Orange County Grand Jury • 2008-2009 • Agency Response
Response to: "Paper Water" - Does Orange County Have A Reliable Future? 06/19/09 4.13MB

Jug's The City of Tustin (City) G:in receipt of the Orange County Grand letter dated June i~zoog-*

Published: September 01, 2009 6 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 4 findings

F1
There is inadequate coordination between local land use planning agencies and local water supply agencies, resulting in a process that fails to fully engage the issues. Response: The City of Tustin disagrees with the finding and believes that adequate coordination currently occurs between Tustin's local land-use planning agency and local water supply agencies. The City believes that the existing, coordinated process supports a full review of the issues related to a proposed development project's impact upon the water supply or service. Two water agencies currently serve Tustin; City coordination with both agencies is essential because of their specific water expertise. Both of Tustin's water supply agencies are knowledgeable of a proposed Mayor Doug Davert • Mayor Pro Tem Jerry Amante • Jim Palmer • Deborah Gavello • John Nielsen 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • (714) 573-3010 • www.tustinca.org The Honorable Kim Dunning, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court September 1, 2009 development project's water resource needs, the regional utility service demand, and both are regularly apprised of any larger, state-wide water supply concerns. Given their significant level of expertise and access to current information, the City's water supply agencies are best equipped to provide input to the City regarding a proposed development project's potential impact (if any) upon the available water supply or service. F.i (a): Water agencies have tended to avoid interfering with or participating in growth- management decisions. Response: The City of Tustin disagrees with the finding and is unaware of any water agency acting in this manner.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Each Orange County municipal planning agency, in cooperation with its respective water supply agency, should prepare for adoption by its city council, a dedicated Water Element to its General Plan in conjunction with a future update, not to exceed June 30, 2010. This document should include detailed implementation measures based on objective-based policies that match realistic projections of the County's future water supplies. These objectives, policies and implementation measures should address imported supply constraints, including catastrophic The Honorable Kim Dunning, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court September 1, 2009 outages and incorporate the realistic availability and timing of "new" water sources such as desalination, contaminated groundwater reclamation, and surface water recycling. Response: This recommendation will not be implemented because the City of Tustin already prepares an Urban Water Management Plan every five years. Also, MWD prepares an Urban Water Management Plan, an Integrated Resources Plan and a Water Supply Outlook. In addition, the City's adopted General Plan currently includes a Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Element that notes the constraints associated with essential natural resources (including water) and sets forth goals and policies that further the protection and maintenance of these natural resources. The City's Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Element encourages many water conservation goals and measures including protection of domestic groundwater supply, conservation, expansion of reclaimed water production and use, coordination of water quality and supply programs with responsible water agencies, and cooperation and participation in water quality and supply plan preparation and programs. Collectively, these documents already provide the information suggested in the Grand Jury's report. The proposed Water Element is not mandated by state law to be included in a City's General Plan. Current state law grants cities the discretion to choose which additional optional elements should be included in a General Plan. The Grand Jury does not have the authority to supersede state law and mandate that cities adopt an additional General Plan element. In addition, if state law were to be adopted mandating cities to adopt a Water Element as part of the General Plan, adoption by June 30, 2010 would be unrealistic. Existing state law prohibits a City from amending its General Plan more than four times a year. Past General Plan amendments would preclude many cities from meeting the proposed deadline.
F2
the public in comparison to the numerous other environmental issues presented during development project reviews. Response: The City partially agrees with the finding. The City and the Orange County water industry have many communication and outreach avenues which are effective in informing the public. For example, the City and the water industry have collectively advertised itself as the "Family of Southern California Water Agencies," and promoted "Bewaterwise.com" to get the word out on the current water supply situation, along with water conservation tips and opportunities. In addition, the City utilizes bill inserts, newsletters and websites to inform customers about important water issues. The City also participates in meetings of a Public Affairs Workgroup sponsored by the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) to develop message points for use by retail water agencies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Each Orange County retail and wholesale water agency should affirm its responsibility to develop new, additional, innovative public outreach programs beyond water conservation and rationing programs, to expose the larger issues surrounding water supply constraints facing Orange County. The objective should be to connect the public with the problem. The outreach effort should entail a water emergency exercise that simulates a complete, sudden break in imported water deliveries. The exercise should be aimed directly at the public and enlist widespread public participation on a recurring basis beginning by June 30, 2010. This recommendation may be satisfied by a multi-agency exercise but the inability to coordinate such an event should not preclude the individual agency's responsibility. Response: The recommendation has already been implemented by the City which addresses both public outreach and emergency planning. From a public outreach standpoint, the City and water industry communications systems already in place provide sufficient opportunities for the public to be informed about key water conservation and supply issues. In terms of emergency planning, the scenario involving a complete sudden break in imported water deliveries was a component of the Golden Guardian exercise sponsored in 2008 by the State. The Water Emergency Response Organization of Orange County (WEROC) was an active participant in this important statewide emergency test exercise. The Honorable Kim Dunning, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court September 1, 2009 Each MWDOC member agency should reaffirm to LAFCO that it will assign the resources
F3
structure to promote efficient delivery of services. To this end, LAFCO is conducting a governance study of MWDOC which is the designated representative for nearly all the Orange County retail water agencies, acting on their behalf with their surface water supplier Metropolitan.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
necessary to expediently resolve regional governance issues. While the subject study is being facilitated by LAFCO, the options are with the agencies to decide what is best for all. Once conclusions are reached, the parties need to agree quickly and, hopefully, unanimously to adopt a course of action. Response: The recommendation has already been implemented by the City. The City has actively participated in the stakeholder meetings facilitated by LAFCO for the MWDOC Governance Study. The City will continue to monitor and provide input as appropriate as LAFCO's study process continues forward. Each Orange County retail and wholesale water agency should affirm its commitment to a
F4
Orange County is uniquely fortunate to have a vast, high quality, well-managed groundwater basin serving its north geographical area. However, in its south reaches, it has an equally large, high-growth area with virtually no available groundwater resources. Response: The City agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
fair-share financial responsibility in completing the emergency water supply network for the entire County. The entire County should be prepared together for any conditions of drought, natural or human caused disaster, or any other catastrophic disruption. WEROC should commence meetings of all parties, to facilitate consensus on an equitable funding/financing agreement. Response: The recommendation has already been implemented by the City. WEROC was established to conduct emergency planning and preparedness at the regional level, and respond to disaster type events that could impact the City as well as other water and wastewater agencies within Orange County. WEROC participates with regional and statewide emergency planning forums as well. The City also has an emergency plan and periodically conducts activities to be in a state of emergency preparedness. In addition, the City maintains emergency interties with neighboring water agencies to allow water to be moved back and forth as needed during emergency situations. The City trusts that the submittal of this response letter demonstrates our intent to work in full cooperation with the Orange County Grand Jury. Please call Fred Adjarian, Water Services Manager, at (714) 573-3381 should you have questions, or require additional information. Sincerely, Doug Daxf∉rt Mayor c: Honorable City Council William A. Huston, City Manager Douglas Holland, City Attorney Douglas S. Stack, Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer Elizabeth Binsack, Director of Community Development

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.