San Francisco County Grand Jury
• 2010-2011
Log Cabin Ranch Moving Towards Positive Horizons Civil Grand Jury City and County of San Francisco
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 10 findings
F1
Recommendation 1 The current educational program Increase collaboration among the Juvenile Probation does not take advantage of the San Francisco Conservation Corps, Department. beautiful natural environment of the San Francisco Unified School the site, which offers multiple District and Urban Sprouts to hands‐on teaching opportunities. develop projects which utilize the natural environment for outdoor education opportunities including gardening, landscaping, native plant restoration, pond maintenance, creek habitat restoration, trail creation and hiking.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Increase collaboration among the San Francisco Conservation Corps, the San Francisco Unified School District and Urban Sprouts to develop projects which utilize the natural environment for outdoor education opportunities including gardening, landscaping, native plant restoration, pond maintenance, creek habitat restoration, trail creation and hiking. Response required: Juvenile Probation Department
F2
Recommendation 2 Thorough and meaningful As sufficient data become Juvenile Probation program evaluation based upon available, establish relationships Department solid data about Log Cabin with local graduate schools in Residents following graduation is disciplines such as Social Work and needed. The Grand Jury Psychology who may be able to acknowledges that the improved assist with outcome assessment Log Cabin Ranch program does and evaluation as there are a not currently provide sufficient number of thesis topics for their data about its graduates. students. However, program assessment based upon such data is sorely needed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
As sufficient data become available, establish relationships with local graduate schools in disciplines such as Social Work and Psychology who may be able to assist with outcome assessment and evaluation as there are a number of thesis topics for their students. Response required: Juvenile Probation Department
F3
Recommendation 3 Log Cabin Ranch needs an Explore the possibilities of Juvenile Probation effective “Enterprise Program” developing a contractual Department which could generate additional relationship with both the San operational and programmatic Francisco Department of Public revenue. Works and the Department of Parks and Recreation for the Log Cabin Ranch residents to sell to them benches and picnic tables made at the Ranch for use on city streets and in city parks.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Explore the possibilities of developing a contractual relationship with both the San Francisco Department of Public Works and the Department of Parks and Recreation for the Log Cabin Ranch residents to sell to them benches and picnic tables made at the Ranch for use on city streets and in city parks. Response required: Juvenile Probation Department
F4
Recommendation 4 Juvenile Probation Despite well intentioned efforts The Log Cabin Planning Committee, Department. there still remains “turf battles” which currently meets only on an among the stakeholders. ad‐hoc basis, should become a District Attorney permanent committee meeting quarterly to build on its original Public Defender successes. The Committee should be used as forum to discuss and address long held negative biases and “turf‐battles “ among the stakeholders. Further tasks could include: (1) exploring the expansion of involvement of community‐based organizations with the Ranch; (2) exploring and seeking additional funding opportunities from private foundations and other sources; and (3) expanding and broadening the vocational opportunities currently offered at the Ranch.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Log Cabin Planning Committee, which currently meets only on an ad hoc basis, should become a permanent committee meeting quarterly to build on its original success. The committee should be used as a forum to discuss and address long held negative biases and “turf‐battles “ among the stakeholders. Further tasks could include: (1) exploring the expansion of involvement of community‐based organizations with the Ranch; (2) exploring and seeking additional funding opportunities from private foundations and other sources; and (3) expanding and broadening the vocational opportunities currently offered at the Ranch. Response required: Juvenile Probation Department, District Attorney, Public Defender
F5
Recommendation 5 Due to the age of the buildings The Mayor and the Board of Mayor (circa, 1950), structural Supervisors should immediately improvements to the Ranch are provide capital funding for long Board of Supervisors greatly needed. neglected infrastructure needs
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Mayor and the Board of Supervisors should immediately provide capital funding for long neglected infrastructure needs. Response required: Mayor and Board of Supervisors
F6
Recommendation 6 The Grand Jury believes that the The Mayor and the Board of Mayor Log Cabin Ranch is under‐utilized Supervisor should support funding and the recent positive for a third cohort in the fiscal year Board of Supervisors programmatic changes warrant 2011‐2012 budget cycle and for a expansion to maximum capacity. fourth cohort in the 2012‐2013 budget cycle.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Mayor and the Board of Supervisors should support funding for a third cohort in the fiscal year 2011‐2012 budget cycle, and for a fourth cohort in the 2012‐2013 budget cycle. Response required: Mayor and Board of Supervisors
F7
Recommendation 7 Current vocational programs Vocational and apprenticeship Juvenile Probation offered at the Ranch set up the programs should be developed in Department residents for disappointment fields such as auto mechanics, because permanent jobs are not metal working and welding, pipe San Francisco Unified available in those areas of fitting, solar panel installation or School District. training. Additionally, training is other union affiliated positions. not adequate for entry level positions.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Vocational and apprenticeship programs should be developed in fields such as auto mechanics, metal working and welding, pipe fitting, solar panel installation or other union‐affiliated positions. Response required:: Juvenile Probation Department, San Francisco Unified School District
F8
Recommendation 8 In the opinion of the Grand Jury, . There should regular and on‐going Juvenile Probation not all members of the Log Cabin training in the Missouri Model of all Department Ranch staff have fully embraced Ranch employees, regardless of the tenants of the Missouri their classification or department Model. affiliation. Employee evaluations should include an assessment of the employee’s ability to properly utilize the model in his/her interactions with the residents. For the Ranch to be successful all stakeholders must be using the same language and be on the same philosophical path. .
