Gran Jurado del Condado de Monterey
2015-2016
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
33 hallazgos
F1:
The use of BWCs responds to public demands for greater law enforcement transparency.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
As part of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department’s next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F2:
BWCs, when recording lawful police conduct, provide positive risk management benefits.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2:
As part of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department’s next annual budget allocation (or before) the Carmel-By-The-Sea City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F3:
BWC recordings can serve as a valuable officer training resource.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
The Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F4:
Law enforcement best practices now include law enforcement’s use of BWCs when funds have been made available for their purchase and that of required data storage capacity.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4:
The chief of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department. 27
F5:
At a minimum in California, written department policies must comply with the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18. (Appendix 3)
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
The chief of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F6:
In the absence of other sources of funding, each City Council must make sufficient funds available to its police department before the department can purchase BWCs for its officers and a secure storage system for resulting BWC recordings.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall provide body-worn cameras for each of its officers promptly after they receive the cameras they have ordered.
F7:
In the absence of other sources of funding, the county Board of Supervisors must make sufficient funds available to its Sheriff’s department before the department can purchase BWCs for its deputies and a secure storage system for resulting BWC recordings.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R7:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F8:
The BODYCAM ® BWC described in this report stores recordings on a removable Micro-SD memory card.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R8:
The chief of the Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F9:
The BODYCAM ® BWC described in this report enables any user to delete one or all recorded videos unless those camera functions are disabled by an appropriately trained BODYCAM ® administrator or a manufacturer’s representative.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R9:
The chief of the Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F10:
Because the BODYCAM ® BWC allows the Micro-SD card to be removed from the camera, it is possible for an officer to remove and read the card on an unauthorized computer and to delete or modify recorded data, contrary to the specific prohibitions of Penal Code section 832.18. 25
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R10:
The chief of the Greenfield Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F11:
The Carmel Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers’ use although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R11:
The chief of the Greenfield Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F12:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department is in the process of ordering BWCs for its officers’ use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R12:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18. 28
F13:
The Greenfield Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use in accordance with a written department policy.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R13:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F14:
The Greenfield Police Department’s written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R14:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that each BODYCAM camera’s settings are adjusted by an appropriately trained senior officer to prevent all officers using the BODYCAM® cameras from deleting or in any way altering the BWC video recordings at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system’s secure server.
F15:
The Gonzales Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R15:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that the Department’s written body-worn camera policy specifically prohibits officers using the BODYCAM cameras from removing the flash memory card from the camera at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system’s secure server.
F16:
The Gonzales Police Department’s written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R16:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F17:
The Gonzales Police Department uses the BODYCAM ® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R17:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F18:
The King City Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R18:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that each BODYCAM camera’s settings are adjusted by an appropriately trained senior officer to prevent all officers using the BODYCAM cameras from deleting or in any way altering video recordings at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system’s secure server.
F19:
The King City Police Department’s written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R19:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that the Department’s written body-worn camera policy specifically prohibits officers using the BODYCAM cameras from removing the flash memory 29 card from the camera at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system’s secure server.
