📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Plumas County Grand Jury
• 2016-2017
Board of Supervisors Needs to Take Grand Jury Seriously
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 23
The Grand Jury finds that some of the members of the Board of Supervisors were not presented with all the facts prior to voting on their letter to the Court.
F2
Page 23
The Grand Jury finds the Board of Supervisors do not have knowledge of the responsibilities of the Grand Jury or Penal Codes 933 and 933.05.
F3
Page 23
The Grand Jury finds the Board of Supervisors did not legally respond to the
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 23The Grand Jury recommends the sitting Board of Supervisors becomes knowledgeable in the responsibilities and duties of the Grand Jury.
-
R2Page 24The Grand Jury recommends that prior to voting on any issue all documents, codes, and laws concerning that issue be presented to the full Board.
-
R3Page 24The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors legally respond to the recommendations in the 2015/2016 Report.
-
R4Page 24The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors follow Penal Code 933 and 933.05 prior to responding to all future Grand Jury recommendations.