📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
Los Angeles County Grand Jury
• 2013-2014
First 5 LA Serving the Community?
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 8 findings
F1
Page 187
In 2009, First 5 LA adopted a five-year Strategic Plan that called for making significant investments in a Place-Based Strategy. The new plan called for discontinuing funding of initiative-based direct services on a countywide basis and to concentrate funding to targeted communities with the goal of making a greater impact with the Agency’s investments.
F2
Page 187
The Implementation Plan called for spending $405 to $540 million over five years, or an average of $81 to $108 million per year on Place-Based activities in 14 high needs communities. $270 to $405 million per year were also allocated to Countywide Strategies, aimed at improving policies and services for children ages 0–5 in the 14 communities and beyond.
F3
Page 187
The budgeted amount for both Place-Based activities and Countywide Strategies for the three years ending in FY 2012-13 was $158 million, but actual expenditures were significantly below that amount, at $61.4 million, or only 39 percent of the amount budgeted.
F4
Page 187
Most of the $61.4 million in actual expenditures went towards funding Countywide Strategies policy and advocacy work; the amount expended on Place-Based activities in the 14 communities was only $14.6 million over the three years ending in FY 2012-13, significantly lower than the $65.1 million budgeted for activities in the 14 communities during those three years.
F5
Page 187
The new Strategic Plan included a roadmap for ending support to Prior Strategic Initiatives grants. The Agency has not implemented this component of the Plan and continues to fund several of these grantees. In addition, the Agency adopted other 156 2013-2014 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT FIRST 5 LA SERVING THE COMMUNITY? Countywide Initiatives in 2010. Spending on these two categories of grants has greatly exceeded spending on Strategic Plan components as a percentage of annual expenditures.
F6
Page 188
During the Agency’s “pause” on Place-Based Strategy funding in FY 2012-13, it appears that the right questions were raised, as to the core results to be achieved for families and communities. It took First 5 LA several years after implementation of the Place-Based Strategy to ask these questions and to develop quantitative metrics to monitor impact suggests insufficient planning for the new strategy. It contributed to a loss of momentum in activities for the newly formed Community Partnerships in the 14 designated communities.
F7
Page 188
The Agency’s own inquiry into implementation of the Place- Based Strategy, known as the Listening, Learning, Leading (L3) effort, concluded that the Strategic Plan was not being used as a guide to Agency funding and that new performance measures needed to be adopted. The Agency has adopted new performance measures after three years of minimal assessment of outcomes for its Place-Based Initiatives but the new measures have yet to be reported on. These measures do not cover the Countywide Initiatives that still comprise the bulk of what First 5 LA is funding.
F8
Page 163
While this audit was underway, the First 5 LA Commission adopted new Governance Guidelines that call for new programs and initiatives to be aligned with the Agency’s strategic plans, to have implementation timelines and to have specific outcomes and performance measures. If followed, all of these guidelines should help the Agency avoid some of the problems encountered in rolling out its Place-Based Strategy.
Recommendations 7
-
R1Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department review Executive Directive No. 9 for all sections applicable to LAPD and implement policies and procedures designed to bring the Department into compliance with the Mayor’s directive.
-
R2Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department implement the Employee Mediation Program to reduce the number of employee-related lawsuits proceeding to settlement or trial. The program, developed by the OIG in consultation with the Department, the City Attorney’s Office and the Los Angeles Police Protective League, will provide a mechanism for the development of internal remedies for employee grievances, where appropriate.
-
R3Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department and the City Attorney’s Office conduct formal case reviews whenever a case has a scheduled settlement conference or trial approaching. In order to quickly identify those cases suitable for settlement, the formal review should require the parties to discuss the facts of the case, all claims and defenses, the City’s potential financial exposure and the attorney’s valuation of the case for settlement.
-
R4Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department create a document retention plan specifically for the litigation files and related notes for each employment-related case.
-
R5Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department implement a system to ensure that the significant information for each lawsuit is timely and accurately entered into the appropriate fields within the Claim/Lawsuit Information System or a comparable database.
-
R6Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department evaluate all employment-related complaints, regardless of outcome, to identify possible areas for improvement and then provide managers the targeted training necessary to implement those improvements.
