Ventura County Grand Jury
• 1994-1995
Allocation of Funding for Swimming Pool at Oxnard Union High School
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
The pool was not included in the original contract requirements for the new Oxnard Hiih School.
F2
The land purchase for the new school was a contentious issue with other government agencies. lt is unfortunate that it was not possible to reconcile the desires of the District, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors. The result is that the School has 27 acres of land it doesn’t need, and the students do not have a pool. No one can be proud of that result.
F3
Both sides on this issues are sincere about having a swimming pool at the new Oxnard High School.
F4
The Grand Jury considered the maintenance of the old high school swimming pool a secondary issue and that part of the complaint was not addressed.
Recommendations 2
-
R1The Oxnard Union High School District should not deviate from its Five Year Plan to construct a high school swimming pool.
-
R2The citizen groups should continue to develop financial support to augment the Developer Fees fund, thereby making the pool facility available in the shortest possible time. RESPONSER EQUIRED None. 101