⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
2 findings
The failure to include the "Figure 4 map" and references to it in the staff report was at best inept staff performance or at worst deliberate deception. Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The Board of Supervisors partially disagrees with the finding and adopts the response by the Department of Planning and Building as the Board of Supervisors Response to this Finding (see attached response by the Department of Planning and Building shown as Attachment 2).
Related Recommendations (1)
The Planning Commission should require relevant source documents accompany reports from the Planning and Building Department. 07-21-2009 Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. The recommendation is already a part of the Planning and Building Department procedures and practice.
The staff report was a crucial element in an important decision by the Planning Commission and it was only public testimony at the Commission hearing that prevented a decision counter to approved land use policy. Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The Board of Supervisors partially disagrees with this finding and adopts the response by the Department of Planning and Building as the Board of Supervisors Response to this Finding (see attached response by the Department of Planning and Building shown as Attachment 2). The staff report concluded that the sale of County land to State Parks was in compliance with County land use policy, a conclusion consistent with the report only because of the omission of the "Figure 4 map" and related text. Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The Board of Supervisors partially disagrees with this finding and adopts the response by the Department of Planning and Building as the Board of Supervisors Response to this Finding (see attached response by the Department of Planning and Building shown as Attachment 2). GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Planning Commission should require relevant source documents accompany reports from the Planning and Building Department. 07-21-2009 Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. The recommendation is already a part of the Planning and Building Department procedures and practice.
Related Recommendations (1)
The Planning Commission should direct Planning and Building Department staff to indicate to the Planning Commission if any source documentations were altered in preparing reports and provide reasons for such alterations. Recommended Board of Supervisors Response The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. The recommendation is already a part of the Planning and Building Department procedures and practice.
Additional Recommendations
1
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
No Responses Found
1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
