📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F1
Page 36
ECPW’s use of the prequalification forms used in bid documents for all ARAM projects appears to have been written in a manner in which only one contractor can meet the requirement. This is because the prequalification requirements are so specific in terms of the representative projects location and timeframe. This may limit fair opportunity and the competitive nature of the bidding process. It may violate requirements set forth in the California Public Contract Code, section 3400 (b).
F2
Page 36
There is enough information found to give the appearance that proper procedures were not followed. California has applicable laws for such things which may have been violated.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 36ECPW should eliminate use of or change the language in the prequalification forms on ARAM projects to allow for fair and equally competitive bidding practices that comply with California Public Contract Code, specifically Section 3400.
-
R2Page 36ECPW should ensure that they are not in violation of California or other laws which may apply in these matters. Response Required: The Imperial County Civil Grand Jury requires a written response of the publication of this report. Note to the reader: The following pages of attachments are included as parts of this report. Attachment A1 Attachment A2 Attachment B Attachment C1 Attachment C2 Attachment C Picture 1 Attachment C Picture 2 Attachment C Picture 3