Sacramento County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
• Agency Response
Sacramento Fire Department*
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
Page 1
"The Fire Department's implementation of new computerized systems to replace manual inventory and tracking systems will greatly increase the accuracy and timeliness of information related to the purchase, storage, distribution and use of narcotics." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 1
"The City of Sacramento Fire Department should continue implementing the City Auditor's recommendations." Response to
F2
Page 1
"The Department's implementation of coded access by authorized personnel provides better assurance that narcotics are only accessed by those with the proper and unique access codes, as referenced by the City Auditor's report." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 2
"The City Auditor should conduct a follow-up audit to determine the adequacy of the Fire Department's implementation and operation of the systems, policies, and procedures required to properly manage narcotics under the Department's control." Response to
F3
Page 1
"No evidence was discovered to indicate drug theft or tampering." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 2
"In consultation with the City Attorney, the Fire Department should diligently pursue discussions with firefighter union representatives to institute a random drug testing program." Response to
F4
Page 1
"The Department's publically stated willingness to consider random drug testing, as stated in the City Auditor's report, is recognition of a proven program to create a safer work environment for fire personnel and to ensure better patient care." Response to
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.