Ventura County Grand Jury • 2007-2008

Ventura County Resource Management Agency: Customer Relations Findings & Conclusions F-01: The Rma staff does not*

Published: November 14, 2008 5 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings 11 findings

F01
The RMA staff does not receive formal training in customer service or public relations. Do Not Concur: The RMA provides a number of training opportunities and has recently initiated formal customer service training by an outside firm specializing in that field. See response to F-02 for more details.
F02
The customer relations program for the RMA consists of: Mission Statement Web site • Public Opinion forms [Att. 1-3] Several Municipal Advisory Committees in the Planning Division Do Not Concur: This finding does not include references to all training activities, and mischaracterizes the role of the Municipal Advisory Committees. All new RMA employees are field trained by veteran employees prior to conducting business with the public with no supervision. In addition, the Building and Safety Division conducts an annual inspection follow-up/Ride-Along program where our Senior Inspection and Enforcement Staff will either follow up after an inspector has visited a site or will ride-along with the inspector on a route. They will visit with the contractor or homeowner and seek information on how they perceived the inspection conducted by our staff. The purpose of this program is to both ensure that our field staff is conducting the county's business in a manner that reflects positively on the Division but also to ensure they are accurate and consistent in their inspection procedures. Also, all employees in RMA are encouraged to attend County-sponsored training classes (such as "Real Colors" and "Verbal Judo - Tactical Communication Within the Environmental Health Division, where budgetary Strategies"). constraints have been fewer, employees have also been sent to training conducted by outside firms, such a Public Service Excellence. Finally, RMA just recently sponsored its first agency-wide training by an outside firm ("How to Deliver Exceptional Customer Service“ by Fred Pryor Seminars). Moreover, the standards for customer service are indicated in the agency's employee performance evaluations. Every employee in RMA is rated against the defined standards of "Public Relations". Employees must meet a minimum standard of "Meets Expectations", which denotes that they do an adequate job of assisting customers in terms of both attitude and knowledge of relevant codes/issues. Finally, the Planning Division does not operate the Municipal Advisory Committees (MAC). And to the extent that any division within RMA interacts with the MACs, it is as a forum for public input into the projects, processes and policies of the County, and not as a "customer relations program." Public Opinion forms measuring customer satisfaction are used by all
F03
divisions with the exception of Weights and Measures [Att. 1-3] Concur: Agreed. Efforts are currently underway to implement a program within Weights & Measures to seek and track customer service-related opinions.
F04
The Weights and Measures Division maintains its own method for receiving, logging, and tracking customer complaints. Concur. Agreed. The Agency Director reviews monthly summaries of all Public Opinion
F05
Forms received. Concur. Agreed. There is no performance standard related to customer service for any of
F06
the four divisions having public contact. Service-related complaints re resolved informally (generally over the telephone) by the Building Official, a Division Deputy Director, or a Program Manager. Do Not Concur: This mischaracterizes RMA's customer service standards. As articulated in its Mission Statement, the RMA's service standard is that all customers are to be treated honestly, fairly and efficiently. Thus, every single service complaint is followed-up on and, when validated, the employee in question is appropriately counseled. While most service complaints are handled "informally," where a valid service complaint raises serious issues, it is considered a personnel issue and handled through the formal personnel/ disciplinary process. Also, as noted in the response to F-02 above, the standards for customer service are indicated in the employee performance evaluations for every employee within RMA. There are no RMA appeal processes for service complaints. The
F07
public's only recourse is to appeal to the BOS or file a complaint with the Grand Jury. The inappropriate use of the term "appeal" leads to a Do Not Concur: , • . • . . mischaracterization of the complaint resolution process within RMA. Service complaints are typically handled by the immediate supervisor or manager. Where needed, they are elevated to the Division Director and on occasion to the RMA Director. In the rare instances where the matter is not resolved entirely within RMA, complainants can bring their concerns to the CEO's Office or directly to the Board of Supervisors. In no case are service complaints filed as "appeals" nor are they treated as "appeals"; rather, they are treated as personnel issues and are handled as such. Public telephone customer complaints are not logged.
F08
Agreed. Concur. The RMA Deputy Directors and Program Managers are responsible for
F09
public opinion record keeping in their division. Agreed, but as noted in F-05, the Agency Director also maintains a Concur: log and tracks written complaints and responses. Public Opinion Forms are not pre-numbered or date stamped [Att. 1-3]
F10
Agreed. While Public Opinion Forms are not "date stamped", the Concur: forms do have a place for a date to be entered by the customer. Also, the Public Opinion Forms are collected weekly and dated by the management assistant prior forwarding them on to the division heads. Moreover, each Public Opinion Form is logged by month for reporting purposes. The number of customers visiting each Division is not consistently
F11
tracked. Agree in part. The Planning and Environmental Health Partially Concur: Divisions have sign-in sheets at their public counters which allow tracking of customer visits. However, these represent only a portion of the public contacts made by RMA employees on a daily basis. While workload reviews could be used to estimate all contacts with the public, such a detailed estimate has never been made. Conclusions: C-01: The RMA does not provide staff with customer relations training. (F-01) Response: See response to F-01 above. C-02. The RMA does not have a customer relations program (F-02 through F- 04, F-6, through F-09, F-11, F-12) ٠.٠ ٠. See responses to F-02, F-06 and F-09 above. Response: C-03. The RMA has no performance standards or benchmarks for improving customer relations (F-06 through F-12) Response See response to F06 above. The RMA is unable to determine how many customers complain by C-04. telephone since calls are not log (F-09- F-12) Response: Agreed. Recommendations The RMA should develop and implement a customer relations program

Recommendations 3

Conclusions 2

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.