assigned. Program to supplement. School day ends at 1:15 p.m. No vocational program or Nevada Union Tech after-school activities are offered. Located at Nevada Union 40 percent absentee rate. High School for grades 11- 12. Juvenile Hall 30 students, 2 full-time • teachers and 27 graduated in Located at 15076 State • 45

Nevada Irrigation District Financial Report Reason for the Investigation*

27 pages 10 findings 12 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 10 findings

F1: NID is a public water agency operated for users within its 287,000 acre boundaries in Nevada and Placer County. NID was formed by public vote in 1921. The district is the second largest irrigation district in California. The agency places emphasis on uninterrupted service to its customers. The district maintains ten reservoirs and eight water treatment plants.

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Grand Jury recommends NID develop a standard formula based on estimated future delivery costs that will be used for determining future user rate adjustments. Further, the Grand Jury recommends that factors used in producing user rates be published each year.

F2: The district was organized primarily for the purpose of supplying water for irrigation. Currently, the district also supplies water for domestic and industrial users, electric power and recreational facilities. In numbers of customers, NID has been growing by about 6 percent a year. The majority of this growth is service to users of domestic water.

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The Grand Jury recommends that the NID Board of Directors hire the expertise to accurately project their capital requirements and establish an effective long range planning process.

F3: There are approximately 160 full and part time employees. ني ا A five-member board of directors governs the district. District voters elect each director for

Related Recommendations (1)

R3: The Grand Jury recommends NID develop a process to improve their communications with the community.

F4: A study of NID rates over the past 10 years reveals the following: PERCENT RATE IN RATE IN ANNUAL % INCREASE INCREASE 1989 1998 $5,750.00 Connection Fee $3,040.00 89.1 8.9 BI-Monthly Charges Domestic ¾" Inside district 22.60 31.25 38.3 3.8 301.00 29.7 3.0 Irrigation/Miners Inch 232.00 Rates were raised every year from a low of one percent to a high of 14 percent. The overall increase in rates over 10 years is shown above. During our interviews of NID personnel, the Grand Jury was unable to determine any formal rate setting process. NID management stated that rate increases were generally determined by increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). However, an analysis of rate increases over the past 10 years revealed the rate increases showed little relationship with CPI.

Related Recommendations (1)

R4: our customers have a 5/8" meter) are correct. The irrigation/miners inch rate shown for 1 miners inch is correct but this is not representative of the District's rate schedule. The rate lowest per miners inch rate in 1989 was $88 and for 1998 was $113.30. Attached is a summary of the changes for water rate, CPI and connection fees. This shows that on some years, there is correlation between the water rate increases and CPI changes.

F5: NID derives income from sale of water, electric power, recreational user fees, tax revenues and interest on district financial investments. The property tax revenue rate is set by state law, and is a part of property taxes levied on property within the district boundaries. The voters passed State Proposition 13 in June 1978. Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 95, et seq., the district is allocated a percentage of County property tax revenues. Property tax allocation to the district totaled $4.9 Million in 1998.

Related Recommendations (1)

R5: Agree/Partially Agree The District has attempted to respond under the Recommendation Section to the comments concerning system improvements, projects scheduled and unscheduled maintenance in a positive manner agreeing that there are projects not fully completed in each anticipated year. There are numerous reasons such as; higher priority needs; weather (restricting full completion); delays yet allowing the project to be used until full completion; from time to time the need to have as built drawings finished in order to close out the work order. Whatever the delay there is the goal to finalize all paper work as quickly as possible and accurately. There is no question that projects have been postponed for periods of time and it is again based upon availability of personnel to professionally design and monitor the project. Some projects are developer originated and the District responds to the time frames that are provided by the developer. See item 5

F6: The State Health Department has inspection and approval responsibility for work performed on NID's domestic water treatment facilities and delivery systems. Engineering inspections and approval for work on irrigation water systems is the responsibility of NID. Buildings and construction work on non-water systems for NID's use is subject to county building codes and inspections.

Related Recommendations (1)

R6: Partially Agree with addition of City building codes as required for projects located in City limits.

