📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Calaveras County Grand Jury
• 2019-2020
Continuity – the Grand Jury Report Card
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 15
The 2018-2019 CCGJ inadvertently included language suggesting that certain entities were required to respond to various reports, as opposed to being invited to respond.
F2
Page 15
The most frequent reason for a non-compliant response was the lack of stated timeframe for the completion of further analysis or implementation.
F3
Page 15
Multiple actions taken by the BOS in the 2020 fiscal year were prompted to some degree by Calaveras County Grand Jury Report findings and recommendations.
Recommendations 2
-
R2Page 15The Grand Jury recommends that Governing boards and elected officials who have been asked to respond to Grand Jury reports carefully review California Penal Code §933.05 to ensure that timeframes are provided when recommendations require further analysis or will be implemented at a future date. Responses: None.
-
R3Page 15None. REFERENCE SOURCES · California Penal Code §933.05 · California Grand Jurors’ Association website, www.cgja.org Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code §929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.