Humboldt County Grand Jury
• 2017-2018
• Agency Response
Response to Grand Jury Report Report Title: Humboldt County’s Future, “Scene” Through the Looking Glass Report Date:
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F3, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F2
Page 2
The Board of Supervisors has not yet communicated and implemented a clear and viable vision for the county, nor have they developed a strategic plan supporting such a vision. Response: Disagree. While each member of the Board of Supervisors is an independently elected official accountable only to their own constituents, the Board has come together repeatedly over the last several years to work with the community and county leadership to develop a vision for the county. This vision has been expressed through the annual revisions to the Board’s Strategic Framework, and more specific documents supporting that framework such as the General Plan, Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, development of the Facilities Master Plan, Emergency Operations Plan, the Blue Ribbon Taskforce, Housing Trust Fund Committee and more. County department heads are scheduled to re-convene in October to further this strategic planning process.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 3
The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors task county government with performing a study on county work functions to determine which ones can be merged, how to increase collaboration, and how to reduce silos where warranted. This study should be completed and presented to the Board of Supervisors by December 31, 2018. Response: This recommendation has been implemented. On January 9, 2018 the Board approved an agreement with Cooperative Personnel Services to review and evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages associated with centralizing services and staffing resources of Information Technology, Human Resources, Accounts Payable and Payroll within the county. The results of this study will likely come back to the Board before the end of FY 2018-19. In addition, the Board has taken action in the past to consolidate and centralize services. In 2015 the Board merged the Coroner’s Office with the Sheriff. In November 2016 the Board placed two measures on the ballot to create a Department of Finance. If passed, the measures would have merged the offices of the Treasurer-Tax Collector and Auditor-Controller.
F4
Page 2
Humboldt County leadership seems unfamiliar with the value of creating and implementing a Continuous lmprovement Program. Response: Disagree. The county many years ago dedicated itself to becoming a high performing organization (HPO) in order to increase efficiency of service delivery and to adjust to the challenges of tomorrow. This requires taking actions like increasing employee engagement, making investments in technology, and increasing investments in personnel. This must be done on a departmental level as well as county-wide. To that end, the county has formed a group called Hum21 that is comprised of representatives from each department. This group forms teams to take on tasks such as property tax processing, information technology planning, All Hands Training Day, county-wide professional development and services like the county website. Measuring the success of these efforts in terms of saving money is difficult. However, it should be noted that since 2013, the county’s budget has increased by 26 percent (from $305.5 million in FY 2013-14 to $412.4 million om FY 201819) while the number of personnel has increased by only 12.2 percent (2022.75 funded positions in FY 2013-14, and 2305.66 funded positions in FY 2018-19), meaning that the county’s current workforce is handling more responsibility with fewer staff.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 4
The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury recommends that this Vision of Humboldt County be shared with county and city governments, and county citizens during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018-2019. Response: This recommendation has already been implemented. The county’s 20-year Vision was adopted by the Board in May and shared on the county’s website. Further, the county will incorporate the 20-year vision in to its employee onboarding process
F10
Page 3
Humboldt County leadership decisions in the past often maintained the status quo rather than offering creative solutions for the future. Response: Disagree. Humboldt County has a long and proud history of offering creative solutions for the future. For example, Humboldt County was a model around the state for integrated health and human services delivery when it combined Social Services, Mental Health and Public Health into one agency roughly 10 years ago. Humboldt County is part of a first- of-its-kind Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group, which helps plan for earthquakes, the consequences of which are unique to our area. Humboldt has consistently led the state when it comes to cannabis regulations and environmental stewardship, including joining the North Coast Resource Partnership. Just last year Humboldt County won six Challenge Awards form the California State Association of Counties for its innovative programs and efforts.
No recommendations for this finding