San Benito County Grand Jury • 2007-2008

2007 / 2008 San Benito County - Civil Grand Jury Report*

Published: July 31, 2008 268 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 15 findings

F1
The Animal Shelter's hours of operation make it unavailable to the majority of the community as it is not open during the lunch hour or on weekends. This is contrary to the Hayden Law.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The shelter staff is now producing summary reports in a timely manner.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The data inaccuracies in the reports were due to a software problem. The software vendor is working to correct the software and it should be completed by the end of May 2008.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
For fiscal year 2006-2007, the Animal Shelter deficit was $80,000.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The new Animal Shelter facility is due to open by the end of July 2008.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The new Animal Shelter facility has no plans for a new drop box due to unavailability of funds.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
The City website provides no information on what to do if a stray animal is found after shelter hours or instructions on how to use the Drop box.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
No agency provided evidence that a physical audit of kennel cleaning and drop box use was performed.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The Animal Shelter Duty Manual is several years out of date.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The Animal Shelter Duty Manual includes content that is inconsistent with the State Food and Agriculture Codes.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The San Benito County Code, Animals and Fowl, Chapter 4 is outdated and contains numerous anomalies and inconsistencies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Review and update the San Benito County Code, Animals and Fowl, Chapter 4 to incorporate the latest California Food and Agriculture Codes. Also, make sure the County Code is consistent with the Hollister Animal Shelter Duty Manual and Hollister Police Department Animal Control Operations Section 321 (based on F11).
F12
Juvenile Hall's security control panel is out-of-date.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The bathtub and shower stalls are unsafe in that they have slippery or corroded surfaces.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
The single fence structure, with green tarp covering, is inadequate for the proper security and safety of young wards.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Juvenile Hall has no emergency generator for back-up power. COMMENTS (OPTIONAL) The Juvenile Hall was built in 1992, at the same time as the San Benito County Jail was being constructed. During this 2007-2008 session, Grand Jury also completed an inspection of the Jail and found the two facilities to be in complete contrast. The jail is clean, bright, and neat. Although the Juvenile Hall is generally clean, it looks dilapidated, messy, and cluttered. The air at the jail is comfortable throughout most of the facility. The part of the jail that has poor air quality uses a swamp cooler system. The Juvenile Hall has a swamp cooler system in the part of the building in which its wards live, sleep, and study. Unlike the Juvenile Hall, the Jail is kept in top condition by its own maintenance worker. The Jail also has a new state-of-the-art security control system in place, while the Juvenile Hall continues to wait for a replacement to its original security control panel. Two Grand Jury members who took part in the 2006-2007 Grand Jury Juvenile Hall inspection observed that the conditions of the physical plant have deteriorated in the past year.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 16

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.