Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2013-2014 • Agency Response

2.1 Crosswalks

Published: June 02, 2014 5 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
Countywide, the markings of crosswalks are inconsistent in appearance and condition. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: Countywide (including the cities), crosswalks have the same visual look because every agency has adopted the position that such crosswalks marking will be consistent with the CVC and the CA MUTCD. Crosswalks are painted in white but if marked within a school zone they must be painted in yellow. Differences in style – perpendicular lines or parallel bars are discretionary per CVC and the CA MUTCD so either is acceptable. This style is a choice – color is prescribed.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Crosswalk conditions affect pedestrian safety as well as driver safety. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: CVC chapter 5 “Pedestrians’ Rights and Duties” - too long and detailed to quote here - yet it suffices to say the main point is vehicles must “exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon the roadway.” Pedestrians have a right to be there and if pedestrians have to cross the road without a “marked cross walk,” pedestrians must yield to vehicles. If there is a marked crosswalk then vehicles must yield to pedestrians. That being said, MCDoT does not have all our crosswalks marked with signage on each side. We are upgrading to make crosswalks more visible to drivers by installing consistent signage all around to protect pedestrians.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Pedestrian assumption that a crosswalk is safe is not true. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: Two painted lines do not provide protection against an oncoming vehicle. The real burden of safety has to be on the vehicle drivers, and pedestrians need to be alert and cautious while crossing any street. As stated above: CVC chapter 5 “Pedestrians’ Rights and Duties” - vehicles must “exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon the roadway.” Pedestrians have a right to be there and if pedestrians have to cross the road without a “marked cross walk,” pedestrians must yield to vehicles. If there is a marked crosswalk then vehicles must yield to pedestrians.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The increased use of electronic devices by pedestrians and drivers creates an additional distraction reducing the safety of everyone. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: Driver distraction is a leading factor in many crashes, and cell phone use and texting are two of the most common distractions. There are laws to address these behaviors for drivers and maybe they should pass laws for pedestrians using crosswalks or any street.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The lack of consistent or visible signage in many locations contributes to unsafe crosswalks. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: The lack of consistent or visible signage does not contribute to unsafe crosswalks; no factual evidence has been presented from CHP collision reports to document a reoccurring problem in our crosswalks. Installing signage in compliance with state and federal standards increases visibility. Drivers and pedestrians need to remain safe, alert, and courteous.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The default timing of traffic lights is insufficient for safe crossing in crosswalks especially for physically challenged, elderly, and very young pedestrians. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: The design and operation of traffic control signals should take into consideration the needs of pedestrians. Where pedestrian movements regularly occur, pedestrians should be provided with sufficient time to cross the roadway by adjusting the timing to provide sufficient crossing time every cycle. The CA MUTCD 2012, Section 4E.06, states that “the pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to accommodate the walking speed of the 15th percentile pedestrian, meaning that 85% walk faster. A walking speed between 3.5 and 4 feet per second may be used for the pedestrian clearance time if an engineering study at a representative location documents that it is sufficient to accommodate the walking speed of the 15th percentile pedestrian.” However, this same section also states that “where older or disabled pedestrians routinely use the crosswalk, a walking speed of 2.8 feet per second may be used in determining the pedestrian clearance time.” All traffic control signals are different and there default times vary according to pedestrian walking speeds. As stated above - CVC chapter 5 “Pedestrians’ Rights and Duties” - vehicles must “exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon the roadway.” Pedestrians have a right to be there and if pedestrians have to cross the road without a “marked cross walk,” pedestrians must yield to vehicles, even if the light changes while crossing slower than average. Again, drivers and pedestrians need to be safe, alert, and courteous.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
All possible ways to cross at intersecting roads are not always marked. MCDoT Response, Disagree partially: Not all possible ways to cross at intersecting roads are marked. Crosswalks are marked only where necessary for the guidance and control of pedestrians, to direct them to the safest of several potential routes. Pedestrians can still cross at unmarked locations - CVC chapter 5 “Pedestrians’ Rights and Duties” – if pedestrians have to cross the road without a “marked cross walk,” pedestrians must yield to vehicles. If there is a marked crosswalk then vehicles must yield to pedestrians.
No recommendations for this finding