📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Alameda County Grand Jury • 2021-2022

Probate Conservatorship Cries Out for Reform

24 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F15 Page 71
The Public Defender’s probate conservatorship unit is severely understaffed and overworked, meaning that proposed conservatees with means receive a far higher level of service than the indigent.
F16 Page 71
The failure of the Public Defender to gather data on conservatorship case outcomes, implement formal training procedures, and establish a formal grievance process for clients, in addition to its reliance on paper files, hampers its ability to identify trends, stay up to date on best practices, and learn from past experience.
F17 Page 71
The lack of a contract between Alameda County and its conservatorship defense providers that outlines the expected scope of representation means that not all proposed conservatees receive the same level of service and raises the risk of litigation against the county.
F18 Page 71
Involuntary conservatorship proceedings can quickly drain proposed conservatees’ estates, which would not occur under a recorder’s fee- or grant-funded model.

Recommendations 8