Gran Jurado del Condado de Imperial
2013-2014
Vista rápida
Detalles completos →
Hallazgos & Recomendaciones
2 hallazgos
F1:
ECPW’s use of the prequalification forms used in bid documents for all ARAM projects appears to have been written in a manner in which only one contractor can meet the requirement. This is because the prequalification requirements are so specific in terms of the representative projects location and timeframe. This may limit fair opportunity and the competitive nature of the bidding process. It may violate requirements set forth in the California Public Contract Code, section 3400 (b).
F2:
There is enough information found to give the appearance that proper procedures were not followed. California has applicable laws for such things which may have been violated.
Recomendaciones adicionales
2
No vinculadas a hallazgos específicos.
R1:
ECPW should eliminate use of or change the language in the prequalification forms on ARAM projects to allow for fair and equally competitive bidding practices that comply with California Public Contract Code, specifically Section 3400.
R2:
ECPW should ensure that they are not in violation of California or other laws which may apply in these matters. Response Required: The Imperial County Civil Grand Jury requires a written response within 90 days of the publication of this report. Note to the reader: The following pages of attachments are included as parts of this report. Attachment A1 Attachment A2 Attachment B Attachment C1 Attachment C2 Attachment C Picture 1 Attachment C Picture 2 Attachment C Picture 3