F20:
The King City Police Department uses the BODYCAM ® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R20:
As part of the Marina Police Department’s next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Marina City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F21:
The Marina Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers’ use, but the department favors their use and plans to acquire them.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R21:
As part of the Marina Police Department’s next annual budget allocation (or before) the Marina City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F22:
The City of Monterey Police Department is currently in the process of ordering BWCs for its officers’ use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R22:
The Marina Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F23:
The Monterey County Sheriff’s Department does not provide BWCs for its deputies’ use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R23:
The chief of the Marina Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F24:
The Monterey Regional Airport Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use in accordance with an official, but only oral, department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R24:
The chief of the Marina Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F25:
The Monterey Regional Airport Police Department’s BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R25:
The City of Monterey Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F26:
The Pacific Grove Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers’ use. 26
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R26:
The chief of the City of Monterey Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F27:
The Salinas Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R27:
The chief of the City of Monterey Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws 30 relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F28:
The Salinas Police Department’s written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R28:
As part of the Sheriff’s Department’s next annual budget request (or before) the Sheriff’s Department shall apply to the County Board of Supervisors for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F29:
The Sand City Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers’ use, although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R29:
As part of the Sheriff’s next annual budget allocation (or before) the County Board of Supervisors shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Sheriff’s Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department’s choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F30:
The Seaside Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers’ use, although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R30:
The Sheriff’s Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the “best practices” set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F31:
The Soledad Police Department provides BWCs for its officers’ use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R31:
The Sheriff of Monterey County shall meet with the department’s legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F32:
The Soledad Police Department’s draft written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R32:
The Sheriff shall meet with the department’s legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F33:
The Soledad Police Department uses the BODYCAM ® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R33:
The chief of the Airport Police Department shall meet with the department’s legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department’s existing body-worn camera policy, to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the “best practices” of set forth in California Penal Code 832.18, and to convert the policy to written form.
Vista rápida
Detalles completos →
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
31 hallazgos
F1:
The use of BWCs responds to public demands for greater law enforcement transparency.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
As part of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F2:
BWCs, when recording lawful police conduct, provide positive risk management benefits.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2:
As part of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department's next annual budget allocation (or before) the Carmel-By-The-Sea City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F3:
BWC recordings can serve as a valuable officer training resource.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
The Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F4:
Law enforcement best practices now include law enforcement's use of BWCs when funds have been made available for their purchase and that of required data storage capacity.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4:
The chief of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F5:
At a minimum in California, written department policies must comply with the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18. (Appendix 3)
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
The chief of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F6:
In the absence of other sources of funding, each City Council must make sufficient funds available to its police department before the department can purchase BWCs for its officers and a secure storage system for resulting BWC recordings.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall provide body-worn cameras for each of its officers promptly after they receive the cameras they have ordered.
F7:
In the absence of other sources of funding, the county Board of Supervisors must make sufficient funds available to its Sheriff's department before the department can purchase BWCs for its deputies and a secure storage system for resulting BWC recordings. The BODYCAM® BWC described in this report stores recordings on a removable
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R7:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F8:
Micro-SD memory card. The BODYCAM® BWC described in this report enables any user to delete one or
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R8:
The chief of the Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F9:
all recorded videos unless those camera functions are disabled by an appropriately trained BODYCAM ® administrator or a manufacturer's representative.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R9:
The chief of the Del Rey Oaks Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws. The chief of the Greenfield Police Department shall meet with the department's
F10:
Because the BODYCAM ® BWC allows the Micro-SD card to be removed from the camera, it is possible for an officer to remove and read the card on an unauthorized computer and to delete or modify recorded data, contrary to the specific prohibitions of Penal Code section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R10:
legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F11:
The Carmel Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers' use although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R11:
The chief of the Greenfield Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F12:
The Del Rey Oaks Police Department is in the process of ordering BWCs for its officers' use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R12:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F13:
The Greenfield Police Department provides BWCs for its officers' use in accordance with a written department policy.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R13:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F14:
The Greenfield Police Department's written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R14:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that each BODYCAM camera's settings are adjusted by an appropriately trained senior officer to prevent all officers using the BODYCAM® cameras from deleting or in any way altering the BWC video recordings at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server.
F15:
The Gonzales Police Department provides BWCs for its officers' use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R15:
The chief of the Gonzales Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that the Department's written body-worn camera policy specifically prohibits officers using the BODYCAM cameras from removing the flash memory card from the camera at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server.
