Siskiyou County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

juaw Valley Able of Contents

Published: June 30, 2016 24 pages Consolidated Report
Ver PDF original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F35, F36, F37, F38, F39, F40, F41, F42, F43, F44, F45, F46, F47, F48, F49, F50, F51, F52, F53, F54, F55, F56, F57, F58, F59, F60, F61, F62, F63, F64, F65, F66, F67, F68, F69, F70, F71, F72, F73

Findings 14 findings

F1
Some boards are not aware of or in compliance with and procedures, no written by-laws, small population base AB1234 ethics training. Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, the grand jury to draw upon for prospective board members, changing requests responses as follows: demographics and one or more board members with an
F2
District board vacancies are difficult to fill due to the agenda not in the district’s best interest. absence of a succession plan. INVITED RESPONSES The effective board works together to accomplish the
F3
Training sessions offered by County agencies for the mission adopted by the district. Board responsibilities Board of Supervisors to respond to R1, R3-R7 benefit of district board members are not well attended. include: 1. Determine the district’s basic purpose F4. Training sessions offered by County agencies, the Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals County Clerk, County Counsel, and the Auditor, do not interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand 2. Oversee operations include management functions and responsibilities. Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury. 3. Review and ensure compliance with all applicable
F4
“The Grand Jury found little evidence of City inclusion in the process.” monitoring, regarding the requirement of EDBG loans to Recommendation 13.“City should seek assistance from create local jobs. The public has a right to know how appropriate State CDBG/EDBG departments. Additional effective a major City loan program like the EDBG is on jobs Finding 8.“The Grand Jury found varying opinions from training on program management, loan monitoring, and business revenue.” LC on what their responsibility is, who they work for, who procedures, collateral retrieval, loan modifications and appointed them and what the City expects of them. They delinquent payments would be beneficial. It may be helpful
F5
There appears to be limited coordination among county laws and regulations agencies providing education and training for district board members. 4. Review and correct budget and audit issues APPENDIX 5. Formulate and approve strategic plans F6. The prohibitive cost of financial audits consumes a large portion of some district budgets. Additional sources of information on special districts: 6. Approve major contracts and expenses California Special Districts Association
F6
The prohibitive cost of financial audits consumes a large Formulate and approve strategic plans 5. portion of some district budgets. Additional sources of information on special districts: Approve major contracts and expenses 6. California Districts Association Special
F7
Proposed AB2613 is designed to alleviate some of the 7. Insure board continuity by maintaining minutes http://www.csda.org/ burden regarding financial audit costs for some of the and documentation of board proceedings districts. California Association of Local Agency Formation 8. Ensure there is a written policies and procedures Commission (CALAFCO) http://www.calafco.org/ manual F8. Public meeting requirements, as defined by the Brown Assembly Bill 1234 Act, are not being fully complied with by all of the special 9. Ensure that all employees receive a written districts. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bi performance review annually
F8
“Some staff had not yet had experience in Response 5. The Board of Supervisors Disagrees. “The Finding 1.“Training made the evacuation plan successful.” handling a fire evacuation.” Board of Supervisors is very aware of the impacts of their decision not to charge Special Districts with the annual Costs Finding 2.“All staff should be commended for quick and calm Recommendation 3. “Include all staff such as custodians, Allocation charges to recover costs associated with the CAO, thinking. Staff worked hard to ensure that all children were and cafeteria workers, etc., in the evacuation plan.” Auditor/Controller, County Counsel & Tax safe.” Collector/Treasurer offices. The Board is aware of the Response to Finding 8 and Recommendation 3: “Since limited financial resources of most (if not all) of the Special Finding 3.“Panicking parents are a major concern in the Boles Fire all drills have included all staff including Districts. The Board understands that most Special Districts carrying out any evacuation plan.” cafeteria workers, custodians, and others.” are strictly volunteer based. Also, the Board has voiced their, concern over the large fluctuations in the Cost Allocation Recommendation 1.“The evacuation drill should include “Weed Union Elementary School District appreciates the charges and feel that the Special Districts fragile financial a simulated parent/student pick up. It might be wise to give commendation from the grand jury. Students, parents, staff positions could not absorb such fluctuating costs. Many information to the parents so they know what the procedure and the community have learned from the Boles Fire times these charges have fluctuated by over 100% within one is. If parents know what the school is doing, and why they Experience, and this new knowledge is valuable for year.” are doing it, they may not panic as much.” improving responses in any future emergency situations.” 20— 2015 - 2016 SISKIYOU COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT SISKIYOU CO. CIVIL GRAND JURY RESPONSES TO THE 2014-2015 FINAL REPORT CITY OF WEED ADMINISTRATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG) The 2013-2014 Civil Grand Jury made 13 Findings and creation under the City EDBG loan program. This report Recommendation 8. “Information should be given to
F9
"LC members do not have terms and are not responsible parties are so inquiries can be made. This should required to file conflict of interest forms. Their For additional information see the 2015/2016 Grand Jury avoid confusion that was evident during our visits." responsibility as LC committee members is to deal with CDBG report contained in this document. many individuals and businesses in the City. They should
F10
"LC members do not see or approve LC extensive these issues are within the CDBG/EDBG loan be especially true for non-performing loans. Included in the meeting minutes." program. They should include a review of the obligations guidelines is the responsibility of the borrower to furnish
F11
"City Council needs appropriate orientation projections for the business. The City should follow the
F12
"CDBG/EDBG program appears to lack the outcome of loans they approve. The LC would also
F13
"The City CDBG/EDBG programs need help retrieve collateral on non-performing loans." encourage them to ask questions and request information that with their implementation." would help them in their process. The LC needs better
F74
T Meed Dress siskiyoudaily.com mtshastanews.com 2015 - 2016 SISKIYOU COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT — 23 CITY OF WEED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS The City of Weed participated in this program from 2006 FINDINGS SUMMARY to 2014. They signed a contract with Great Northern F1. The Jury found no evidence that anyone is keeping In 2013-2014 the Civil Grand Jury final report voiced Corporation (GNC) to facilitate loan packaging and track of the status of delinquent CDBG loans. concerns about the way commercial development block servicing, client outreach, job monitoring, attending grant loans were handled by the City of Weed. Because workshops, loan committee liaison, debt collection, F2. Records provided show that there has been no the City of Weed failed to respond to the Grand Jury's concerted effort to collect on CDBG delinquent loans. document updating and facilitation of public hearings as request within the required time limit (as required by needed. When the jury requested a copy of said contract Further, there is no clear delineation of responsibilities for PC933.05), the 2015-2016 Grand Jury chose to do a the City of Weed had to obtain one from Great Northern. CDBG loan maintenance and collection. follow-up investigation on the status of the Commercial The Jury reviewed the contract and found it to be very Development Block Grant program. vague. The Grand Jury was unable to ascertain who was GLOSSARY specifically responsible for monitoring delinquent loans

Recommendations 14