F7: The historical financial information from NID showed that NID has averaged an annual rate increase of 3.8 percent for treated water users and 3 percent for irrigated water users.

Related Recommendations (1)

R7: Other Educational Activities The District offers school and public tours of its office, water treatment plants and hydroelectric power plants, provides print materials to the schools and works on watershed planning with high school students. The District is a sponsor of the Nevada County Imaginarium. NID also produces and bottles tasty drinking water fresh from the Sierra Nevada.

F8: The district makes water sales outside the district. However, these are subject to year to year contracts and are subject to either reduction or termination if water is not available for district users. NID forecasts water needs in the district by the use of the county's master plan, county building permit history, NID history, building proposals by developers and any other sources available to management.

Related Recommendations (1)

R8: was used are questions NID cannot answer. The writer of this FINDING uses the word assumptions and therefore chart 2 cannot be verified. The District does apologize for the inadvertent noncompliance in its first submittal of response to the Grand Jury report. Sincerely, A Sand Make R. Paul Williams President JPC/sm Attachment: Summary of Rate Fees Changes Original submittal 9-16-99 . ... Summary of Rate & Fees Changes Raw Water CPI 5/8 Conn. Treated Water Connect. Year 1st MI Addl MI Ave Fees $ BI-Mo. Usage Ave August Fees 6.00% 4.00% 4.92% 4.70% 2.59% $ 1,980 1989 2.50% 5.30% 3.85% 1988=$1,930 1.00% 2.02% $ 3.00% 1.97% 1.00% 1.00% 5.60% 2,020 1.00% 1990 4.95% $ 2,120 1.00% 4.03% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 3.80% 7.00% 1991 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 2.36% $ 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 3.80% 2,170 1992 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% 2.76% $ 2,230 1993 3.10% 2.50% 2.50% 4.04% $ 2,320 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.80% 1994 3.00% 3.00% 3 00% 3.00% 16.81% $ 2,710 3.00% 3.00% 2.89% Yr 1of3 of 37% increase 1995 3.00% 3.20% 5.00% 3.00% 4.18% 2.60% 13.28% $ 3,070 1996 3/4/5% Yr 1of2 of storage comp. Incr 1997 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.90% 14.01% $ 3,500 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.20% 3.71% $ 1998 2.00% 3,630 3.02% 3.12% Ave 10 yrs 3.44% 8.3% 10/12/99 WTRATE History xis è 1 . ŧ 1 1 1 ŧ 1 , k į 1 $ ì 1 ś ノレ M:\Chatigny Folder\Grand Jury Response 8-23-99 doc evada Irrigation Dis 1036 W Main St + PO Box 1019 + Grass Valley, CA 95945-1019 + (530) 273-6185 From Auburn & Lincoln: 1-800-222-4102 FAX: (530) 477-2646 The District pledges to provide its customers with a safe dependable water supply for urban and agricultural uses at the lowest feasible cost utilizing available resources today and in the future. IN REPLYING REFER TO FILE NO September 16, 1999 County of Nevada Civil Grand Jury 950 Maidu Avenue Nevada City, CA 95959 Attention: Foreperson The following is the District's response to the 1998-99 Grand Jury report recommendations. Comment 1 The Grand Jury recommends NID develop a standard formula based on estimated future delivery costs that will be used for determining future user rate adjustments. Further, the Grand Jury recommends that factors used in producing user rates be published each year. Response The District's Water Rate committee had directed staff at its May 26, 1999, meeting to prepare a request for proposal to solicit assistance in performing a cost of service study of user fees. Once this study is completed, the District will review the findings and consider adoption of the results. The anticipated completion date of the study is February 2000. At the conclusion of the study a determination will be made as to how customers will be informed in regards to annual changes in rates and fees for services provided by the District. Comment 2 The Grand Jury recommends that the NID Board of Directors hire the expertise to accurately project their capital requirements and establish an effective long range planning process. Directors: Nancy Weber, Div. 1 • Ernst L. Bierwagen, Div. 2 • Dale H. Birdsall, Div. 3 • R. Paul Williams, Div. 4 • George Leipzig, Div. General Manager: James P. Chatigny • Secretary: S Carol Gates • Treasurer: Teresita T Andrews Attorneys: Minasian, Spruance, Baber, Meith, Soares & Sexton, LLP 287 000 ACRES SITUATED IN NEVADA PLACER, SIERRA & YUBA COUNTIES September 16, 1999 County of Nevada, Civil Grand Jury Response In past years, the District has not published an annual "Capital Improvement List". As of a few years ago, the District relied on its budgeting process to set project priorities on a year by year basis. The budget project list was a compilation of separate project lists by the Maintenance, Operations and Engineering departments. For the past two years, District staff has been developing a database containing both maintenance projects and capital improvement projects. This database is referred to as the Project List. The database is a work-in-progress, and is continuously being refined to improve content and usability. Staff members from maintenance, operations, engineering, and administration meet regularly to update the list. All projects placed on the Project List are assigned a primary and secondary funding source using one of 10 categories. Please refer to the enclosed table "Project Funding Categories". A list of projects for the Years 1999 – 2005 is also enclosed. The list includes the project cost estimate and the anticipated primary and secondary funding source. (Five of the ten categories are unused at this time.) The anticipated primary and secondary expenditures for each effected funding category are totaled by year in the following table. 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 COP 0 13,500,000 0 0 0 1,185,000 0 OPR 2,095,850 3,091,300 2,080,000 1,594,500 432,750 253,250 117,500 RMB 65,000 12,500 0 0 12,750 10,750 1,233,000 RSI 7,040,500 34,000 0 230,200 4,877,000 640,000 432,900 4,370,000 TSI 1,136,750 1,844,500 1,536,000 2,019,500 1,870,000 120,000 The enclosed project list and above table demonstrates that the process used to project the need for long-term funding, i.e., reserve funds, is not artificially diminished by funds needed for maintenance projects. Maintenance type projects, where practical and necessary, are generally funded from District Operating Revenues (OPR). The content and priorities found with the Project List will change routinely, from year to year, and within each budget year. The District must remain flexible in its approach to project scheduling in order to accommodate unexpected needs of our customers and to respond to unscheduled maintenance, state or federal mandates, natural disasters, and other unforeseen factors that might effect department work loads. September 16, 1999 County of Nevada, Civil Grand Jury Other tools will be developed in the near future including a document retrieval system, leading to automation of all District maps, and a facilities management program that makes use of the automated maps. These tools will assist staff in forecasting maintenance projects and capital improvements. A consultant may be necessary to coordinate this effort. At this time, given the advancements made thus far on the Project List, it does not seem necessary to out-source the task of projecting capital requirements or to establish a long range planning process. District staff is making satisfactory progress on both fronts. ł Comment 3 The Grand Jury recommends NID develop a process to improve their communications with the community. Response The District has developed a very indepth program to provide information to customers and other interested groups. Here is an overview of the District's public information efforts:

F9: Construction work on water systems funded by NID do not require competitive bidding. However, NID Board of Directors have mandated that competitive bidding will be used on all such projects. Construction work that is funded by the State and Federal governments require competitive bids and use of prevailing wage rates.

Related Recommendations (1)

R9: Agree Directors: Nancy Weber, Div 1 + Ernst L Bierwagen, Div 2 + Peter Arnold, Div 3 + R Paul Williams, Div 4 + George Leibzig, Div 5 General Manager: James P Chatigny • Secretary: S Carol Gates • Treasurer: Teresita T Andrews Attorneys: Minasian, Spruance, Baber, Meith, Soares & Sexton, LLP 287,000 ACRES SITUATED IN NEVADA, PLACER, SIERRA & YUBA COUNTIES

F10: NID has reserved funds for unknown contingencies, such as Federal energy de-regulation, re- licensing power plants and a contract re-negotiation with PG&E due in 2013. FINANCIAL

Related Recommendations (1)

R10: Agree Partially (There is no fund available in reserve to negotiate with PG&E. The reserve funds are to assist in procuring a license renewal with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.) FINANCIAL