📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2020-2021

Grand Jury Report Final Report 2020 - 2021 About the Cover:

Published: September 30, 2022 98 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 17 findings

F1 Page 73
Board members are prohibited by WCWD Policies and Procedures from communicating directly with district staff other than the General Manager.
F2 Page 73
Therefore, a director cannot obtain non-publicly available information from district staff about district operations without the General Manager’s consent.
F3 Page 73
The General Manager determines the agenda for district board meetings in consultation with the Board president.
F4 Page 73
Alternatively, a Board member may place an item on the meeting agenda, but only with a Board majority vote.
F5 Page 73
The Board has given the General Manager the discretion to spend up to $50,000 (per vendor per fiscal year) of WCWD funds for district maintenance and operations without Board approval.
F6 Page 73
Board members can review the check register for the WCWD’s general fund, but the General Manager’s discretionary expenditures are not segregated or identified on the check register. 8The Government Code addresses when claims against employees brought by third parties are paid by the governmental entity. See, e.g., Gov. Code, §§ 995, 995.2 and 995.4 et seq. Contra Costa County 2020-2021 Grand Jury Report 2103 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
F7 Page 74
In the Board’s 2020 investigation of two directors, the Board allocated a $1000 stipend to each to obtain legal advice. In the Board’s most recent investigation of the same directors, no stipends were paid.
F8 Page 74
The WCWD has no written policy on when or under what circumstances it will pay for a director’s legal expenses.
F9 Page 85
Decentralized IT structures increase vulnerability to cyber-attacks. Contra Costa County 2020-2021 Grand Jury Report 2104 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
F10 Page 86
The County’s IT structure is decentralized.
F11 Page 86
Based on interviews, Contra Costa County is at a disadvantage to hire IT staff with cyber security expertise due to increased compensation and perks offered by some private enterprises.
F12 Page 102
Measure X funding has not been allocated for CCAS operations.
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services.
F14
BHS has not followed the directives of the California Telehealth Advancement Act of 2011 to develop telehealth services to better meet the needs of underserved populations in the community.
F15
The Congressional Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 expands Medicare services to allow tele-mental health services to be integrated with in-person sessions, and to be received by beneficiaries in their home without geographic limitations.
F16
BHS lacks an adequate electronic data system to evaluate the efficacy of outpatient mental health services provided. Contra Costa County 2020-2021 Civil Grand Jury Report 2102 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
F17
BHS does not collect clinical data from network providers, which limits accountability for the outpatient mental health services provided to county residents.

Recommendations 11