📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2012-2013

In the fall of 2012, Suhsd and Selpa informed us that they were working on a document to more clearly outline the

6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 30
There has been a lack of communication between SUHSD’s Special Education Department and the parents/guardians of special needs high school students regarding graduation options (Diploma vs. Certificate of Completion pathways).
F2 Page 30
There is no adequate forum for groups of parents/guardians to communicate with the special education staff on a regular and ongoing basis.
F3 Page 30
The Adult Transition Program Parents’ Club funds were not managed according to district policy; however, this has since been rectified.
F4 Page 30
The SUHSD Board of Trustees was responsive to several of the parents’ concerns, for example reinstating the use of a van and resuming recycling.
F5 Page 30
Based on the ratio of staff to students of 1:2, the SUHSD Adult Transition Program is staffed appropriately when compared to other local school districts.

Recommendations 2