Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Mental Health Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F10, F13, F14, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F29, F34, F36, F37, F39, F41, F50, F52, F53, F54, F55, F56, F57, F58, F61, F62, F63
Findings 52 findings
Recommendations 55
-
R1Page 69adopt a comprehensive statement of policies which govern the program for Proposition A contracting. This statement should be formally amended when 11 necessary and kept up-to-date at all times. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R2Page 69exercise substantially more responsibility and be held accountable for the 11 direction and coordination of the "contracting out" program...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R3Page 69provide to the various department up-to-date written procedures for the "contracting out" process and technical assistance on the various aspects of 11 the program as needed...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R4Page 69undertake a comprehensive reappraisal of existing Proposition A procedures 12 to determine whether existing review steps are still necessary and useful..... 10.00 The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office
-
R5Page 69establish time frames for the review and approval of departmental requests to solicit proposals and award contracts. The Chief Administrative Office should monitor the movement of requests through the process to identify roadblocks 12 and eliminate unnecessary delays................. Andrew Sidesings The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office, with
-
R6Page 70assistance from the Auditor-Controller, issue an updated, comprehensive set 12 of guidelines for conducting cost comparison analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R7Page 70The Grand Jury recommends that the Auditor-Controller be assigned responsibility for central review of all cost comparison analyses to assure that 12 guidelines are followed consistently by all departments............ The Grand Jury recommends that following the reappraisal of existing
-
R8Page 70K. Proposition A contracting procedures, the Chief Administrative Office develop a manual which sets forth all current policies, procedures and guidelines, including cost comparison guidelines. The manual should be issued to all department heads and other appropriate county personnel, then periodically updated as a one-source document on developing Proposition A contracts. . . . 12 89 Spiriting pa Page The Grand Jury recommends that the county's publicly reported claims
-
R9Page 70of dollar savings from Proposition A contracting be corrected and clarified. Among the factors to be considered are that savings data are projections, not actual savings; and that expenses such as monitoring, retraining, and feasibility study costs have not always been included in the calculations because of 13 inconsistent cost comparison practices.................................... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors encourage the implementation of Proposition A contracting so that it encompasses a broader range of job classifications. (This Recommendation was added by the 13 Audit Committee after publication of the McManis report.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R11Page 71The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors establish a program, including possible set-asides, to encourage minority contractors to 14 bid on Proposition A contracts......
-
R12Page 71The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office encourage and experiment with various contracting competition models. Such models should aid in monitoring and evaluating contractor performance, challenge the productivity of county employees providing the same services, 14 and guard against contractor dependency.................................... The Grand Jury recommends that the Chief Administrative Office, with assistance from County Counsel, establish uniform contracting procedures and contractual language for all departments participating in the Proposition A 14 program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the county enact a lobbyist regis-
-
R15Page 71The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors ensure that the Chief Administrative Office has their full support in enforcing compliance with conflict of interest regulations in all contracting activities. Vigorous action in this area will help bolster public confidence in the contracting 15 program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R16Page 71The Grand Jury recommends that the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors add substantially to monies budgeted for essential protective services for abused and neglected children..... 20 90 Page
-
R17Page 71The Grand Jury recommends that audit reports conducted by the Auditor-Controller go through the same Board process as do the audits from MSD. They should be presented to the entire Board of Supervisors at a public session as agency items and the audited department should report back to the Board as to the action it plans to take relative to the recom- 23 mendations..... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors formally establish an audit committee whose responsibility shall be to review all audits and related reports issued by the Management Services Division, the Auditor- Controller, and the Grand Jury; monitor the responses and implementation actions of the audited departments; mediate differences of opinions between 23 the audit agency and the auditee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that the county alter its budgeting policy and allocate to the Management Services Division and the Auditor-Controller each year the funds necessary to conduct all approved management (and other) audits. Provisions should be made for the reimbursement of audit costs 24 from other funding sources, e.g., federal or state, where appropriate...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Management Services Division of the Chief Administrative Office take responsibility to maintain a library of audit reports and disseminate audit information among the various depart- 24 ments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that Los Angeles County provide free preliminary diagnoses of illnesses. A plan for payment could be made when
-
R23Page 72The Grand Jury recommends that the medical records abstract system in Šå 29 the hospitals be under computer capability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R24Page 72The Grand Jury recommends that health facility administrators give closer attention to the staff's need for information regarding anticipated 29 changes.................................... Page
-
R25Page 72The Grand Jury recommends that funding be identified for cost effective, long-range planning programs to include preventive health care. It is projected by futurists that the Los Angeles County area will be the most populous in the United States around the year 2000. Geriatric needs must be met as well as other health care phenomena which must be included in projected 29 planning.....