F16:
The Gonzales Police Department's written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R16:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F17:
The Gonzales Police Department uses the BODYCAM® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R17:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F18:
The King City Police Department provides BWCs for its officers' use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use. The King City Police Department's written BWC policy does not meet all of the
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R18:
The chief of the King City Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that each BODYCAM camera's settings are adjusted by an appropriately trained senior officer to prevent all officers using the BODYCAM cameras from deleting or in any way altering video recordings at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server. The chief of the King City Police Department shall take all steps necessary to
F19:
requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18. The King City Police Department uses the BODYCAM® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R19:
ensure that the Department's written body-worn camera policy specifically prohibits officers using the BODYCAM cameras from removing the flash memory card from the camera at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server.
F20:
F21. The Marina Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers' use, but the department favors their use and plans to acquire them.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R20:
As part of the Marina Police Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Marina City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F22:
The City of Monterey Police Department is currently in the process of ordering BWCs for its officers' use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R22:
The Marina Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
F23:
The Monterey County Sheriff's Department does not provide BWCs for its deputies' use. The Monterey Regional Airport Police Department provides BWCs for its officers'
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R23:
The chief of the Marina Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F24:
use in accordance with an official, but only oral, department policy regarding their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R24:
The chief of the Marina Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F25:
The Monterey Regional Airport Police Department's BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R25:
The City of Monterey Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18. The chief of the City of Monterey Police Department shall meet with the
F26:
The Pacific Grove Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers' use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R26:
department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department. The chief of the City of Monterey Police Department shall meet with the
F27:
The Salinas Police Department provides BWCs for its officers' use in accordance with a written department policy regarding their use. The Salinas Police Department's written BWC policy does not meet all of the
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R27:
department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
F28:
requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R28:
As part of the Sheriff's Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Sheriff's Department shall apply to the County Board of Supervisors for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F29:
The Sand City Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers' use, although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R29:
As part of the Sheriff's next annual budget allocation (or before) the County Board of Supervisors shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Sheriff's Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
F30:
The Seaside Police Department does not provide BWCs for its officers' use, although the department favors their use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R30:
The Sheriff's Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18. The Sheriff of Monterey County shall meet with the department's legal counsel to
F31:
The Soledad Police Department provides BWCs for its officers' use.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R31:
review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
F32:
The Soledad Police Department's draft written BWC policy does not meet all of the requirements of Penal Code Section 832.18. The Soledad Police Department uses the BODYCAM® BWC.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R32:
The Sheriff shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
Recomendaciones adicionales
25
No vinculadas a hallazgos específicos.
R21:
As part of the Marina Police Department's next annual budget allocation (or before) the Marina City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
R33:
The chief of the Airport Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy, to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" of set forth in California Penal Code 832.18, and to convert the policy to written form.
R34:
The chief of the Airport Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R35:
As part of the Pacific Grove Police Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Pacific Grove City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
R36:
As part of the Pacific Grove Police Department's next annual budget allocation (or before) the City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
R37:
The Pacific Grove Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
R38:
The chief of the Pacific Grove Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body-worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
R39:
The chief of the Pacific Grove Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R40:
The chief of the Salinas Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18. The chief of the Salinas Police Department shall meet with the department's legal
R41:
counsel at least annually to review the then current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R42:
As part of the Sand City Police Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Sand City City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
R43:
As part of the Sand City Police Department's next annual budget allocation (or before) the Sand City City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras.
R44:
The Sand City Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy, which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
R45:
The chief of the Sand City Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body- worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
R46:
The chief of the Sand City Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R47:
As part of the Seaside Police Department's next annual budget request (or before) the Department shall apply to the Seaside City Council for funds sufficient to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras. As part of the Seaside Police Department's next annual budget allocation (or
R48:
before) the Seaside City Council shall provide funds sufficient to enable the Police Department to purchase body-worn cameras of the department's choosing for each officer and for a secure data storage system with adequate capacity to store the data recorded by those cameras. The Seaside Police Department shall adopt a written body-worn camera policy,
R49:
which at a minimum includes the "best practices" set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
R50:
The chief of the Seaside Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel to review the legal sufficiency of the department's proposed body- worn camera policy before it is adopted by the department.
