📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Nevada County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

Body Worn Cameras issued by the 2015-2016 Jury (2015-2016 Report) and inquired into

Published: May 19, 2017 6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6, F7

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
Body Worn Cameras have been shown to improve officer-to-citizen interactions and safety.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Body Worn Cameras have been shown to reduce citizen complaints.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Body Worn Cameras provide more clarification of contested incidents between officer and civilian.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Body Worn Cameras appear to provide some measure of crowd control and mitigation.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Body Worn Cameras reduce time and legal expense in investigating complaints against officers.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
The Nevada County Sheriff's Office has expressed a desire not to deploy Body Worn Cameras at this time.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
lnteragency communication concerning Body Worn Camera deployment, techniques, policies, and operating procedures has been shown to improve overall results. Response to Findings F1 through F9 by the NCSO The NCSO agreed with all nine of the above findings.
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 1