Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
16. the EL Paso DE Robles Youth Correctional Facility
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16
Findings 4 findings
Recommendations 9
-
R1Page 251– A portion of the “bed tax” from Avila Disagree. hotels should be shared with Harbor District. District has potential to increase funding through revenue sources currently under its control but bed tax is used for county wide services.
-
R2Page 251– County should take responsibility for Not implemented, not warranted. – designing, providing and maintaining a solution to flooding Want to form a zone of benefit to fund appropriate flood problems at the drainage ditch. control.
-
R3Page 251– County should do regular mosquito County Environmental Health does provide mosquito control. abatement in and around the drainage ditch.
-
R4Page 251– Drainage ditch should be fenced with Agree. restricted access to insure safety. SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLEET GARAGE 2005/2006 Grand Jury Recommendation Agency Response
-
R5Page 252– Adhere to recommendation from No response. Agriculture Commission when planning new school locations.
-
R6Page 252– Task Force on Health and Pesticide Use Not agree. should meet annually.
-
R7Page 252– Local citizens should work to protect school No response. sites and surrounding residents from future contamination. 2006-2007 San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury Final Report: Page R-2 THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION 2005/2006 Grand Jury Recommendation Agency Response
-
R8Page 255– District should re-evaluate the need for Agree. Camera surveillance has been installed. additional security at AHS and other campuses. 2006-2007 San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury Final Report: Page R-5 COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 2005/2006 Grand Jury Recommendation Agency Response
-
R18Page 221JUVENILE HALL – JUVENILE SERVICES CENTER ORIGIN On November 14, 2006, members of the San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury toured Juvenile Hall ("the Hall") as part of its mandate to review prison facilities in the county (§919(b) California Penal Code). METHOD Information for this report was gathered in the following ways: • Visit to and tour of the Juvenile Services Center and Juvenile Hall; • Interviews/conversations with the Chief Probation Officer, Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of Juvenile Hall, the on-duty nurse, Juvenile Services Officers, a cook, various other staff, minors detained in the facility, and the Supervising Juvenile Judge; • Review of the County of San Luis Obispo Probation Department web site (www.slocounty.ca.gov/PR) including the "Juvenile Hall Handbook." NARRATIVE