📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
San Joaquin County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Stockton Unified School District – Student Truancy Report (Case 11-08b)
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
Page 69
There are provisions for the owner of the seized documents to informally request copies from the District Attorney or by making a formal request to the Court.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 69
The Grand Jury finds that the Environmental Unit acted within the scope of its authority in this matter.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 73
Other California cities, such as Sacramento, have internet information systems that allow the public to search by category, property type, case number or address. Stockton code enforcement representatives agree that such a website feature would save time and money.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 73
On numerous occasions, CED has not been timely in notifying all parties involved in property sale transactions of the pending code citations. Prior to closing escrow, the escrow agent requests a payoff demand from CED. When CED responds to this request, a code enforcement officer makes a return visit to the property. If any new violations are found, the escrow holder is notified. This has caused delays in closing escrow and subsequent post-transaction problems for new property owners.
No recommendations for this finding