Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2018-2019
• Agency Response
Response to:
Measure B - Where Are We?
Who Runs Mendocino County?
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6, F7
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F2
There is no written succession plan for the CEO of Mendocino County. Disagree partially. While there may not be a document titled “CEO succession plan” the Board of Supervisors has directed that succession planning take place at all levels of county government. The Mendocino County Leadership Initiative which seeks to identify current and future leaders and foster development of their leadership skills is at the core of Mendocino County succession planning. Additionally, the CEO has a succession plan that includes grooming 2-3 department heads and other key staff to assume leadership roles. These county leaders will be ready to apply for the position of CEO when the County Executive decides to leave Mendocino County employment. Along with prepared internal candidates, the Board of Supervisors will always have the option to do a comprehensive recruitment in search of the right person for the job. While the model of grooming an Assistant CEO to replace the existing CEO is very common in city and county government, it is not the only option and may not always be the best. It is presumptuous to think the CEO’s choice for Assistant CEO is the succession plan when there may be other options that the Board of Supervisors wishes to pursue. Appointment of the CEO is a key responsibility of the Board of Supervisors and it will always be a Board decision to decide on the appointment of an internal candidate or to do a comprehensive recruitment.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Develop a succession plan for the CEO position. This recommendation has been implemented. The CEO has a succession plan. Please refer to the CEO response to Finding 2.
F3
The BOS does not adequately track directives given to the CEO. The current list of directives has inadequate status and descriptors and there are no timelines or milestones for completion. Disagree Partially. The CEO is responsible for the day-to-day operations of Mendocino County under the direction of the Board of Supervisors. On October 8, 2017, life changed in Mendocino County for many, if not all, of our residents. Within county government, all available resources shifted from day-to-day activities, to fire response and recovery. Today we are still recovering from the 2017 fires, 2018 fires, and preparing for the 2019 PG&E Public Safety Power Shutoff. Fire response, recovery, and preparedness directives have been top priorities resulting in other Board directives being reprioritized and estimated completion times extended. Since October 8, 2017, fire response and recovery has been the top priority for the health and safety of the community. Most other Board Directives are a lesser priority than fire response and recovery and those that require substantial staff time are addressed as resources are available. Additionally, the directive process is at the direction of the Board of Supervisors and can be used to gather information, schedule agenda items, appoint ad hoc committees, direct the development of ordinances or otherwise direct staff to take those actions needed to implement the policy direction of the Board. The Board directive process starts with the Board directing staff during a noticed public meeting. The Clerk of the Board records the directive which is then added to the current Board Directives list. The Executive Office then follows up with the department(s) assigned to the directive. Additional information captured in the directives includes the date of the directive, updates from staff, department(s) assigned, priority level and status. Please refer to the attached current list of Board Directives. When a directive is issued without a timeframe, the Executive Office verifies if the project/directive is feasible, if resources are available, and if legal barriers exist. Following the analysis of the directive, staff determines if the project can move forward. A priority level and timeframe is then developed by the appropriate department based on available resources and the information is reported out to the Board.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Determine whether an Assistant CEO position is necessary. If the position is not going to be filled, it should be unfunded. This recommendation has been implemented. Rather than operating with three Deputy CEOs and an Assistant CEO, the CEO is operating with four Deputy CEOs. The Executive Office structure meets the needs of the county and is compatible with the CEO’s succession plan. The Assistant CEO position was not budgeted in FY 2019-20.
F4
The CEO Report does not include substantive department updates, e.g. new jail addition, Sheriff overtime, BOS directive status, departmental statistics and major road project status. Disagree. The CEO Report does include substantive department updates. The CEO report is released on a monthly basis and includes updates from various departments, including the Cultural Services Agency, Animal Shelter, Human Resources, Health and Human Services Agency and others on an as needed basis. Reports include information on facility projects, the budget, cannabis, important community meetings, Measure B, roads, upcoming meetings, and vacant Board and Commission seats. Additionally, the CEO report is only one means of communicating information to the Board and general public. The Board Agenda contains standing items from departments such as Transportation and Planning and Building Services that include monthly reports on department activities. Certain county offices operating under elected department heads will also periodically report on activities directly to the Board or in coordination with the CEO. Board agendas also include updates and/or action items on substantive issues such as the new jail addition, mental health or homelessness. The Board agendas also include a standing item titled Supervisors’ Reports Regarding Board Special Assignments, Standing and Ad Hoc Committee Meetings, and Other Items of General Interest. Finally, reports and updates on substantive issues are included in the annual Budget Hearings and in quarterly budget reports to the Board of Supervisors.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The Consent Agenda has often included controversial items, e.g. salary increases and cost over runs. Partially Disagree. The criteria for inclusion on the consent calendar is that the item is considered to be routine and non-controversial. The great majority of items meet this criteria. Occasionally during the agenda process, a controversial item is missed and is added to the consent calendar. The controversial item is then pulled from the consent calendar during the Board meeting by a Supervisor for separate consideration. On occasion, a controversial item is pulled by the Department and re-submitted for a later date on the regular agenda.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Directive status should include goal, proposed action, funding status and primary agency. Recommendation requires further analysis and Board direction. The Board directive process and tracking is developed in coordination with the Board of Supervisors. Incorporating the proposed recommendations needs to be considered by the Board of Supervisors prior to implementation.
F8
The GJ could not find a complaint or issue form on the Mendocino County website. Agree. There is currently not an online complaint form on the County website. The County does have hard copy complaint forms available in the Executive Office. Members of the public also submit complaints and issues directly to the Executive Office, Board of Supervisors, and Departments by email and phone.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Consent Agenda should not include controversial items, e.g., salary adjustments or cost Overruns. This recommendation has been implemented. The current procedure only allows known non- controversial items on the consent calendar and there are measures in place should a controversial item be overlooked in the agenda setting process. Please refer to the CEO’s response to Finding 5.