⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
The MCGJ’s examination of the County accounts and reports failed to disclose any malfeasance or negligence by the County of Madera.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The MCGJ recommends that the County of Madera continue to use appropriate accounting practices and policies consistent with national accounting standards for all County Service Areas managed by the County.
F2
The MCGJ found a lack of good communication between County of Madera and the residents of Rolling Hills, which resulted in misunderstanding and frustration on both sides.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The MCGJ recommends the County of Madera communicate in writing or meeting in person with County Service Areas and Special Districts to provide the financial health of those entities to them on an annual basis. REQUIRED RESPONSES Pursuant to Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, the grand jury requests responses as follows: From the following elected and appointed county officials : Supervisor District 1 County of Madera 200 W. 4th St., Madera, CA 93637 Chief Administrative Officer, County of Madera 200 W. 4th St., Madera, CA93637 Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.