-
R26Page 73The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the support program presented by the County Solid Waste Management Committee and immediately allocate funds to insure its execution. . . . . . . . 32
-
R27Page 73The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors direct the CoSWMP Committee's support program to address the issue of coordinating efforts for the siting and permitting of landfills...... 32
-
R28Page 73The Grand Jury recommends that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office and all law enforcement agencies within the County make complaint forms available to the public at accessible locations in city halls and public libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that law enforcement agencies' internal investigations units report directly to the Chief Executive in order to insure optimum monitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
-
R30Page 74The Grand Jury recommends to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office and all law enforcement agencies within the county that allegations of misconduct by police officers be investigated by personnel other than the officers' immediate superiors in order to insure optimum objectivity...... 37
-
R31Page 74The Grand Jury recommends that all law enforcement agencies within the county provide psychological counseling services to all officers involved in the use of force and/or firearms resulting in death or serious injury...... 37
-
R32Page 74The Grand Jury recommends that the county continue to seek reform of State Workers' Compensation legislation in order to combat rising costs and to help identify and eliminate loopholes that could permit abuses in Workers' Compensation benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
-
R33Page 74The Grand Jury recommends that fiscal investigations of incorporated cities under the authority of Penal Code section 925a be vigorously pursued by future grand juries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 92 Page The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors pursue passage of SB 924 so that the authority for investigations of incorporated cities can be 41 Sept. expanded to include watchdog functions...........
-
R35Page 74The Grand Jury recommends that 1983-84 and future grand juries place more emphasis on investigating fiscal mismanagement within cities of the 43 county...... The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors initiate
-
R38Page 74The Grand Jury recommends continued efforts toward reducing such delays consistent with the protection of the rights of the accused. This would 45 prove significantly beneficial in cost savings to the courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that officer-involved cases of citizen death or great bodily injury in which the legality of officer conduct is not clearly established by the District Attorney's investigation be referred to the Grand 46 Jury for investigative hearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R40Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that an electronic scanning system be installed on each level of cell rows and day rooms in Central Jail to monitor inmate activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that four additional keep-away cells be
-
R42Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that the freight elevator at Central jail be given a thorough and regularly scheduled cleaning, including steam cleaning, 48 wire brushing, and deodorizing.....
-
R43Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that the 1983-84 Grand Jury monitor the 8.8 implementation of these alterations to the buses in future jail inspections..... 49
-
R44Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that the conditions at Harbor, Hollywood, and Southeast Division facilities of the City of Los Angeles be corrected 49 immediately.................................... Page
-
R45Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that the Huntington Park and Maywood jails employ extermination services for eradication of cockroaches and other vermin. A general cleaning is necessary for walls, floors and showers. A second visit was made to these jails and it was found that improvements had not been made even though unsanitary conditions had been pointed out to jail personnel on 49 the first visit.....
-
R46Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that a prisoner unloading enclosure be provided, abutting the south side of the Santa Monica Courthouse to ensure full security for this procedure. Metal roll-up gates at east and west extremities 49 of the enclosure should be included.....
-
R47Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that electronic monitoring scanners be installed so that all holding tanks may be viewed individually from a central 50 station. Wooden doors of holding tanks should be replaced by metal doors.....
-
R48Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that county officials endorse a recycling 52 policy and encourage other cities in the county to initiate recycling programs...
