Madera County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

2018-2019-06 City Of Chowchilla Public Works Department:Interrupted Flow*

Published: July 24, 2019 19 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings 12 findings

F1
The MCGJ finds there are no established and consistent testing, security, or maintenance procedures in place. Response: The City and Director disagree, in part, with Finding 1. While it is true that there was no established and consistent procedures in place prior to 2017, procedures were fully established by April 2017 and are referenced in the MCGJ Report on line 126, line 191, and line 217 (Recommendation 9, which includes the date of the Policies and Procedures Manual).
F2
The MCGJ reports the chlorine residual tests results filed with the state of California Water Resource Board were at a level of 0.3 ppm every day, for four years. Response: The City and Director agree with the finding that the chlorine test results were at a level of 0.3 ppm every day, for four years between 2013 and 2017. This was due to staff using a chlorine residual kit that used a reagent that changed the color of the water sample, which then required visual interpretation to the number that correlated closely with the color identified. Since 2017, the Director has instituted new policies, procedures and equipment to rectify this issue. Since 2017 the chlorine levels are checked with an electronic chlorine colorimeter that provides more detailed and accurate residual numbers.
F3
The MCGJ observed chlorine residual testing kits are not readily available in each vehicle for daily testing. Response: The City and Director agree with the finding. City has taken steps to ensure the testing kit availability to the individual employee responsible for testing and has met regulatory requirements.
F4
The MCGJ found the chlorine residual testing sample site #14 was leaking, dirty, and not secured. Response: The City and Director disagree, in part, with Finding 4. The sample site was not leaking and dirty. City is satisfied that the site location does not necessitate additional security.
F5
The MCGJ observed during the chlorine testing procedure, the outcome was forced to produce the consistent 0.3 ppm test result. Response: The City and Director disagree with the finding. The MCGJ did not understand the testing procedure and requested that another staff member perform the procedure. Staff obliged the MCGJ and the test was conducted consistent with city policies and produced an accurate result.
F6
The MCGJ observed the equipment door was open, not locked or secured at well site #14. Response: The City and Director disagree with the finding as the door is normally closed and locked but was opened for the MCGJ requested tour of the well site.
F7
The MCGJ observed sample test site #14 was not secured despite a designated mesh ring feature to accommodate a lock. Response: The City and Director agree with the finding, however, there is no state or federal requirement that the sample test site is to be locked. The regulations specify minimum sampling frequencies, sampling locations, testing procedures, methods of keeping records, and frequency of reporting to the state. City secures locations based on need.
F8
The MCGJ found from 2013-2017, the valve exercise program was not completed on a regular basis. Response: The City and Director agree with the finding. Between 2013 and 2017, the valve exercise program was not completed on a regular basis. Once staffing levels increased after 2017, the valve exercising program has been completed on a regular basis.
F9
The MCGJ found the supporting documentation used to populate the state of California Water Resource Board report was incomplete and inaccurate including omissions of the year, number of valve rotations, and the operator's identification. Response: The City and Director disagree with the finding. The report met the regulator requirements. Years were not omitted and valve rotations and operator identification are not a component of the annual report, only the amount of valves exercised.
F10
The MCGJ found the flush line bracket leading to the catch basin at Well Site #14 was damaged, thus eliminating the existence of an air gap deemed necessary to prevent water supply system contamination. Response: The City and Director disagree with the finding. The flush line bracket leading to the catch basin at Well Site No. 14 was not damaged. The MCGJ noticed a drain line bracket to the well's water lube line was broken, which does not require an air gap.
F11
The MCGJ found no labeling of water supply or drain lines to equipment at Well Site #14. Response: The City and Director agree with the finding. However, it is not a State mandated requirement.
F12
The City of Chowchilla's Personnel Rules and Regulations as well as the Public Works Policy and Procedure Manual do not provide direction for employees dealing with water related complaints and entering private dwellings. Response: The City and Director disagree, in part, with the finding. The Public Works Policy and Procedure Manual does provide direction for employees dealing with water related complaints. There is currently no policy for entering private dwellings. The City and Director's Response to the Recommendations:

Recommendations 12

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.