Maintenance Budgeting and Accounting Challenges for General Fund Departments: Responses to Cgj Findings Cgj Report

Published: December 07, 2016 40 pages

Ver PDF original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and recommendations have not been extracted yet.

The full report content may still be accessible via the PDF link above.

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben Rosenfield

October 03, 2016 • 3 pages • 1 response • Score: -1 (+0, 0, -1) View Details ▾

PDF

1 response to findings and recommendations

Recommends that SFPD, in collaboration with CIT Working Group, identify both quantitative and qualitative standards to help measure CIT operational effectiveness. Newly adopted standards should include Crisis Response (CR) incidents and jail diversion statistics. These standards should be part of the CIT annual report to the Police Commission. Standards should be adopted no later than January 1, 2019 and be set for inclusion in the 2018 CIT annual report to the Police Commission. (F3)

Response: Will Not Implement

Score: -1

r 3, 2016 The Honorable John K. Stewart Presiding Judge Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 400 McAllister Street, Room 008 San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Citizens' General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee's (CGOBOC) response to the 2015-16 Civil Grand Jury Report entitled "Maintenance Budgeting and Accounting Challenges for General Fund Departments" Dear Judge Stewart: Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933 and 933.05, the Office of the Controller is transmitting this letter on behalf of the Citizens' General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee (CGOBOC) in response to the recomm...

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben Rosenfield

August 26, 2016 • 17 pages • 2 responses View Details ▾

PDF

2 responses to findings and recommendations

Response: Unknown

Score: 0

Recommendation 3(b) and include a line item entry for those implemented because it is not b. Accounting costs in his budget requests for fiscal yea

Recommends that an academic institutional partner be assigned to assess and periodically review the efficacy of the 40 and 10 hour CIT Training courses. (F9)

Response: Unknown

Score: 0

r 9OLLERS Todd Rydstrom Deputy Controller August 26, 2016 The Honorable John K. Stewart Presiding Judge Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 400 McAllister Street, Room 008 San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Controller's Office response to the 2015-16 Civil Grand Jury Report entitled "Maintenance Budgeting and Accounting Challenges for General Fund Departments" Dear Judge Stewart: Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933 and 933.05, this letter transmits the Office of the Controller's responses to the recommendations in the 2015-16 San Francisco Civil Grand Jury report, Maintenance Budgeti...