📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Shasta County Grand Jury
• 2010-2011
Burney Water District: Financial Solvency of Local Swimming Pool
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
Page 49
Has sufficient funds to maintain operations.
F2
Page 49
Does not consider depreciation, equipment costs and future upgrades when pool expenses are budgeted.
F3
Page 49
Did not transfer funds from water or sewer accounts into the pool fund for the period covered by the Grand Jury’s investigation.
F4
Page 49
Did not violate Proposition 218 because voters approved all fees and increases in fees for the community pool.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 49The district needs to eliminate its operating losses and be able to handle unanticipated future expenses.
-
R2Page 49The district should continue to designate funds for system upgrades and replacement, as cash flows permit. It should carefully monitor operations to bring the district into a break-even position.
-
R3Page 49The district should continue to look at all sources to increase the revenue stream.