Adult Detention Facilities Inspections Facility Name Operated by Condition Comments Pasadena Courts Lacsd Satisfactory

Recommendations 19

• R1

  Page 127
  Table of Organization
• R2

  Page 127
  Emergency Procedures
• R3

  Page 127
  Fire Suppression Plan
• R4

  Page 127
  Policy on the use of Force
• R5

  Page 127
  Policy of the use of Restraints
• R6

  Page 132
  Serious Incident Reports
• R7

  Page 127
  Serious Incident Reports
• R8

  Page 127
  Logs on Safety Checks
• R9

  Page 127
  Complaint Forms MANUAL COMMENTS ______________________________________________________________________ 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 115 ADULT DETENTION FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT LIFE SAFETY REVIEW Exiting /Fire Suppression Y N NA a. Building evacuation procedure (demonstrated by staff) b. Area of refuge established (demonstrated by staff) c. Exit Signs posted (demonstrated by staff) e. Two means of egress (demonstrated by staff) f. Automatic sprinkler system g. Sprinkler heads concealed (no access to inmates) h. Fire extinguishers Certification current Staff access only i. Breathing Apparatus j. Smoke Management System (Air Exhaust) ACCOMMODATIONS Temporary Holding Cells a. Seating provided for 16 inmates maximum b. Water closet , wash basin, drink fountain provided within c. Staff visual supervision (during occupancy) a. Limit 8 inmates b. No seating allowed c. Water closet / wash basin/ drink fountain provided within d. Padded partition next to toilet fixture Safety Cell a. Limit one (1) inmate b. No seating allowed c. Flush toilet in floor d. Padded – walls and floor e. Variable intensity lighting f. Vertical view panels g. Food pass Single Occupancy Cell a. Water closet / wash basin / drink fountain provided within b. Bunk, desk & seat (Type I omit desk and seat) 116 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury ADULT DETENTION FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT Double Occupancy Cell Y N NA a. Same as single occupancy with two bunks Dormitories a. Max capacity 64 inmates, no less than 4 b. Access to water closets separate from wash basin and drinking fountains. Dayrooms a. Tables & seating for max bed count b. Showers Exercise Area (3 hours. / week) a. Type I & II outdoor area 15’ high Multi-purpose Space (Type I & II Required for correctional programs a. Classroom setting b. Other Medical Examination Room (Type I & II with 25 + inmates a. Located within security area b. Pharmaceuticals locked (secure from inmates) Commissary (Type II & III) a. Ability of inmate to purchase personal items Dining Facilities (Type II & III) Visitor Space Storage Rooms a. Personal property (note ventilation – exhaust) b. Institutional clothing etc. Emergency Power Confidential Rooms (Type II) Attorney Interview Space Telephone (Blue Phone) 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 117 ADULT DETENTION FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT Food Service – On Site SAT NOT SAT NA a. Sanitary Conditions (floor Sinks, etc. b. Refrigeration: Cold Storage Temp.__________ Freezer Temp. ______________ c. Dry Food Storage (on Stainless Steel Shelving) Food Service – Off Site Hot / Cold separation assembly APPEARANCE a. Graffiti b. Pealing paint c. Lighting d. Lockers e. Desks f. Mattresses g. Bedding / Pillows h. Sleeping Room Door Panels i. Locks (include function) GENERAL COMMENTS ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 118 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury (APPENDIX B) JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT BY THE JAILS COMMITTEE OF THE 2005-2006 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY DATE__________ARRIVAL TIME:________am/pm DEPARTURE TIME______ FACILITY NAME:__________________________________________________ ADDRESS________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER:_____________ CONTACT:_______________ CAPACITY_______POPULATION________ TOTAL EMPLOYEES__________ PROBATION OFFICERS ___________ CUSTODY ASSIST._________ INSPECTED BY: (1) ____________________________ (2)_____________________________ (3)_____________________________ REVIEW PREVIOUS INSPECTION REPORTS Agency when inspected report available Y N NA Correction Standards Authority (CAS – BOC) State Fire Marshal (SFM) Environmental Health Medical / Mental Health Health / Nutrition JAIL MANUALS REVIEW (Policies and Procedures)
• R10

  Page 150
  Great Beginnings 2 21st CCLC
• R11

  Page 150
  Kids Protectors of the Environment 2 21st CCLC
• R12

  Page 150
  Keep Youth Doing Something Inc. 1, 10 ASESP + 21st CCLC
• R13

  Page 150
  Learning for Life 2 21st CCLC
• R14

  Page 150
  Para Los Niños 1, 6 ASESP + 21st CCLC
• R15

  Page 150
  South Bay Center for Counseling 1 ASESP + 21st CCLC
• R16

  Page 150
  Star Education 8 21st CCLC
• R17

  Page 150
  Woodcraft Rangers 3, 17 ASESP + 21st CCLC
• R18

  Page 150
  YS CARE * 8, 22 ASESP + 21st CCLC YS CARE 41 County
• R19

  Page 150
  LA’s BEST * 71, 38 ASESP + 21st CCLC LA’s BEST 38 City, Private, and Other Federal TOTAL 315 * Note: Some YS CARE and LA’s BEST sites receive funds from both sources. The BTB goal was to have comprehensive after school programs in all 437 elementary schools by 2005. On average, 86,000 students use the programs daily although the actual number of individuals who use the program throughout the year exceeds 100,000. The gender participation rates are equal but the ethnic mix is skewed vs. the general day school population displayed in Exhibit I-5: 136 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury Exhibit I-5: After School Program Participants by Ethnicity Ethnic Description Count % of After School % in Day School American Indian/Alaska Native 175 0.2 .3 Asian 1,368 1.6 3.8 Black 10,963 12.8 11.6 Hispanic 69,932 81.4 72.8 White 2,231 2.6 9.0 Filipino 1,115 1.3 2.2 Pacific Islander 175 0.2 .3 TOTAL 85,959 100 100 Note: These participation data are based all age groups not just K – 5. The participation rate varied by grade (from 4 to 12 %) for K - 5 schools. 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 137 138 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury II: FINDINGS A. SURVEY RESULTS A survey was designed and sent to the key after school program stakeholders to ascertain their perceptions of how the program was operating. The respondents were asked to rank a series of statements such as follows: Please indicate your degree of agreement with the following statement. Disagree Disagree Agree SomewhatAgree No opinion Somewhat 1 2 3 4 Not included in All students who want/need after school Response programs have appropriate access to them. Average There were considerable differences in how the various stakeholders rated these statements. The differences may be a result of different expectations, some of which may be unrealistic given the: current legal requirements, financing available, and the organizational capacity of the system. Exhibit II-2 categorizes the 730 respondents to the survey by stakeholder group: Exhibit II-2: Respondents by BTB Stakeholder Affiliation Response Response Stakeholder Category Total Percent Parent 219 30% Principal or Designate 176 24% On-Site After School Program Administrator, Teacher, or Staff 201 28% BTB Contractor 17 2% BTB Official 14 2% LAUSD Senior Official or Board Member 7 1% Other 10 1% Skipped this question 86 12% TOTAL 730 100% The following is a summary of the survey results by area of inquiry. A detailed analysis is available in