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
There should be regular and on‐going training in the Missouri Model for all Ranch employees, regardless of their classification or department affiliation. Employee evaluations should include an assessment of the employee’s ability to properly utilize the model in his/her interactions with the residents. For the Ranch to be successful all stakeholders must be using the same language and be on the same philosophical path. Response required: Juvenile Probation department
F9
Recommendation 9 The basic high school program in . The San Francisco Unified School San Francisco Unified its current form offers a limited District should explore additional School District education curriculum. educational options that would challenge all Log Cabin Residents. These options could include programs such as the “Big Picture” model currently used at San Francisco court‐appointed schools or a charter school scenario. . . Recommendation 10 . Log Cabin Ranch should develop a Juvenile Probation speakers’ bureau and/or Department mentorship program that would bring people to the Ranch to share information about various occupations and the positives and negatives of those occupations . . . . Finding 10 . Recommendation 11 . . The Juvenile Collaborative . The Juvenile Probation Department . Juvenile Probation Reentry Program is currently only should immediately seek either City Department available to youth returning from or grant funding to expand the out‐of‐home placements such as Juvenile Collaborative Reentry Glen Mills and George Junior Team program to include youth Republic. This very successful reentering society from the Log program should also be available Cabin Ranch to students reentering from the Log Cabin Ranch.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The San Francisco Unified School District should explore additional educational options that would challenge all Log Cabin Residents. These options could include programs such as the “Big Picture” model currently used at San Francisco court‐appointed schools or a charter school scenario. Response required: San Francisco Unified School District
F10
The Juvenile Collaborative Reentry Program is currently only available to youth returning from out‐of‐home placements such as Glen Mills and George Junior Republic. This very successful program should also be available to students reentering from the Log Cabin Ranch.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Log Cabin Ranch should develop a speakers’ bureau and/or mentorship program that would bring people to the Ranch to share information about various occupations and the positives and negatives of those occupations. Response required: Juvenile Probation department
Additional Recommendations 2
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R11The Juvenile Probation Department should immediately seek either City or grant funding to expand the Juvenile Collaborative Reentry Team program to include youth reentering society from the Log Cabin Ranch. Response required: Juvenile Probation department
-
R17Response Matrix LOG CABIN RANCH: MOVING TOWARDS POSITIVE HORIZONS Log Cabin Ranch circa 1947 “ . . . Well, first of all, this is not a prison, this is not a jail, this is six hundred acres that can be developed into an incredible healing recovery center. There are no bars, there are no locks, it’s healthy, there’s fresh air. There’s this beautiful garden … getting away from the inner‐city, coming out here in this beautiful country area gives them new energy to live life, new spiritual awakenings just like they are somebody and that they have a culture, they have a story of their own and they have a future that’s real.”1 Jack Jacqua, 2003 Co‐founder Omega Boys Club INTRODUCTION California Penal Code Sections 919 (a) and 919 (b) authorize and mandate that the Civil Grand Jury inquire into the jails and public prisons within the county. Every year, in every county in California, one of the primary tasks of the local Civil Grand Jury is to tour and inspect the jails and detention facilities in its county. In September 2010 the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury toured the adult jail facilities located in San Bruno and the Hall of Justice building in San Francisco. The Jury also toured the mental health unit for prisoners located at the San Francisco General Hospital. All of these adult detention facilities are operated under the auspices of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department. The Jury also toured all of the juvenile detention facilities directed by the Juvenile Probation Department. These facilities include the detention facility located at 375 Woodside Avenue as well as the subject of this report, the Log Cabin Ranch, located in La Honda. The report issued by the 2004‐2005 Civil Grand Jury painted a very negative picture of the Log Cabin Ranch. The 2010‐2011 Civil Grand Jury observed a completely different place. There are clear signs of change and improvement. There is a new operating model in place that focuses on a smaller and more therapeutic approach to dealing with the juveniles. The facilities had undergone a refurbishment and appeared both welcoming and comfortable. The contrast was so striking that the current Jury felt that an updated report was warranted to commend and congratulate the