Ventura County Grand Jury
• 2003-2004
• Agency Response
Response to:
Ventura County Proposition 36 Implementation
Grand Jury Report*
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F19
Page 1
The Ventura County District Attorney's Office, along with CFS, county law enforcement agencies and the Ventura County Health Care Agency have developed Safe Harbor to help child victims of sexual and physical abuse and severe neglect; and
No recommendations for this finding
F20
Page 1
The location of the Safe Harbor site in Ventura is in jeopardy due to high cost of the rental space and current countywide budget problems; I concur with both findings and commend the Grand Jury for acknowledging the value of the Safe Harbor program in helping child victims of abuse and neglect and their nonoffending family members access vital criminal justice, medical and counseling services. I must also state my Hall of Justice, 800 South Victoria Ave., Ventura, CA 93009 www.ventura.org./vcda/ (805) 654-2500 Fax (805) 654-3850 🚷 The Honorable Bruce A. Clark June 10, 2004 Page Two strong support and concurrence with the Grand Jury's recognition that the Safe Harbor program faces financial jeopardy due to its high rent cost for its Ventura facility and local budget cuts. Response to Recommendation: In reference to the Grand Jury Report's recommendation:
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.