R51:
The chief of the Seaside Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state laws relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R52:
The chief of the Soledad Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel as soon as the meeting can be arranged to review the legal sufficiency of the department's existing body-worn camera policy and to revise the policy to include, at a minimum, the "best practices" of set forth in California Penal Code 832.18.
R53:
The chief of the Soledad Police Department shall meet with the department's legal counsel at least annually to review the then-current state law relating to the use of body-worn cameras and the storage of their recordings, and to revise department policy if necessary to comply with such laws.
R54:
The chief of the Soledad Police Department shall take all steps necessary to ensure that each BODYCAM camera's settings are adjusted by an appropriately trained senior officer to prevent all officers using the BODYCAM cameras from deleting or in any way altering video recordings at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server.
R55:
The chief of the Soledad Police Department shall takes all steps necessary to ensure that the Department's written body-worn camera policy specifically prohibits officers using the BODYCAM cameras from removing the flash memory card from the camera at any time before the recordings are downloaded to the system's secure server. The chief of the Soledad police department, the Soledad City Council and the
R56:
Soledad City Manager shall designate as a priority matter the proper completion of the BWC video storage system so that the existing BWCs can be put into daily use by the Soledad police officers on or before August 15, 2016.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
3 hallazgos
F1:
The scope of Academic, Vocational and Re-Entry programs at the California Correction Facility is commendably broad.
F2:
The content of the Academic, Vocational and Re-Entry programs at the California Correction Facility is impressive.
F3:
Program leaders and course instructors appear to be well qualified to provide the necessary leadership and instruction in regard to their respective roles.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
6 hallazgos
F1:
SCRAMP has not been a financially fit concessionaire to the County since 2008.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
The County of Monterey should assign sufficient staff with both managerial and financial expertise to oversee the agreement and fiscal operations of the Laguna Seca Recreational Area. This position should have enough standing to directly advise County decision makers.
F2:
The County did not confront SCRAMP with a direct communication that SCRAMP's late payments and business practices jeopardized its contractual agreement with the County until March 2014.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2:
The County's next concession agreement for the racetrack should be explicit that program proposals are the responsibility of the SCRAMP Board of Governors (or its successors).
F3:
SCRAMP's 2011 and 2014 draft proposals have not adequately addressed the realities of a "boutique" racing venue with significant traffic and sound restrictions in an environmentally sensitive location.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
The County should immediately assure that all environmental surveys of the park are clearly communicated to bidders participating in the RFP process.
F4:
The County has delayed acting on SCRAMP's proposals without clearly communicating in writing how and why these proposals were inadequate i.e.; because 1) SCRAMP did not explain how environmental impacts, such as noise and traffic, would be mitigated and 2) SCRAMP failed to demonstrate that it possessed the necessary financial capabilities to operate the racetrack.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4:
The new concession agreement should clearly define the operator's philanthropic responsibilities to local civic groups.
F5:
SCRAMP's 'philanthropic' contribution to local civic groups might be better described as "assisting civic fund raising on County land." Civic groups and their volunteers are paid for providing services during a racing event, like parking cars or serving ice cream.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
SCRAMP or its successor should be required to notify the County of loans or transfers between operating and capital and any loans that restructure financing for approved capital projects.
F6:
It is essential that SCRAMP or its successor at Laguna Seca demonstrate organizational adaptability.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6:
The County's next concession agreement for the racetrack should oblige a full cost and rate review of all income and non-income producing uses of the facility. This rate review should be undertaken regularly but at least every other year as part of the operator's best practices and should be available for inspection by the County.
Recomendaciones adicionales
1
No vinculadas a hallazgos específicos.
R7:
Monterey County Parks and the Parks Commission should be advised and have input into any plan to expand recreational uses of the Laguna Seca Recreation Area. There may be alternative uses of the Laguna Seca property and these discussions should always be part of concession agreement negotiations. But, if the noise, traffic and environmental constraints truly preclude a successful sports car racing program then Monterey County should initiate some long range planning to reconfigure the recreational uses of the Laguna Seca Recreational Area.