Juvenile Probation Department on the dramatic improvement since the 2005 report. This prompted us to conduct a broader inquiry. Our investigation confirmed these remarkable improvements. However, we also discovered that the opinions and decisions of some stakeholders continue to be influenced by the negative perception of the previously mismanaged Log Cabin Ranch. The Civil Grand Jury hopes that this report will help to change those perceptions, allowing the Log Cabin Ranch to achieve its full potential as an extraordinary place for the rehabilitation of San Francisco’s most at‐risk juvenile offenders. SUMMARY For more than a century, the predominant model for the treatment, punishment and rehabilitation of serious juvenile offenders has been confinement in a large congregate‐care correctional facility. In most states this type of institution still houses most incarcerated youth and still consumes the majority of taxpayer spending on juvenile justice. The success record of these correctional facilities is dismal. Though many youth confined to these institutions are not serious or chronic offenders, the recidivism rates are extremely high. Violence and abuse are commonplace. Long‐term studies indicate that many youth housed in such facilities develop lifelong negative behaviors. A leading juvenile justice scholar at the University of Minnesota reported: “Evaluation research indicates that incarcerating young offenders in large congregate‐care juvenile institutions does not effectively rehabilitate and may actually harm them.”2 A new style of reform is gaining momentum. This is powered by a growing recognition that the conventional practices are not getting the job done. Accumulating evidence shows that better results are possible through a fundamentally different approach. Our investigation shows that there are two fundamental approaches. One is to substantially reduce the population confined in juvenile correctional institutions by screening out youth who pose minimal danger to public safety—placing them instead into cost‐effective, community‐ based rehabilitation and youth development programs. The second approach, devised by the State of Missouri’s juvenile corrections agency, aims at the small minority of youth offenders requiring out‐of‐home placement to protect the public safety. Two out‐of‐home juvenile rehabilitation‐treatment facilities frequently used by the San Francisco Juvenile Court for assignment are Glen Mills in Philadelphia and George Junior Republic (a mental health facility) in Pittsburgh. Both facilities are highly regarded by some members of the juvenile justice system. Numerous San Francisco teen‐offenders have been sent to these East Coast facilities for care and rehabilitation. The questions that beg to be answered are: Why send San Francisco juveniles 3,000 miles from home? Why not place these individuals at Log Cabin Ranch, just 45 miles south of the city?” Unfortunately, through years of neglect and improper management Log Cabin Ranch acquired an unfavorable reputation within the juvenile justice system. Juvenile court judges lost confidence in the effectiveness of the Ranch, became reticent to send offenders there, and began sentencing youth to these well regarded out‐of‐state programs. It is important to note that the Grand Jury received conflicting information regarding the success and the recidivism rates of one of these programs ‐ Glen Mills in Philadelphia. By comparison there is only anecdotal information about the recent success of the Log Cabin program. The good news for San Francisco is that in 2006 Log Cabin Ranch embarked on a transformation. This transformation began with the hiring of a new Chief Juvenile Probation Officer with a clear vision and the implementation of the “Missouri Model” (Appendix A) as a foundational element for change. The new Chief also brought in a strong administrative team, making Log Cabin Ranch a place of respectability once again. Log Cabin Ranch, circa 1950’s WHAT IS THE LOG CABIN RANCH? “We locked up. I mean, we ain’t really locked up but we not home. It’s out in the boonies, in the cuts. Big yard across the way, birds and deers. It’s kind of trippy, like, I ain’t never saw that where I’m from. Deers and stuff just walking heck close by you. I think it’s a good program because they give you a lot of time to think and they, they get you think about what you doing out there. Like this is your last step. The next step is like YA (Youth Authority) or something. So, it’s like a time out. It’s like a big time out for you to just think about what you doing and what you do that affects not only you, but like your peers, your family, you know, your community.”3 Log Cabin Ranch Resident The Log Cabin Ranch is not a youth prison. It is not a typical jail and was never intended for that purpose. It is a ranch camp‐school which provides services to troubled youth ages 14 to 18 years old. The fundamental emphasis is on rehabilitation and self‐empowerment through an academic and therapeutic process. Instead of standard correctional supervision, Log Cabin Ranch offers a structured multi‐layered treatment designed to challenge troubled juvenile males, to help them make lasting behavioral changes, and to prepare for a successful re‐entry to the community. The Ranch is conducive to developing vocational interests and activities sufficient to allow