📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 7 findings
F1
Page 31
Section 8 Housing in Lake County is limited.
F2
Page 31
Only approximately 2% of applied-for EHV’s are awarded.
F3
Page 31
Homelessness has increased despite the funds that are spent for abatement.
F4
Page 31
Once a person or family becomes homeless, returning to a normal sheltered life seems insurmountable.
F5
Page 31
The housing voucher system is ineffective; essentially “broken” due, in part, to the loss of the housing supply as a result of wildfires since 2015.
F6
Page 31
The cost of homelessness abatement has risen along with everything else.
F7
Page 31
Government rules for homeless relief are too complex. RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 32That the Board of Supervisors investigate if a quick-response county-run Housing Agency would be more effective in finding, negotiating, and procuring available housing space in a shorter time to serve more clients with less delay. (F-1), F-2), (F-5), (F-7)
-
R2Page 32That the Board of Supervisors improve oversight of county-wide homeless services, including comprehensive use and analysis of HMIS data. (F-3), (F-5)
-
R3Page 32That the Board of Supervisors develop a comprehensive plan to increase low-income housing supply in Lake County. (F-3), (F-4), (F-5), (F-7). REQUEST FOR RESPONSE Pursuant to Penal Code, Sections 933, ad 933.5, the Grand Jury requests responses as follows: Board of Supervisors