Vista rápida
Detalles completos →
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
8 hallazgos
F1:
Many children enter school with a limited vocabulary and lack of school readiness.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
Provide affordable on-site aftercare for preschool and pre-K classes.
F2:
There are no District preschool programs that provide aftercare.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2:
Increase parent(s) participation and awareness of school meetings, programs and activities by requiring a parent orientation when a new student is registered for school. This orientation should be included in the 2016-17 student registration.
F3:
Grades 2-6 do not have aides who can provide teacher assistance in classroom tasks and small-group work.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
Hire aides to work in grade 2-6 classrooms who can provide teacher assistance with small-group work and other non-credentialed tasks. Hiring of these aides should be accomplished in the 2016-17 school year.
F4:
Students who are not reclassified to Fluent English Proficient status prevents them from taking the high school courses necessary to meet college entrance "a to g" requirements.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4:
Compensate teachers for the additional time spent outside their designated in- structional period to collaborate with parents, and other teachers.
F5:
There is low parent participation in school meetings, programs and activities.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
Make reclassification to Fluent English Proficiency status a priority by the end of 6th grade, and stress the importance of this in teacher in-service trainings beginning in the 2016-17 school year.
F6:
Insufficient time is available for collaboration between District teachers and admini- stration.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6:
Seek and encourage partnerships with community agencies, civic groups, local business and foundations (e.g. First 5 Monterey County, Salinas City Library "paleteros") to sponsor school readiness services and student academic support.
F7:
Inadequate time is allocated to parent/teacher conferences to enable parents to be involved and support their child in school.
F8:
The shortage of credentialed teachers has resulted in the District hiring not-yet- credentialed and substitute teachers to fill the vacant teaching positions.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
7 hallazgos
F1:
Monterey County's Lead Me Home Plan has stalled due to factors including the recession, loss of redevelopment funds, lack of identified leadership and political will.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
Monterey County Board of Supervisors shall appoint a leader to implement the Lead Me Home Plan by June 2017.
F2:
The creation of Housing Pipeline Committee, the first and primary step of the Lead Me Home Plan, did not occur.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R2:
The appointed leader of the Lead Me Home Plan shall reactivate the Housing Pipeline Committee by June 2017.
F3:
Faith-based and non-profit organizations are providing funding and services to house homeless women, but it is insufficient.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
Faith based and non-profits should focus more funds toward housing the homeless. This would reduce the need for other ancillary services, saving money.
F4:
Funding is provided by Monterey County and cities to build low cost housing most of which is unaffordable for homeless women.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R4:
Monterey County and cities within it, shall include more very low cost housing in their action and development plans, beginning with their 2017 plans.
F5:
There are insufficient resources to house the homeless, evidenced by the increasing number of encampments and people living in the street.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
Monterey County and cities within it shall cooperate with non-profits on proposals for alternative temporary shelters for the homeless.
F6:
The cities of Monterey, Salinas and Marina and Monterey County have identified property owned by them that could be used for low cost and transitional housing, but it is currently not being utilized.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R6:
Monterey County and cities within it shall identify which of their owned property could be utilized for very low cost and transitional housing by June 2017.
F7:
Safe overnight parking for homeless women is scarce in Monterey County.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R7:
Monterey County and cities within it shall increase permits for safe overnight parking for homeless women living in their vehicles by June 2017.
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
8 hallazgos
F1:
MRWPCA is responsible for the May 18, 2015, sanitary sewer overflow at Fountain Avenue, Pacific Grove. They own and operate said pump station, and were making repairs there when the overflow occurred.
F2:
MRWPCA did not have a procedure to address potential false pressure readings during valve maintenance on May 18, 2015.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
MRWPCA implement staff training to account for and manage situations of false equipment readings.
