Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
• Agency Response
Response to:
Consolidated Final Report
Meeting Mendocino County’s Needs For Housing Requires Coordination
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
The areas around cities have the best developed sewer and water systems for new housing in Mendocino County. Rural areas of the County do not have adequate public infrastructure and amenities to meet HCD projections. (R1, R3) Agree. Lack of water and sewer makes multi-family housing difficult in areas not in incorporated cities or community service districts with appropriate infrastructure.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Due to COVID-19 restrictions, PBS has developed more efficient digital options for routine matters which has created a more streamlined process to free PBS to pursue new opportunities for solving departmental issues and verifying State regulations and statistics. Partially Disagree. The workload of PBS has outpaced the efficiencies created with a more streamlined process. There is a need for full staffing which the BOS approved. Attempts at filling all positions has been ongoing. There is a need for long range planning. Funding was received for zoning code update.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
MCOG is designated by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development to coordinate the housing need allocation process for Mendocino County. By default, this has become the regional planning agency. Agree. This is a role that MCOG has been fulfilling.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The following Recommendation(s) have not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future; attached, as required, is a time frame for implementation:
F4
Lack of housing forces the price of existing housing to be unaffordable for working families as well as preventing new potential employees to choose to work in Mendocino County. Agree. There are also global factors affecting the local housing market such as state regulations, state and regional housing prices, drought, and wildfires. These all have an effect on the market driving prices higher.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The Median income of county residents and the higher cost of goods and services does not keep pace with the cost of new single-family homes, which discourages contractors from building here when they can profit from building in other areas. Agree. This is mostly from anecdotal sources. The labor market in Mendocino County impacts the willingness of contractors to work here.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The current shortage of affordable housing will continue without Mendocino County hiring qualified housing and community development planners. Such assets would assist in locating funding sources for infrastructure improvements, attracting appropriate developers, and informing the BOS what effect proposed regulations may have on the development of new housing. (R6) Agree. There is a need for hiring qualified planners. This has been difficult in the past but the BOS and PBS have focused on this area. Locating infrastructure (water, sewer, fire protection, etc.) improvements and an economic development coordinator, whether it be within the County system or an outside agency, could help to identify projects that would provide more housing.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
There is no formal or consistent communication between PBS and its counterparts in the cities of Fort Bragg, Point Arena, Ukiah and Willits which is indicative of the lack of planning on a regional basis in this County. Agree. There should be quarterly meetings between PBS and the cities.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
The prohibitive cost of new construction and limited income of most area residents makes new market-rate projects risky for builders. Patrially Disagree. There are market rate opportunities in the County.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The activation of a Mendocino County Building Trust Fund (In-Lieu fund) would give Mendocino County leverage in encouraging proactive development to meet the county’s needs for infrastructure and housing projects. Agree. This Building Trust Fund is underfunded at the moment. To have an impact, there is a need for greater funding. This might require a review of the inclusionary housing ordinance and process in which the Building Trust Fund is funded.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Federal and State funding is targeted to urban areas and the BOS does not direct PBS to actively seek mitigations on these restrictions to acquire funding for housing projects when State & Federal funds become available. Agree. County legislative platform and CSAC and RCRC representatives should address these concerns of redirecting state and federal dollars to rural areas.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
As a result of restrictions on the use of local budget monies, Mendocino County’s Native American Tribes may only be invited to the table when discretionary funds for housing are available through Federal sources. Agree. As sovereign nations, Tribes should be encouraged to work with the County to collaborate on housing opportunities. Response to Recommendations:
No recommendations for this finding