Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
A Question of Ethics Are local agencies complying with new ethics law? Synopsis
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 13 findings
F1
The Grand Jury received verification of compliance of AB 1234 from these agencies: • Santa Cruz County: Davenport Sanitation District, Freedom Sanitation District, Graham Hill Rd. County Service Area, Pajaro Storm Drain Maintenance District, County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, County Sanitation District, Solid Waste Disposal District, County Service Area Manager • Cities: Santa Cruz, Scott Valley, Capitola, Watsonville • Water Districts: Scotts Valley, Soquel Creek, San Lorenzo Valley, Pajaro Valley • Fire Protection Districts: Central, Pajaro Valley, Zayante, Aptos/La Selva, Ben Lomond, Scotts Valley, Boulder Creek, Felton • Salsipuedes Sanitary District • Pajaro Valley Cemetery District
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The County Administrative Office reported to the County Board of Supervisors outlining requirements of AB 1234, who then directed all county department heads to comply.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
All county employees are subject to the provisions of Government Code Section 1126, et seq., Santa Cruz County Code Section 3.40 and Section 173 of the County Personnel Rules and Regulations regarding incompatible activities.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The County Board of Supervisors directed the Personnel Department to maintain records of training completed by officials.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Special district agencies learned of ethics training requirements from counsel, district associations and financial auditors.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Seven agencies provided their written ethics policies.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Most county officials opted to take the ethics course online.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
At least four special district agencies had staff who took an online ethics course.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Three agencies staff received training from their independent auditors.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Five identified legal counsel as providing training.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
District Association meetings provided training classes to at least eight agencies.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Two agencies reported the training was helpful and informative.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
One agency commented that state officials would benefit from this training. Conclusion The agencies in Santa Cruz County are complying with AB 1234 by participating in ethics training and developing policies to comply. Commendation The Santa Cruz County Grand Jury thanks all county agencies for responding to our survey and complying with AB 1234. “The government is merely a servant — merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.” — Mark Twain Sources • Responses to Grand Jury questionnaire by 26 county agencies • Web sites: o Institute for Global Ethics http://www.globalethics.org/about/faq.htm o California State Senate http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1201- 1250/ab_1234_bill_20051007_chapterd.html o Office of the Attorney General http://caag.state.ca.us/ethics/ o OnLine AB 1234 Ethics Training http://localethics.fppc.ca.gov/ab1234/ o California Special Districts Association http://www.csda.net/ o Institute for Local Government http://www.ca-ilg.org/trust/ o League of California Cities http://www.cacities.org/resource_files/25287.ELR2007.pdf This page intentionally left blank.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 1
-
CL1 Page 5The agencies in Santa Cruz County are complying with AB 1234 by participating in ethics training and developing policies to comply.
Commendations 2
-
CM1 Page 5Responses to Grand Jury questionnaire by 26 county agencies
-
CM2 Page 5Web sites: o Institute for Global Ethics http://www.globalethics.org/about/faq.htm o California State Senate http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1201- 1250/ab_1234_bill_20051007_chapterd.html o Office of the Attorney General http://caag.state.ca.us/ethics/ o OnLine AB 1234 Ethics Training http://localethics.fppc.ca.gov/ab1234/ o California Special Districts Association http://www.csda.net/ o Institute for Local Government http://www.ca-ilg.org/trust/ o League of California Cities http://www.cacities.org/resource_files/25287.ELR2007.pdf This page intentionally left blank.