F3:
Diverting the SSO into the Monterey Bay prevented a costlier and hazardous uncontrolled overflow. MRWPCA's response in dealing with the May 18 SSO was appropriate given the alternative.
F4:
The condition of PG owned sewer infrastructure was unrelated to the circumstances of the SSO on May18, 2015.
F5:
PG fulfilled its obligation in the Ecological Rights Foundation v. City of Pacific Grove Case #CO3-2612 PVT.
F6:
PG has so far only approved projects outlined in the 2014 SSMP when matching funds are available.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (2)
R2:
The City of Pacific Grove prioritize sewer projects based on severity of pipe degradation and public need.
R4:
The City of Pacific Grove actively seek matching funds for the sewer projects.
F7:
Due to rate increases from Proposition 218, PG will have sufficient funds to resolve the sewer infrastructure issues identified in the 2014 SSMP.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
The City of Pacific Grove annually budget for sewer projects using Proposition 218 funds and other funds as they become available.
F8:
PG is sufficiently maintaining its sanitary sewer system through its contracts with Greenline and Root Tamers.
Vista rápida
Detalles completos →
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
16 hallazgos
F1:
Monterey County is critically dependent on groundwater for both its agricultural and urban water demands.
F2:
Groundwater is critically important to Monterey County's economy.
F3:
Several groundwater basin aquifers in Monterey County are now in overdraft.
F4:
Overdrafting has resulted in seawater intrusion into the 180 and 400 foot aquifers in the northern Salinas Valley Basin.
F5:
Seawater intrusion results in localized salt-contaminated groundwater that is unsuitable for both urban and agricultural uses.
F6:
If no Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) is formed by June 30, 2017 for the Salinas Valley Basin, the County of Monterey could then choose to become the GSA for that basin.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (2)
R2:
That if the June 30, 2017 deadline for forming one or more GSAs for the Salinas Valley Basin is not met by other interested parties, the County of Monterey agree to become the GSA for that basin in order to prevent state intervention in local groundwater planning.
R4:
That the County of Monterey remain mindful of the possibility that it may become the GSA for the Salinas Valley Basin and, with that in mind, take all steps as far in advance of the June 30, 2017 deadline as necessary for it to assume that role prior to that deadline.
F7:
If the County of Monterey chose to become the GSA for the Salinas Valley Basin that choice would prevent the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) from intervening in the local Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) planning process except for overseeing and insuring GSP compliance.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (2)
R2:
That if the June 30, 2017 deadline for forming one or more GSAs for the Salinas Valley Basin is not met by other interested parties, the County of Monterey agree to become the GSA for that basin in order to prevent state intervention in local groundwater planning.
R4:
That the County of Monterey remain mindful of the possibility that it may become the GSA for the Salinas Valley Basin and, with that in mind, take all steps as far in advance of the June 30, 2017 deadline as necessary for it to assume that role prior to that deadline.
F8:
Prior to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), local groundwater management plans lacked sufficient enforcement authority to fully manage groundwater sustainability.
F9:
SGMA confers on GSAs stronger enforcement authority than had existed under previous groundwater management enactments or local plans.
F10:
The non-adjudicated Salinas Valley Marina Area and the Salinas Valley Corral De Tierra Area should be included under the authority of the Salinas Valley Basin GSA and part of the GSA's Groundwater Management Plan (GMP).
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R5:
That the County of Monterey remain mindful of the possibility that it may become the GSA for the Salinas Valley Basin and, with that in mind, begin immediately to consider GSP optional components. REQUIRED AND REQUESTED RESPONSES Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the Civil Grand Jury requires responses from each of the following public entities: Monterey County Water Resources Agency
F11:
Consensus Builders, Inc. has been retained by the City of Salinas, on behalf of itself and others, in an attempt to integrate competing Salinas Valley groundwater interest's in order to arrive at a consensus GSA before June 30, 2017.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R3:
That the County of Monterey actively participate in the currently ongoing effort by Consensus Builders, Inc. to help achieve the formation of one or more GSAs for the Salinas Valley Basin before the June 30, 2017 deadline.