-
R7Page 150The OIG recommends that the Department review with the City Attorney’s Office the facts and circumstances for each lawsuit where there is a settlement or verdict adverse to the City to determine the specific issues that created the liability or litigation risk. Furthermore, the OIG recommends that training is developed to address the “lessons learned” in each case and that such training is disseminated to Department staff members in a relevant manner with a goal of preventing similar future behavior. 135 2013-2014 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT Employment Litigation Audit EXHIBIT A Data Completion Rates of 30 CLIS Data Fields Tested (sorted from lowest to highest completion rate) %(cid:3) (cid:3)(cid:3) Data(cid:3)Field(cid:3) Complete 1(cid:3) Incident(cid:3)Time(cid:3) 0 2(cid:3) Date(cid:3)Claim(cid:3)Concluded(cid:3) 7 3(cid:3) Final(cid:3)Cause(cid:3)of(cid:3)Action(cid:3) 15 4(cid:3) Incident(cid:3)Date(cid:3) 19 5(cid:3) Claim(cid:3)No.(cid:3) 26 6(cid:3) Date(cid:3)Claim(cid:3)Filed(cid:3) 30 7(cid:3) Location(cid:3)of(cid:3)Occurrence(cid:3) 33 8(cid:3) Area(cid:3)of(cid:3)Occurrence(cid:3) 37 9(cid:3) Verdict(cid:3)Status(cid:3) 37 10(cid:3) Verdict(cid:3)for:(cid:3) 41 11(cid:3) Trial(cid:3)Date(cid:3) 44 12(cid:3) Appeal(cid:3) 60 13(cid:3) Supervisor(cid:3)Review(cid:3) 63 14(cid:3) Complaint(cid:3)No.(cid:3) 70 15(cid:3) Date(cid:3)Lawsuit(cid:3)Concluded(cid:3) 74 16(cid:3) Payouts(cid:3)Completed(cid:3) 85 17(cid:3) LAD(cid:3)Investigator(cid:3) 93 18(cid:3) City(cid:3)Attorney(cid:3) 93 19(cid:3) Case(cid:3)Status(cid:3) 96 20(cid:3) Date(cid:3)IAG(cid:3)Response(cid:3) 96 21(cid:3) Date(cid:3)of(cid:3)Report(cid:3) 100 22(cid:3) Claim/Case(cid:3)Name(cid:3) 100 23(cid:3) Type(cid:3)of(cid:3)Case(cid:3) 100 24(cid:3) Jurisdiction(cid:3)Court(cid:3) 100 25(cid:3) Case(cid:3)No.(cid:3) 100 26(cid:3) Date(cid:3)Lawsuit(cid:3)Filed(cid:3) 100 27(cid:3) Plaintiff(cid:3)Attorney(cid:3) 100 28(cid:3) Initial(cid:3)Cause(cid:3)of(cid:3)Action(cid:3) 100 29(cid:3) Involved(cid:3)Persons(cid:3)Listed(cid:3) 100 30(cid:3) Complaint(cid:3)to(cid:3)IAG(cid:3) 100 136 2013-2014 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT FIRST 5 LA SERVING THE COMMUNITY? Alicia F. Thompson Chairperson Robert J. Taub Co-Chairperson Jeffery N. Wallace Secretary Henry Buffett Nancy M. Coleman FIRST 5 LA SERVING THE COMMUNITY? FIRST 5 LA SERVING THE COMMUNITY? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2013-2014 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) conducted an audit to discern the effectiveness of the 2009-2015 Strategic Plan adopted by First 5 Los Angeles (First 5 LA). The new direction outlined a complete shift away from First 5 LA’s traditional role as a grant- awarding agency that provided funding to organizations that served the needs of children from ages 0-5 years, throughout Los Angeles County. Of primary concern to the CGJ is First 5 LA’s (Agency) excessive existing fund balance as a result of a suspension of providing services during the “re-tooling” of its Strategic Plan, and the untimeliness of full implementation. As an example, for fiscal years 2010-11 and 2012-13, the Agency budgeted $61.5 million for Place-Based activities during the three year period, but only spent $14.6 million during that time, or 23.7 percent of the budgeted amount.