📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2010-2011

Mountain Gate Community Services District Board Decisions

Published: June 23, 2011 8 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 43
The Mountain Gate board was advised by its legal counsel that there was no conflict of interest in the hiring of the General Manager. The Grand Jury, however, determined there was the appearance of favoritism when the board lowered the employment standards and hired the former board member to be general manager.
F2 Page 43
Prior to the board implementing a policy on credit card usage, charges to the district’s credit card were incorrectly reported as fuel expenses when actually they were meals for employees. Although the bylaws allow for a per diem, there is no specific authorization in the bylaws for employees to charge meals on the district’s credit card.
F3 Page 43
After receiving training, board meetings attended by the Grand Jury were orderly.
F4 Page 49
Did not violate Proposition 218 because voters approved all fees and increases in fees for the community pool.

Recommendations 3