📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Imperial County Grand Jury • 2006-2007

Communications With the Grand Jury

Published: July 14, 2006 151 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 79
Each committee member gives reasons for the investigation. Members can pass, but all should participate. Keep going until ideas run out (about ten minutes). No comments about the validity of correctness of ideas is allowed during this section. The idea is to play off one another’s ideas and get as many reasons as possible in a short period of time.
F2 Page 72
Problems encountered or anticipated.
F3 Page 72
Significant findings.
F4 Page 72
Need for additional assistance.
F5 Page 72
Fieldwork since last report.
F6
Interview and meetings to be held. The purposes served by periodic committee progress reports are four-fold: • They ensure investigations get off to a timely start. • They force the committee to codify its work. • They provide a forum for the remaining jurors to review the committee’s work or suggest avenues of investigation the committee may have overlooked. • They minimize the chance for duplication of effort between committees. • Except in special circumstances, these reports should take no more than five minutes (i.e., about an hour and a half per meeting for all committee reports). • In the event that progress is being made in a timely manner and no significant items have been uncovered by the committee since the last report, these reports can be made on a “by exception” basis (i.e., “only the following exceptions to the last report”). Oral Final Reports Because of the nature of the oral reports in the Grand Jury cycle, it should be expected that there will be areas of the investigation that are not yet complete and require further work. Additionally (and a unique aspect of oral reports) is the need to address the underlying documentation for each of the committee’s findings. Nothing can so easily undermine the work of the whole Grand Jury as a February 2006 59 IMPERIAL COUNTY GRAND JURY PROCEDURES MANUAL report in which undocumented and incorrect findings are presented. Grand Jury members should be punctilious about questioning the basis for each finding laid before the jury. During presentation of oral reports, members of the Grand Jury should refrain from making comments about the committee’s report until after delivery of the report is complete. At that time, questions should be elicited from each member of the jury concerning completeness and accuracy of the report. In responding to these questions, the committee chairperson should take the opportunity to call upon the other committee members (depending on their area of expertise) to answer the question. HELPFUL HINT TO FOREPERSON During this and other Grand Jury sessions, ensure that discussions of committee oral and draft report, or indeed any Grand Jury discussions, remain focused on the subject at hand. Diversions are insidious and basically waste time. Following presentation of the final oral report, there is no need (and indeed a good reason not) to vote on individual findings until they are reduced to writing by the committee. This ensures absolute accuracy as to the actual finding and recommendation accepted by the jury. Written Draft Reports When the oral reports are deemed satisfactory by the Grand Jury, the committee should be directed to complete the remaining areas of its investigation and proceed with preparing a draft final written report. However, in completing the investigation, the committee must remain sensitive to the need for keeping the whole Grand Jury informed of any unique or significant developments, especially as they relate to findings and recommendations. Once the committee’s investigation is substantially complete (usually in late January or early February, in order to meet a June 30th final report publication date), the committee should make a written draft report for Grand Jury review and comment at the next Grand Jury meeting. This report should take the form of the Final Report, i.e.:

Recommendations 11