-
R49Page 75The Grand Jury recommends that a basic condition for issuance of opera- ting permits for new landfill sites, as well as those currently in operation, be the installation of a gas recovery system to be operated under specified rules and 52 regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that county officials encourage state legis- lation which continues subsidizing homeowners and others who use non- polluting solar energy..... 53
-
R51Page 76The Grand Jury recommends serious consideration be given again to reviving operations at Toyon Canyon and Calabassas by the City and County of Los Angeles as a joint effort in this growing crisis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that an extension of time be permitted for the continued operation and expansion of the Puente Hills facility. Suspension of this area would place the county in an extremely critical position as a result of shortage of landfill disposal capacity..... The Grand Jury recommends that the licensing of BKK West Covina be continued since this is the only Class I landfill available for use in this Southern California area. Closure of this operation would have a serious impact on the disposal of hazardous and toxic materials....... 54 94 Page The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors insist that
-
R54Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INSIST THAT DEPARTMENTS 95 AND 95A BE RELOCATED TO A MORE SUITABLE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WHERE HUMANE TREATMENT AND SURROUNDINGS CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR BOTH THE MENTAL PATIENTS, THEIR FAMILIES, THE PETIT JURORS, AND THE STAFF WHO MUST ATTEND THEM.
-
R55Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE FACILITY AT 1150 NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD BE RENOVATED IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE EARLIER RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 1981-82 GRAND JURY. DRINKING DRIVERS PROGRAM PURPOSE As a result of requests by a county supervisor and others, the Health Committee examined the procedures and practices employed in issuance of contracts per Assembly Bill 541, Drinking Driver Programs for first offenders. We were asked to examine the monitoring of these programs to ascertain whether they are effective and produce the desired results.
-
R56Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CONTRACTS FOR FIRST OFFENDER PROGRAMS (AB 541) MUST INCLUDE UNIFORMITY IN THE FOLLOWING: FEE SCHEDULES; . TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR STAFF OPERATING THE REHABILI- . TATION PROGRAMS; PROGRAMMATIC REPORTING; • FREQUENCY OF MONITORING; • OBJECTIVES AND GOALS. .
-
R57Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: MANAGE AND MONITOR THE CONTRACTS; • SET STANDARDS FOR CONTRACT PERFORMANCE: . ESTABLISH AN APPEAL PROCESS FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS; • PURSUE ALL BREACH OF CONTRACTS. .
-
R58Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT HEALTH DEPARTMENT INVESTI- GATORS BE ASSIGNED AT EACH OF THE TRAFFIC COURTS IN THE COUNTY TO INSURE UNIFORMITY IN REFERRALS AND COURT MONITORING PROCEDURES.
-
R59Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT DEVISE AND MONITOR A FISCAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WHICH PROVIDES THE COUNTY ITS FULL REIMBURSEMENT.
-
R60Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLETHORA OF INVOLVED ADVISORS AND/OR COMMISSIONS BE COORDINATED TO SPEAK THROUGH ONE VOICE TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE OAAA.
-
R61Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT BECOME INVOLVED IN THE REHABILITATION ASPECTS OF THE DRINKING DRIVER PROGRAM. Juanita Dudley, Chair Helene Eller Jennie Kerr Patricia Lofland Eduardo Valdiviez 62 SOCIAL SERVICE COMMITTEE PURPOSE In response to a growing public concern for abused and neglected children, the 1982-83 Grand Jury selected child abuse as a major issue for review. From the Social Services report of the major issues, the committee extracted the service delivery system for a special study. AREA OF REVIEW The agency in Los Angeles County responsible for the administration of the child abuse program is the Department of Public Social Services. Within the department, the Bureau of Social Services has the direct responsibility to deliver services to families with problems of child abuse. The Bureau operatives are called Children's Services Workers. This report deals solely with problems involved in the delivery of services. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The committee reviewed and analyzed current information and departmental literature in the following areas: The Department of Public Social Services (redesign and fact sheet) • Interagency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect (ICAN) Public Social Services Commission • Committee members visited Dependency Court hearings, MacLaren Hall, the Department of Public Social Services, and Cedar House. Interviews were held with judges, judicial review assistants, Children's Services Workers, and administrators in the Department of Public Social Services.
-
R62Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT ALL LINE STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES BE ASSIGNED TO THE BUREAU OF SOCIAL SERVICES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND TO EXPEDITE THE PROCESSING OF CASES.
-
R63Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE NEW REDESIGN ASSESSMENT SCALE BE BROADENED TO INCLUDE CASES OF CHILD ENDANGERMENT, AS WELL AS LIFE-THREATENING CASES.
