📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 9 findings
F1
in the department or city. Plan to Plan
F2
Determine: - What it is you are going to plan Who has responsibility for designing and implementing planning process Who has responsibility for driving the planning process Who is to do planning (select planning team) Clarify planning roles Mechanisms for gathering data/inputs in planning process How long planning process will take Who will review and approve plans Who will establish implementation plans, responsibilities, and ---- accountabilities Who will measure progress and evaluate results Perform an Assessment of Needs
F3
Examine major internal values 0 City council members Managers/staff (both line and staff) Examine organizational values 8 Formulate department, city or organizational mission statement
F4
Perform environmental analysis
F5
Determine external interests State of California State and Regional Agencies Los Angeles County Southern California Association of Governments Local government and civic leaders Chamber of Commerce and local businesses 145
F6
Determine components Identify critical issues, goals and objectives to achieve goals Perform strategic analysis of critical issues, goals and objectives Perform strategy formulation Develop long term objectives ---
F7
Present draft of plan to the approval process (may consist of multiple levels) Review draft • Input from interested parties on recommendations ۰ Approve plan 8 Publish plan Perform Implementation
F8
Identify and allocate resources Establish timetables Develop operating plans and budgets Review and approve Implement Measure and report progress •
F9
Conduct annual review of plan 146 $2000 com
Recommendations 8
-
R1The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors work with the Southern California Association of Governments to establish clear definitions with cities on the differences between strategic planning and the requisite General Plan. A common and clear definition between strategic planning and the General Plan will cause more cities to perform strategic planning. In turn, this will cause more cities to identify regional issues and thus consider more cooperative planning efforts and solutions.
-
R2The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors assume a more visible role in identifying regional issues and assisting the Southern California Association of Governments and cities in obtaining information on regional issues which must be addressed. Cities alone may not have sufficient information to determine regional needs and requirements. Although the County cannot dictate requirements to cities, it is in a position to obtain more and better information. Where feasible, the Board of Supervisors should help the Southern California Association of Governments identify regional issues and the cities involved which need to establish cooperative efforts. Once cities are provided Special production of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the C the information on issues and the potential impact, there is a greater likelihood that cooperative planning efforts will be established.
-
R3The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors directs each Los Angeles County department to continue its efforts to incorporate strategic planning into their planning efforts. As their strategic plans are completed, Richard Constanting future grand juries will benefit from departments' presentations. The Grand Jury further recommends that the Board of Supervisors maintain a high level of visibility in the planning process and encourage all departments pursue this SERVING CONTRACTOR effort.
-
R4The Grand Jury recommends that the County Chief Administrative Officer 数のでいったがある 動物をあるのである continue efforts to establish a strategic plan for Los Angeles County departments. The Grand Jury further recommends that the County Chief Administrative Office's strategic plan be evaluated by future grand juries.
-
R5The Grand Jury recommends to the Board of Supervisors that a management review of the Pay for Performance Plan be conducted at an appropriate time. Since the process is relatively new to Los Angeles County departments, an 100 adequate baseline of data for evaluation does not yet exist. 10.00
-
R6The Grand Jury recommends that succeeding Los Angeles County grand juries select committees to meet with committees of grand juries of adjacent counties to improve regional strategic planning efforts. In this connection, the Los Angeles County Grand Jury should lead in improving the coordination in strategic regional planning efforts. II. STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR THE REGION PURPOSE Determine what each grand jury in the Los Angeles region can do to develop strategies to achieve a shared vision of the future in the year 2000 and beyond. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION We met with regional agencies.
-
R8Identify and allocate resources Establish timetables Develop operating plans and budgets Review and approve Implement Measure and report progress •
-
R9Conduct annual review of plan 146 $2000 com