📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2012-2013

In the fall of 2012, Suhsd and Selpa informed us that they were working on a document to more clearly outline the

6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 30
There has been a lack of communication between SUHSD’s Special Education Department and the parents/guardians of special needs high school students regarding graduation options (Diploma vs. Certificate of Completion pathways).
F2 Page 30
There is no adequate forum for groups of parents/guardians to communicate with the special education staff on a regular and ongoing basis.
F3 Page 30
The Adult Transition Program Parents’ Club funds were not managed according to district policy; however, this has since been rectified.
F4 Page 30
The SUHSD Board of Trustees was responsive to several of the parents’ concerns, for example reinstating the use of a van and resuming recycling.
F5 Page 30
Based on the ratio of staff to students of 1:2, the SUHSD Adult Transition Program is staffed appropriately when compared to other local school districts.

Recommendations 2