-
R64Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT FUNDS BE DESIGNATED TO INCREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES WORKERS AND COMMENSURATE SUPPORT STAFF TO INCREASE THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF SERVICES PROVIDED. Judith Richardson, Chair Juan Godoy 58 Maycie Herrington Roberta Reddick Lidia Roth 65 HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY THE MUSIC AND PERFORMING ARTS COMMISSION: THE MUSIC CENTER OPERATING COMPANY; THE PERFORMING ARTS COUNCIL OF THE MUSIC CENTER THE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY PURPOSE The County Library, with its 70 years of impressive history, has not been audited by the Grand Jury in recent years. We decided to conduct a partial review of the library services in meeting educational, recreational, and informational needs of the people in our county. We also reviewed various cost-effective measures taken by the library in order to maintain and improve its high standard of services and productivity. AREAS OF REVIEW Overview Sources of Financial Support Library Services Children's Services Cost Effective Measures Community Support METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The committee as a team conducted interviews with the county librarian and heads of several departments, inspected large regional libraries and the smaller community libraries, and reviewed relevant documents from the library administration and community libraries. 66
-
R65Page 77The Grand Jury recommends that capital funds be provided for new libraries to be constructed in high population growth areas to meet the edu- 67 cational and cultural needs of residents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
R66Page 77The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize a study of the salary scale among higher level employees of other county depart- ments and compare the findings with the salaries paid to comparable employees in the library system. Remuneration for library staff should be competitive in 67 order to secure and maintain well-trained personnel...............
-
R67Page 77The Grand Jury recommends that the library show the films under the sponsorship of Friends of the Library groups so that donations can be solicited 68 for the purpose of supporting library services..... The Grand Jury recommends the appointment of more children's librarians in the Los Angeles County library system so that our children can be better 70 serve in meeting their educational and recreational needs..........
-
R69Page 77The Grand Jury recommends that a work measurement study be made by library management to ascertain ways to improve productivity of library personnel..... The Grand Jury recommends that a division for community relations be established in an effort to create public awareness of library services and 71 citizens' responsibility for supporting the library system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that a letter of commendation be sent to Helen Kennedy for her 22 years of outstanding leadership and her dedicated service as a member and president of the Music and Performing Arts Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Grand Jury recommends that funding be allocated to develop a volunteer program. This is especially needed in the areas of publicity, pro- motion and fund raising from the private sector................. The Grand Jury recommends that sufficient free parking area be
-
R74Page 65THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE 1983-84 GRAND JURY MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CONTRACTING OUT POLICY AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES. Department of Purchasing and Stores The charter for Los Angeles County gives the Purchasing Agent exclusive legal responsibility for the purchase of all equipment and supplies. In addition, he supervises 290,000 square feet of warehouse with an inventory of $6 to $7 million. There is a high degree of public interest in department responsibility for large expenditures of govern- 8.8 ment money. Purchasing and Stores has been the object of a great many audits. Grand juries alone have conducted either full or partial audits in eight out of the last ten years. The implementation of audit recommendations is a vital part of an audit. In our review of the 1981-82 Grand Jury audit, the committee did not find adequate justification to support the Purchasing Agent's decision not to implement some of the recommendations. For example, several recommendations of the 1981-82 Grand Jury audit were concerned with the conflict of interest exposure that exists among employees. This Grand Jury concludes that the guidelines for employees remain vaguely defined. The Purchasing Agent has indicated an intention to revise the guidelines and expand disclosure forms in the Personnel Policy Manual.
-
R75Page 66THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE 1983-84 GRAND JURY PURSUE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISION OF THE PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASING AND STORES. Office of Public Administrator-Public Guardian The 1981-82 Grand Jury completed an audit of this department and made 19 recommendations. At the Grand Jury's specific request, the Continuity Committee called for a written status report which was received March 8, 1983. The department has made positive progress on the implementation of all the recommendations within its statutory authority. Of those, some are in their initial stages. For example, the hiring of a full-time procedure writer will facilitate compliance with several other recommendations. This department was contracting out services before the enactment of Proposition A. Credit is due the department for the follow-through on all contracts programs. We specifically took note of the procedures developed to monitor existing drayage and cleanup contracts. In addition, the department expects help from an audit the Chief Administrative Office was to complete in April of 1983 in the area of working standards.
