Score: +12 (12/11/0)
Monterey County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Pacific Grove Sewage Spill*

Published: May 18, 2015 19 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
MRWPCA is responsible for the May 18, 2015, sanitary sewer overflow at Fountain Avenue, Pacific Grove. They own and operate said pump station, and were making repairs there when the overflow occurred.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
MRWPCA did not have a procedure to address potential false pressure readings during valve maintenance on May 18, 2015.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
MRWPCA implement staff training to account for and manage situations of false equipment readings.
F3
Diverting the SSO into the Monterey Bay prevented a costlier and hazardous uncontrolled overflow. MRWPCA's response in dealing with the May 18 SSO was appropriate given the alternative.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The condition of PG owned sewer infrastructure was unrelated to the circumstances of the SSO on May18, 2015.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
PG fulfilled its obligation in the Ecological Rights Foundation v. City of Pacific Grove Case #CO3-2612 PVT.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
PG has so far only approved projects outlined in the 2014 SSMP when matching funds are available.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The City of Pacific Grove prioritize sewer projects based on severity of pipe degradation and public need.
R4
The City of Pacific Grove actively seek matching funds for the sewer projects.
F7
Due to rate increases from Proposition 218, PG will have sufficient funds to resolve the sewer infrastructure issues identified in the 2014 SSMP.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The City of Pacific Grove annually budget for sewer projects using Proposition 218 funds and other funds as they become available.
F8
PG is sufficiently maintaining its sanitary sewer system through its contracts with Greenline and Root Tamers.
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 3

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.