📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Alameda County Grand Jury
• 2005-2006
Oakland Police Department Overtime
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
Page 44
OPD has made improvements in the special events overtime assignment process. The Grand Jury believes that with proper adherence to these new policies, the appearance of favoritism will be reduced.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 44
With respect to patrol overtime assignments and the mandatory overtime system that OPD implemented, the Grand Jury found no evidence of corruption or favoritism.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 44
The Grand Jury’s analysis of overtime records, departmental policies and witness testimony demonstrated no evidence of corruption or favoritism in sideshow overtime. The Grand Jury urges future grand juries to continue monitoring these changes and improvements. 44 2005-2006 Alameda County Civil Grand Jury Final Report
No recommendations for this finding