F12:
Many local individuals and entities have for several years been vitally interested in preserving, enhancing, and sustaining both groundwater and surface water availability in the Monterey Peninsula-Salinas Valley areas.
F13:
As a result of past efforts, there are several existing and planned projects that could logically be included in any GSPs adopted within the Monterey Peninsula- Salinas Valley areas, since each such project impacts groundwater sustainability.
F14:
Some of the existing and planned projects for logical inclusion in a local GSP include: a. The Salinas Valley Reclamation Plant (SVRP) and the Castroville Seawater Intrusion Project (CSIP) Distribution System. b. The Pure Water Monterey Groundwater Replenishment Project. c. The Soledad Water Recycling / Reclamation Project. d. The Salinas Valley Water Project. e. The Seaside Aquifer Storage & Recovery Project. f. The California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program. g. The Groundwater Extractions Monitoring System. h. The Salinas River Arundo Removal Project. i. The Interlake Tunnel Project. The Cal-Am Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project. j. k. The DeepWater Desal Desalination/Data Center Project I. The Marina Coast Water District Desalination Project m. The People's Moss Landing Water Desalination Project n. The Sand City Water Supply Project o. Urban Water Conservation p. Agricultural Water Conservation
F15:
As with other legislation that impacts those with divergent interests, legal maneuvering and delaying tactics can, in the case of SGMA, cause the loss of local controls over groundwater planning and management.
Recomendaciones relacionadas (1)
R1:
That every public and private entity interested in the formation of a GSA and the adoption of a GSP for the Salinas Valley Basin pledge to consider the groundwater needs of every other interested party with an open mind and a commitment to fairness.
F16:
As with other legislation that impacts those with divergent interests, legal maneuvering and delaying tactics can, in the case of SGMA, cause already critical groundwater conditions in Monterey County to get much worse, to the detriment of all concerned.
Vista rápida
Detalles completos →
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
8 hallazgos
F1:
Many children enter school with a limited vocabulary and lack of school readiness.
F2:
There are no District preschool programs that provide aftercare.
F3:
Grades 2–6 do not have aides who can provide teacher assistance in classroom tasks and small-group work.
F4:
Students who are not reclassified to Fluent English Proficient status prevents them from taking the high school courses necessary to meet college entrance “a to g” requirements.
F5:
There is low parent participation in school meetings, programs and activities.
F6:
Insufficient time is available for collaboration between District teachers and admini- stration.
F7:
Inadequate time is allocated to parent/teacher conferences to enable parents to be involved and support their child in school.
F8:
The shortage of credentialed teachers has resulted in the District hiring not-yet- credentialed and substitute teachers to fill the vacant teaching positions.
Recomendaciones adicionales
6
No vinculadas a hallazgos específicos.
R1:
Provide affordable on-site aftercare for preschool and pre-K classes.
R2:
Increase parent(s) participation and awareness of school meetings, programs and activities by requiring a parent orientation when a new student is registered for school. This orientation should be included in the 2016-17 student registration.
R3:
Hire aides to work in grade 2-6 classrooms who can provide teacher assistance with small-group work and other non-credentialed tasks. Hiring of these aides should be accomplished in the 2016-17 school year.
R4:
Compensate teachers for the additional time spent outside their designated in- structional period to collaborate with parents, and other teachers. 78
R5:
Make reclassification to Fluent English Proficiency status a priority by the end of 6th grade, and stress the importance of this in teacher in-service trainings beginning in the 2016-17 school year.
R6:
Seek and encourage partnerships with community agencies, civic groups, local business and foundations (e.g. First 5 Monterey County, Salinas City Library “paleteros”) to sponsor school readiness services and student academic support.
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.