-
R76Page 66THE GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, UPON COMPLETION OF ITS CURRENT AUDIT, MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALL EXISTING AUDITS BEFORE AUTHORIZING NEW AUDITS. Department of Adoptions This Grand Jury accepts the responses of the Department of Adoptions to the recommendations of the 1981-82 Grand Jury as follows: The response indicated a top-heavy administrative condition — staff reductions have been achieved and there will be further reductions through attrition. The department does not agree with the finding that management tools are inadequate — the bimonthly tracking reports serve for review purposes. The department was specifically charged with finding 86 adoptive homes for children who, because of age, ethnic background, handicaps, both physical and emotional, are hard to place — the department continues to focus on those areas. One recommendation of the 1981-82 Grand Jury stated, "It may become apparent that the courts should be asked to assume responsibility for investigative work, while the Department (of Adoptions) would continue to provide services." The present Grand Jury 1 believes that the 1981-82 contract auditor might not have understood the primary responsibility of the Department of Adoptions in that area. Prior to 1967, stepparent adoptions, including investigative work, were handled by the Los Angeles County Probation Department. Subsequently, the Board of Supervisors requested the County Department of Adoptions to assume that investigative function. It is the opinion of this Grand Jury that the investigative function should remain within the department and not become a function of the court. This Grand Jury concluded that the Department of Adoptions was very responsive to our SESSONIA CONTRACTOR inquiry. Furthermore, it has demonstrated a cooperative effort toward the Department of Public Social Services which should resolve most of the past problems. Sheriff-Marshal Consolidation Grand Jury records dating back to 1967 address the wasteful duplication of costs for the court-related services of the Sheriff and the Marshal. A majority of the electorate approved the consolidation concept in 1980. In 1982, a bill to merge Sheriff-Marshal services (AB 2784, Katz), was allowed to die in the inactive file of the California State Legislature. Recently, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors decided that the County will sponsor the following legislative proposal: "Authorize the Board of Supervisors of each county to consolidate the court-related services provided by the Marshal's Office and the Sheriff's Office." According to an analysis submitted by the Chief Administrative Office, the source of this proposal was the 1981-82 Grand Jury. This Grand Jury believes the Legislature must address the issue of vesting locally elected officials with the power to make managerial decisions about services they are required to fund out of local revenues. The duplication of services within the Sheriff and the 12 Marshal's Departments is certainly such a managerial decision.
-
R77Page 67THE GRAND JURY COMMENDS THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR ITS LEGISLATIVE POSITION AND RECOMMENDS THAT IT DILIGENTLY PURSUE THE PROPOSAL OF THE 1981-82 GRAND JURY. Senior Citizens Affairs — Adult Day Care Facilities for senior citizens continue to be of concern to the Social Services Committee. In 1978, the California Adult Day Health Care Program was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. It is a community based, daytime program for people aged 55 or over designed to provide therapeutic, social and health activities. It offers services which allow elderly persons to maintain maximum independence. In 1980, a 15-member Los Angeles County Planning Council was established. It is responsible for developing a county plan for adult day care which implements state guidelines. The council reviews all license applications for Los Angeles County programs. The State Department of Health Services then reviews and approves the council's recommendations for establishing community centers. The State Department of Health Services is required to report to the Legislature the progress and success of Adult Day Health Care programs to the Legislature. The Social Services Committee met with the chairman of the Los Angeles Planning Council. The committee learned there is no money available to continue developing new centers. The council had hoped to build 300 by 1985 and had established a need for 1,000. There are only 12 centers in the entire state; one is in operation in Pomona and one in East Los Angeles. Medi-Cal reimburses the Adult Day Health Care program. The daily $23 per person allocated will not generate enough funds to allow operations to continue. In the current economic climate, worthy operations like these community care centers are often left short of funds. The committee believes the program is important for our senior citizens and should receive thoughtful consideration as funding becomes available. CONCLUSIONS One of the greatest attributes of a grand jury is that the members represent a cross-section of public opinion of an entire county. Time and again, the same issues appear in grand jury reports and audits, indicating the concerns which have come to be of widespread importance. Often it is the repetitive examination of a single subject that promotes its ultimate acceptance. This Grand Jury believes that the power of continuity to ensure lasting change can be used to the advantage of grand juries in the future. Jean Hitchcock, Chair Editorial and Continuity Committee 88 INDEX OF RECOMMENDATIONS Page The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors formally