📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2010-2011

Forever Grssn, But Not Transparent: Why Does the Grand Jury Keep Investigating the Primary Public Defender Contract?

Published: September 01, 2010 1 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 2 findings

F2 Page 10
R3 Auditor-Controller October 1,2010 Santa Cruz County 90 Days
F3 Page 10
R1 Board of Supervisors September 1, 2010 Sources Documents/Publications 1991/92 Grand Jury Report: Public Defender’s Office 1994/95 Grand Jury Report: A Study of the Cost of Public Defender Services for Indigents 1998 Public Defender Transition Task Force Agendas and Memos 2006 Comparability Model 2008/09 Expenditure Actual Transactions Report for Professional and Special Services Budget Unit Financing Uses Detail – Public Defender FY 2008/09 Conflict attorney contracts Primary public defender contract (current) Primary public defender contractor’s quarterly reports to the CAO Santa Cruz County Budgets for FYs 2005/06 through 2009/10 Interviews Administrators and Personnel: County Administrative Office County Auditor-Controller’s Office County District Attorney’s Office Primary Public Defender Contractor Superior Court of California County of Santa Cruz Site Visits Superior Court of California County of Santa Cruz Web Sites http://www.buttecounty.net/Department%20Contacts.aspx http://www.co.marin.ca.us/ http://www.co.merced.ca.us/ http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/ http://www.co.shasta.ca.us/html/CAO/budgets.htm http://www.cpda.org/ http://www.placer.ca.gov/Departments/Auditor/Budget.aspx http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/site4.aspx

Recommendations 2