📋

Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Tulare County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

articleCause and Effect*

Published: July 06, 2015 4 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 6 findings

The complainant was on PRCS at the time of the incident.

The complainant was classified as a high-risk, chronic drug user and was not drug tested when taken into custody.

Reasonable cause was present when complainant was stopped, searched and detained by law enforcement.

For individuals on PRCS and homeless, a new policy was implemented by the Tulare County Probation Office requiring GPS monitoring.

The Officer used the TASER within the guidelines of the Tulare Police Department policy.

The complainant's allegations against the Tulare Police Department were not substantiated.

Recommendations 2

R1

The Tulare County Probation Office complies with the court mandated order for drug testing and the use of drugs.
R2

The Tulare County Probation Office not deviate from its drug testing policy. REQUIRED RESPONSES: 1. Tulare County Probation Office

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.