each boy the opportunity to demonstrate his adaptability toward rehabilitation. Located on more than 600 acres in and above the La Honda timberline the remarkable environment surrounding the Log Cabin Ranch is an important characteristic influencing rehabilitation. The juvenile offender who is rehabilitated today through the Log Cabin Ranch program is less likely to reoffend. However, the Grand Jury observed that the current educational program does not take advantage of this extraordinary natural environment for learning opportunities. Log Cabin Ranch is a story of troubled youth with choices to make, almost insurmountable odds, and an opportunity to discover positive alternatives. Steering just one high‐risk teen away from a life of crime saves society $3 million to $6 million in reduced victim costs and criminal justice expenses, plus increased wages and tax payments over the young person’s lifetime. LOG CABIN RANCH HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT Log Cabin Ranch has been in existence for over 70 years. It was approved as a juvenile detention center by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. (
Conclusions 1
-
CL1San Francisco’s Juvenile Probation Department has many stakeholders that support the Log Cabin Ranch though direct programming and services. The Division of Public Health, the San Francisco Unified School District and the San Francisco Public Library have all expanded their commitment to the Ranch through increased resources and a tremendous willingness to work with the Juvenile Probation Department. The California Corrections Standards Authority and the United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention have taken note of the extraordinary progress that has been made at Log Cabin Ranch. However, the San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department recognizes that much work needs to be done before the Log Cabin Ranch can become a national model. Primarily, the Ranch must grow to its full capacity. While this may be the most overwhelming task due to the City of San Francisco’s current fiscal challenges and projected budget deficit, it is perhaps the most important factor in establishing a robust program and determining meaningful results. It is crucial that all stakeholders set aside their departmental biases in order to benefit the young people being served in the San Francisco juvenile justice system. During its investigation the Civil Grand Jury was dismayed to witness that long‐held territorial squabbles exist among the stakeholders, i. e. the Public Defender’s office, the District Attorney’s office and the Juvenile Probation department, despite an obvious commitment from them to do what is best for the youth of San Francisco. Additional meaningful change can happen but it must come about with all stakeholders believing that change can happen, putting aside their negative perceptions of the Ranch, and moving forward. __________________________________________________________________________ 23 LOG CABIN RANCH
Commendations 1
-
CM1Thousands of young people deal with hunger, homelessness and unemployment every day. They also face the real prospect of getting “locked up.” Over 2,300 San Francisco youth face that prospect each year. For many of those young people, their first stop will be the Youth Guidance Center at 375 Woodside and then a court appearance to determine disposition. Some young people will fail informal probation, formal probation, and group homes and still be continually arrested. The options for dealing with this type of youth are very limited. The most severe cases may end up in the California Youth Authority, known as the “baby pen.” However, as the State of California begins to dismantle its juvenile justice system, the Log Cabin Ranch becomes a viable and effective option for these youth who are at the greatest risk. Our investigation found that there are many dedicated individuals working extremely hard to save San Franciscan juveniles who are unable to resist the lure of the streets. The 2010‐2011 San Francisco Civil Grand Jury wishes to thank all of the individuals and groups who care for the young men at Log Cabin Ranch. Your sacrifice, your commitment and your involvement make the difference between success and failure for these young men. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION The Jury began its investigation in October 2010. The investigation included a visit to the Youth Guidance Center in San Francisco, two visits to the Log Cabin Ranch in La Honda, and one to the James Ranch in Santa Clara County. The Jury also attended two court sessions concerning youth involved in the juvenile justice system. Interviews were conducted with the following: The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office The San Francisco Public Defender’s Office The Superior Court of San Francisco Log Cabin Ranch residents Parents and siblings of the residents of Log Cabin Ranch The Santa Clara Probation Department The San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department The San Francisco Unified School District The San Francisco Public Library The Jury also reviewed literature from local, regional, state and national sources involved in juvenile justice and rehabilitation programs. __________________________________________________________________________ 24 LOG CABIN RANCH