📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F1
Page 20
The City of Marysville appears to be paying the Contractor an amount for basic services that is “probably $100 too high” by the admission of the Contractor. Based on the further admissions of the Contractor that the excess amounts are really to “go toward the resource costs of website development,” it appears that the City may be paying for the ”resources” identified in the body of the contract as “donated.” Another concern of this Committee is that the terms of the contract require that the Contractor hold a Marysville business license and both the City and the Contractor admit that the Contractor does not have the required license.
F2
Page 20
The residents of the City of Marysville would likely benefit from the opportunity to access more information and /documents from the City ‘s website.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 20To ensure that the City is receiving sufficient value for the monies it is expending, the City needs to amend the contract terms that relate to the payment for basic services to ensure that they are not too high.
-
R2Page 20The City needs to explore resources for updating and expanding the information that it provides through its website. If/when resources are available, the entire agenda packet 2009-2010 Yuba County Grand Jury Final Report