📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Nevada County Grand Jury
• 2010-2011
The Nevada County Grand Jury reviewed the activities and responsibilities of the Public
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 7 findings
F1
fulfilled. Given the limited staffing of the office of the Public Administrator and the complexities
F2
of administering some estates, the Public Administrator may take a long time to complete the administration of an estate.
F3
CWS/CMS when an individual visits the CPS facility to file a report of abuse or neglect. CPS failed to document, by entry into CWS/CMS, this complainant's initial report of
F4
suspected child abuse. Child Protective Services of Nevada County
F5
Since the report was not entered into CWS/CMS, CPS took no action to investigate the allegations until the Jury encouraged the complainant to contact CPS management.
F6
The actions of CPS personnel, relative to the complainant's initial report, were not in accordance with CPS policies requiring that all reports of suspected child abuse be entered into CWS/CMS.
F7
Children remain at risk if CPS fails to reliably record and investigate reports of suspected child abuse or neglect.
Recommendations 10
-
R1valid will. Responses None required. Deputy Public Administrator ( \cdot ) 6 ŀ: ľ, ( . ( Ų, ť, ij, Ų. Ę, - ( ( 0 ( ( 0 0 0 COUNTY GOVERNMENT 0 0 0 ( November 2010 General Election in Nevada County C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 Nevada County Grand Jury Report with Responses 2010-2011 - November 2010 General Election in Nevada County
-
R2inhibits voters from resolving last minute questions concerning spoiled or lost ballots. Recommendations The Nevada County Clerk Recorder should direct staff to include the following with the
-
R3Vote-by-Mail signatures are verified by computer.
-
R4Instructions for Vote-by-Mail voters:
-
R5Do not address all circumstances for return of spoiled or lost ballots. Lack instructions for replacement of spoiled Vote-by-Mail or lost ballots when it is • too late to use the U.S. Postal Service. Are not clear if the Vote-by-Mail voter chooses to vote in person. Do not identify the address of the polling place, if applicable. . Do not include the phone number for the Elections Office on the Vote-by-Mail . envelope. In following up on the 2008-2009 Nevada County Grand Jury Report the current Jury
-
R6found the following: Compensation is provided for all poll workers attending training. . There were no polling places in locations serving alcohol. Eight precincts were staffed by organized community groups. Findings Instructions accompanying Vote-by-Mail ballots created confusion for some voters.
-
R70 were not returned. As a result, the Jury encouraged the complainant to contact CPS 0 management. During this investigation the Jury observed that CPS had no log, recording or other
-
R8process to determine whether an individual visited the CPS office. There is no procedure at the CPS facility for management to reconcile the total number
-
R9of reported cases with the number of cases entered into CWS/CMS. CPS management provided the Jury with certain CPS policies and procedures and 10. other administrative documents (see
-
R11investigation, there was no CPS procedure to verify that telephone calls, or voice mails, had been responded to per CPS policy. O Findings The Jury concludes that the visit to CPS took place and the complainant reported