📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

First 5 LA Serving the Community?

42 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 16 findings

F1 Page 187
In 2009, First 5 LA adopted a five-year Strategic Plan that called for making significant investments in a Place-Based Strategy. The new plan called for discontinuing funding of initiative-based
F2 Page 187
The Implementation Plan called for spending $405 to $540
F3 Page 187
The budgeted amount for both Place-Based activities and
F4 Page 187
Most of the $61.4 million in actual expenditures went towards
F5 Page 187
The new Strategic Plan included a roadmap for ending support to Prior Strategic Initiatives grants. The Agency has not
F6 Page 188
During the Agency’s “pause” on Place-Based Strategy funding in FY 2012-13, it appears that the right questions were raised, as to the core results to be achieved for families and communities. It took First 5 LA several years after implementation of the
F7 Page 188
The Agency’s own inquiry into implementation of the Place-
F8 Page 163
While this audit was underway, the First 5 LA Commission
F9 Page 165
The categories used to describe the Place-Based components in
F10 Page 165
In Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14, all budget line items for the Place-Based Strategy were collapsed into a single line item
F11 Page 165
Place-Based Strategy budget and actual expenditure information for all years reviewed do not represent Agency operating budget
F12 Page 200
Budget and actual expenditure documents presented to the
F13 Page 200
Not until FY 2012-13 did budget documents provide a greater
F14 Page 207
The Agency provided insufficient evidence to the Commission about the potential effectiveness of and challenges inherent in the Place-Based Strategy and its ability to improve services for children aged 0-5. It cited the work of private foundations, which may not be an appropriate comparison for an agency that receives public funds.
F15 Page 207
Documents presented to the Commission prior to the adoption of the Place-Based Strategy did not adequately list the potential impacts involved, including the extended period of time for results to materialize.
F16 Page 207
Implementation of the Place-Based Strategy and the Community Capacity Building work in particular, is time-consuming and challenging. It is difficult to measure the effectiveness of the Community Partnerships and their ability to improve services. Some Community Partnership representatives have expressed frustration at the slow pace of development and their concern that the implementation plans will not be funded once completed.

Recommendations 10