Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
• Agency Response
Mendocino County Special Education Local Plan Area Mendocino County Selpa*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
The SELPA cost pools used to defray legal costs effectively hold school districts harmless because unbudgeted legal costs are back-filled from these SELPA carve-offs. Response to F1: The Policy Council disagrees in part with this finding. The SELPA's annual budget includes a cost pool for LEA legal costs. LEAs in the SELPA can submit their own legal costs for reimbursement from this fund. This includes legal costs that respond to due process complaints or legal costs that are preventative in nature. This pooling of legal costs lowers legal costs for all SELPA members, which benefits students who reside in Mendocino County. In order to be eligible for this reimbursement, legal 1 This information can be found in the SELPA's current local plan, Section B, publicly available here: https://www.mendoselpa.us/district/Portal/selpa-local-plan. fees must relate to the provisions of a free and appropriate public education or dispute concerns related to qualification for special education services. The set aside amount of this cost pool does not exceed $72,000 annually. Each LEA can submit a request to access the cost pool at the end of the school year. It may be that, due to needs identified during the year, this pool does not fund 100% of the requests. If the amount requested exceeds the amount set aside, the funds are distributed on a prorated basis.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The GJ could find no evidence that the policies and procedures of the SELPA effectively monitor or analyze how well their legal settlement cost pool policies positively or negatively affect the learning outcomes of the students in our county school districts. Response to F2: The Policy Council disagrees with this finding. The Policy Council reviews the budget at several meetings every year and engages in extensive discussion on how to best use funds to maximize learning outcomes for students in the SELPA. This budget review includes a review of all of the cost pools, including the legal cost pool. The Policy Council's meetings are governed by the Ralph M. Brown Act, and all meetings are public. Agendas and minutes are available on the Policy Council website or by contacting the SELPA.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The SELPA governing board pays attention to budgets but there are no apparent professional repercussions or consequences for school district superintendents who overuse SELPA legal fee cost-pool set aside funds. Response to F3: The Policy Council disagrees with this finding. Firstly, it is not the Policy Council's role be to provide "professional repercussions or consequences for school district superintendents," but rather, to oversee and amend funding allocations. Secondly, there is no evidence that any school district is overusing any of the SELPA's cost pools.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
There is no CAC parental representative on the SELPA Governing Board, as required in the SELPA bylaws. The SELPA has failed to fill this vital role for the past two years. Response to F4: The Policy Council disagrees in part with this finding. The Policy Council agrees that it has not been able to replace the former parent representative on the CAC since January of 2022; however, it is not for lack of trying. Every SELPA is required to establish a CAC where the majority of members are parents of students with disabilities. Additional members might include teachers, school personnel, and/or adults with disabilities. The CAC members can be appointed through several methods: selected by their peers, nominated through their district, or chosen after participating in an application or voting process. The CAC advises the Policy Council and SELPA executive director regarding the development, amendment, and review of the Mendocino County Special Education Local Plan. It is within the scope of the CAC to recommend priorities or changes to be addressed by the Local Plan. The Mendocino County SELPA has been without a parent representative since January 2022, when the then-current representative passed away. No parent representative has been appointed since then as there are no active parent members in the CAC. To address this, the SELPA has engaged in extensive efforts to get parent representatives on the CAC, including: Emails to parents and community partners (who have signed up to receive emails) expressing the need for representatives, including an at-large member to serve as a voting member for the SELPA's Steering Committee and Policy Council; Emails to the same group announcing CAC member meetings throughout the 0 year; Posting of CAC meeting flyers on the Mendocino County SELPA CAC site; 0 Asking the SELPA's special education directors to encourage parents to 0 participate in CAC; and Posting CAC meeting flyers and reminders on pages associated with Facebook Groups made up of parents of students with special needs. RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS:
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.