Tulare County Grand Jury • 2014-2015

articleMooney Grove Park

12 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
There have been a number of activities (e.g. dances, concessions, etc.) tried in the park that have failed to generate adequate funds to continue their operations.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The current drought has created an environmental impact to the park.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The tree species diversity has increased. County Officials wish to make the park trees more of an arboretum with species labeled, as opposed to an oak preserve.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Based on the Mooney Grove Park 20-Year Master Plan, new Valley Oak trees are to be planted away from the heavily used areas. County Officials are concerned about the potential dangers of heavy oak limbs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
There should be more emphasis in planting Valley Oaks in the park.
F5
Also addressed in the Mooney Grove Park 20-Year Master Plan, animals pose a problem with respect to the cleanliness of the sidewalks, tables, and benches.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The County should establish the optimum number of animals in the park, balancing Federal and State rules and the needs of the public for a healthy park environment.
F6
Park fees, (entrance and arbor) only pay for part of the costs to operate the park; the rest is general funded. Entrance fees are collected only on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
There are currently a number of proposals for changes in Mooney Grove Park.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Presently, there are no food concessions or amusement rides within the park or museums.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Mobile vendors could be contracted to drive through the park to sell wares to give the public an opportunity to buy.

Additional Recommendations 2

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.