Shasta County Grand Jury
2010-2011
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Findings & Recommendations
4 findings
F1:
Has sufficient funds to maintain operations.
F2:
Does not consider depreciation, equipment costs and future upgrades when pool expenses are budgeted.
F3:
Did not transfer funds from water or sewer accounts into the pool fund for the period covered by the Grand Jury’s investigation.
F4:
Did not violate Proposition 218 because voters approved all fees and increases in fees for the community pool.
Additional Recommendations
3
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
The district needs to eliminate its operating losses and be able to handle unanticipated future expenses.
R2:
The district should continue to designate funds for system upgrades and replacement, as cash flows permit. It should carefully monitor operations to bring the district into a break-even position.
R3:
The district should continue to look at all sources to increase the revenue stream.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
4 findings
F1:
Impaired driving and impaired related crashes are a threat to the safety and well being of
F2:
Sobriety checkpoints should be integrated with DUI saturation patrols, public information
F3:
Prosecutorial support is needed for the DUI enforcement program to be successful
F4:
Sobriety checkpoints when integrated with an aggressive enforcement program and
Additional Recommendations
2
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Redding continue to fund the Sobriety
R2:
That the Redding Police Department continue the use of specialized DUI patrols that can
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
3 findings
F1:
The Mountain Gate board was advised by its legal counsel that there was no
F2:
Prior to the board implementing a policy on credit card usage, charges to the
F3:
After receiving training, board meetings attended by the Grand Jury were orderly.
Additional Recommendations
3
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
The board create a policies and procedures manual separate from the bylaws for all
R2:
All board members complete training on the Brown Act and government ethics every
R3:
The policies and procedures manual should designate the maximum reimbursement rates
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Findings & Recommendations
1 findings
F1:
The Grand Jury has determined that the Coroner's office is in dire need of new
Additional Recommendations
1
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
The Grand Jury recommends Shasta County allocate resources in next year’s
Findings & Recommendations
1 findings
F1:
Inmates are not provided with adequate protection from the cold during the inmate housing unit searches that occur in winter.
Additional Recommendations
2
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
Inmates are relocated to other areas of the jail during pod searches.
R2:
If required to be relocated outside, inmates be provided with adequate means for warmth.
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.